All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
To: Paul Parsons <lost.distance@yahoo.com>
Cc: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, haojian.zhuang@gmail.com,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: pxa: fix regulator related build fail in magician_defconfig
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 09:46:08 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F5774B0.1030209@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1331084814.11802.YahooMailClassic@web29012.mail.ird.yahoo.com>

On 12-03-06 08:46 PM, Paul Parsons wrote:
> --- On Tue, 6/3/12, Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> wrote:
>> commit
>> 737f360d5bef5e01c6cfa755dca0b449a154c1e0 (linux-next)
>>
>>   "regulator: Remove support for supplies specified by
>> struct device"
>>
>> deletes the field from the struct, but this platform was
>> still trying
>> to set those fields.  Convert them to use the
>> REGULATOR_SUPPLY macro
>> so as to fix this failure:
>>
>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/magician.c:581: error: unknown field 'dev'
>> specified in initializer
>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/magician.c:581: warning: initialization
>> from incompatible pointer type
>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/magician.c:585: error: unknown field 'dev'
>> specified in initializer
>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/magician.c:585: warning: initialization
>> from incompatible pointer type
>>
>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/hx4700.c:683: error: unknown field 'dev'
>> specified in initializer
>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/hx4700.c:683: warning: initialization from
>> incompatible pointer type
>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/hx4700.c:687: error: unknown field 'dev'
>> specified in initializer
>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/hx4700.c:687: warning: initialization from
>> incompatible pointer type
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
>> ---
>>
>> [v2: convert to using REGULATOR_SUPPLY instead of just
>> deleting the
>>  instances of setting the .dev field ]
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/hx4700.c
>> b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/hx4700.c
>> index f2c23ea..53c3366 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/hx4700.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/hx4700.c
>> @@ -679,14 +679,8 @@ static struct platform_device
>> power_supply = {
>>   */
>>  
>>  static struct regulator_consumer_supply bq24022_consumers[]
>> = {
>> -    {
>> -        .dev =
>> &gpio_vbus.dev,
>> -        .supply =
>> "vbus_draw",
>> -    },
>> -    {
>> -        .dev =
>> &power_supply.dev,
>> -        .supply = "ac_draw",
>> -    },
>> +    REGULATOR_SUPPLY("vbus_draw",
>> "gpio_vbus"),
>> +    REGULATOR_SUPPLY("ac_draw",
>> "power_supply"),
>>  };
> 
> The above hx4700 patch yields the following warnings:
> 
> _regulator_get: gpio-vbus supply vbus_draw not found, using dummy regulator
> _regulator_get: pda-power supply ac_draw not found, using dummy regulator
> 
> I suggest the following lines instead:
> 
> 	REGULATOR_SUPPLY("vbus_draw", "gpio-vbus"),
> 	REGULATOR_SUPPLY("ac_draw", "pda-power"),

Thanks for the report.  The regulator code is rather foreign
to me, but I think I figured out the expectations on the names
last night when looking at a similar patch here:

http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg163418.html

I'll fix these two patches up, but next time I'll just report
the regulator regressions and let the sub-system maintainer
or the platform maintainer sort them out.

Paul.

> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: paul.gortmaker@windriver.com (Paul Gortmaker)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: pxa: fix regulator related build fail in magician_defconfig
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 09:46:08 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F5774B0.1030209@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1331084814.11802.YahooMailClassic@web29012.mail.ird.yahoo.com>

On 12-03-06 08:46 PM, Paul Parsons wrote:
> --- On Tue, 6/3/12, Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> wrote:
>> commit
>> 737f360d5bef5e01c6cfa755dca0b449a154c1e0 (linux-next)
>>
>>   "regulator: Remove support for supplies specified by
>> struct device"
>>
>> deletes the field from the struct, but this platform was
>> still trying
>> to set those fields.  Convert them to use the
>> REGULATOR_SUPPLY macro
>> so as to fix this failure:
>>
>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/magician.c:581: error: unknown field 'dev'
>> specified in initializer
>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/magician.c:581: warning: initialization
>> from incompatible pointer type
>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/magician.c:585: error: unknown field 'dev'
>> specified in initializer
>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/magician.c:585: warning: initialization
>> from incompatible pointer type
>>
>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/hx4700.c:683: error: unknown field 'dev'
>> specified in initializer
>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/hx4700.c:683: warning: initialization from
>> incompatible pointer type
>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/hx4700.c:687: error: unknown field 'dev'
>> specified in initializer
>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/hx4700.c:687: warning: initialization from
>> incompatible pointer type
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
>> ---
>>
>> [v2: convert to using REGULATOR_SUPPLY instead of just
>> deleting the
>>  instances of setting the .dev field ]
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/hx4700.c
>> b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/hx4700.c
>> index f2c23ea..53c3366 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/hx4700.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/hx4700.c
>> @@ -679,14 +679,8 @@ static struct platform_device
>> power_supply = {
>>   */
>>  
>>  static struct regulator_consumer_supply bq24022_consumers[]
>> = {
>> -    {
>> -        .dev =
>> &gpio_vbus.dev,
>> -        .supply =
>> "vbus_draw",
>> -    },
>> -    {
>> -        .dev =
>> &power_supply.dev,
>> -        .supply = "ac_draw",
>> -    },
>> +    REGULATOR_SUPPLY("vbus_draw",
>> "gpio_vbus"),
>> +    REGULATOR_SUPPLY("ac_draw",
>> "power_supply"),
>>  };
> 
> The above hx4700 patch yields the following warnings:
> 
> _regulator_get: gpio-vbus supply vbus_draw not found, using dummy regulator
> _regulator_get: pda-power supply ac_draw not found, using dummy regulator
> 
> I suggest the following lines instead:
> 
> 	REGULATOR_SUPPLY("vbus_draw", "gpio-vbus"),
> 	REGULATOR_SUPPLY("ac_draw", "pda-power"),

Thanks for the report.  The regulator code is rather foreign
to me, but I think I figured out the expectations on the names
last night when looking at a similar patch here:

http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg163418.html

I'll fix these two patches up, but next time I'll just report
the regulator regressions and let the sub-system maintainer
or the platform maintainer sort them out.

Paul.

> 

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-07 14:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-06 19:46 [PATCH] ARM: pxa: fix regulator related build fail in magician_defconfig Paul Gortmaker
2012-03-06 19:46 ` Paul Gortmaker
2012-03-06 20:01 ` Mark Brown
2012-03-06 20:01   ` Mark Brown
2012-03-06 20:49   ` [PATCH v2] " Paul Gortmaker
2012-03-06 20:49     ` Paul Gortmaker
2012-03-07  1:46     ` Paul Parsons
2012-03-07  1:46       ` Paul Parsons
2012-03-07 14:46       ` Paul Gortmaker [this message]
2012-03-07 14:46         ` Paul Gortmaker
2012-03-07 14:57         ` Mark Brown
2012-03-07 14:57           ` Mark Brown
2012-03-08 21:34       ` [PATCH] " Paul Gortmaker
2012-03-08 21:34         ` Paul Gortmaker
2012-03-09  2:47         ` Paul Parsons
2012-03-09  2:47           ` Paul Parsons
2012-03-14  8:38         ` Haojian Zhuang
2012-03-14  8:38           ` Haojian Zhuang
2012-03-14 12:30           ` Paul Gortmaker
2012-03-14 12:30             ` Paul Gortmaker
2012-03-14 12:32             ` Mark Brown
2012-03-14 12:32               ` Mark Brown
2012-03-28  9:43               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-28  9:43                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-28 10:18                 ` Mark Brown
2012-03-28 10:18                   ` Mark Brown
2012-03-28 13:36                   ` Haojian Zhuang
2012-03-28 13:36                     ` Haojian Zhuang
2012-03-28 17:56                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-28 17:56                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-28 18:10                     ` Mark Brown
2012-03-28 18:10                       ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F5774B0.1030209@windriver.com \
    --to=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=haojian.zhuang@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lost.distance@yahoo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.