All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org>
To: srinivas.kandagatla@st.com
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	peppe.cavallaro@st.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] stmmac: Allow stmmac to work with other PHY buses(v2).
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 10:16:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F5878D4.1060603@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F57178C.7010407@st.com>

Hi,

Le 03/07/12 09:08, Srinivas KANDAGATLA a écrit :
> David Miller wrote:
>> From: Giuseppe CAVALLARO<peppe.cavallaro@st.com>
>> Date: Tue,  6 Mar 2012 06:42:00 +0100
>>
>>
>>> After commit "db8857b stmmac: use an unique MDIO bus name" and "90b9a54
>>> stmmac: fix phy naming inconsistency" stmmac cant work with other MDIO
>>> buses, because mdio_bus name is fixed in the dirver.
>>>
>>
>> This sounds inaccurate, you're making it sound like these commits
>> introduced this limitation, as far as I can tell they did not.
>>
>>
> Thanks for your comments,
>
> Commit comment is true to some extent, before "db8857b stmmac: use an
> unique MDIO bus name" and "a77e929 mdio-gpio: use an unique MDIO bus
> name" we managed to get stmmac use mdio bus by specifying same id in
> platform data of both the drivers.

You could get it working with your platform supplied MDIO bus name more 
by accident than on purpose.

> However after these commits this method was no more possible because
> stmmac can connect to phys on stmmac-x mdio buses Only.
>
> I think, originally the problem was in stmmac to some extent which
> became worse after adding prefix mdio bus.
> Here is the new patch removing the misleading comments.

Your new explanation makes much more sense to me now. Feel free to add my:

Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org>

>
>
>> Before the MDIO bus name was just plain "%x" and the bus_id number
>> was placed there.  Then it became the same thing, except with some
>> (potentially fixed) prefix.
>>
>> Nothing about that change makes any difference whatsoever about
>> what you're modifications are trying to allow.
>>
>> BTW, also, commit "90b9a54" is ambiguous.
>>
>>
> Actual commit was : 90b9a5454fd2e626aa1614fe9ece6b63a0dc37af
>
> Thanks,
> srini
>> [davem@bql net]$ git show 90b9a54
>> error: short SHA1 90b9a54 is ambiguous.
>> error: short SHA1 90b9a54 is ambiguous.
>> fatal: ambiguous argument '90b9a54': unknown revision or path not in the working tree.
>>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-08  9:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-06  5:42 [PATCH] stmmac: Allow stmmac to work with other PHY buses(v2) Giuseppe CAVALLARO
2012-03-06 21:57 ` David Miller
2012-03-07  8:08   ` Srinivas KANDAGATLA
2012-03-08  9:16     ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2012-03-08 14:03     ` Giuseppe CAVALLARO

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F5878D4.1060603@openwrt.org \
    --to=florian@openwrt.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peppe.cavallaro@st.com \
    --cc=srinivas.kandagatla@st.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.