All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladislav Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
To: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.de>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie@redhat.com>,
	David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>,
	Sridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com>,
	cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dlm: Do not allocate a fd for peeloff
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 20:08:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F5911B1.6050600@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1331222159-28980-2-git-send-email-bpoirier@suse.de>

On 03/08/2012 10:55 AM, Benjamin Poirier wrote:
> avoids allocating a fd that a) propagates to every kernel thread and
> usermodehelper b) is not properly released.
> 
> References: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network.drbd/22529
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.de>

Looks much better.

-vlad

> ---
>  fs/dlm/lowcomms.c |   22 ++++++++--------------
>  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c b/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c
> index 0b3109e..ca0c59a 100644
> --- a/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c
> +++ b/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c
> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@
>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
>  #include <linux/sctp.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <net/sctp/sctp.h>
>  #include <net/sctp/user.h>
>  #include <net/ipv6.h>
>  
> @@ -474,9 +475,6 @@ static void process_sctp_notification(struct connection *con,
>  			int prim_len, ret;
>  			int addr_len;
>  			struct connection *new_con;
> -			sctp_peeloff_arg_t parg;
> -			int parglen = sizeof(parg);
> -			int err;
>  
>  			/*
>  			 * We get this before any data for an association.
> @@ -525,23 +523,19 @@ static void process_sctp_notification(struct connection *con,
>  				return;
>  
>  			/* Peel off a new sock */
> -			parg.associd = sn->sn_assoc_change.sac_assoc_id;
> -			ret = kernel_getsockopt(con->sock, IPPROTO_SCTP,
> -						SCTP_SOCKOPT_PEELOFF,
> -						(void *)&parg, &parglen);
> +			sctp_lock_sock(con->sock->sk);
> +			ret = sctp_do_peeloff(con->sock->sk,
> +				sn->sn_assoc_change.sac_assoc_id,
> +				&new_con->sock);
> +			sctp_release_sock(con->sock->sk);
>  			if (ret < 0) {
>  				log_print("Can't peel off a socket for "
>  					  "connection %d to node %d: err=%d",
> -					  parg.associd, nodeid, ret);
> -				return;
> -			}
> -			new_con->sock = sockfd_lookup(parg.sd, &err);
> -			if (!new_con->sock) {
> -				log_print("sockfd_lookup error %d", err);
> +					  (int)sn->sn_assoc_change.sac_assoc_id,
> +					  nodeid, ret);
>  				return;
>  			}
>  			add_sock(new_con->sock, new_con);
> -			sockfd_put(new_con->sock);
>  
>  			log_print("connecting to %d sctp association %d",
>  				 nodeid, (int)sn->sn_assoc_change.sac_assoc_id);


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vladislav Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
To: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.de>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie@redhat.com>,
	David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>,
	Sridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com>,
	cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dlm: Do not allocate a fd for peeloff
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 15:08:17 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F5911B1.6050600@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1331222159-28980-2-git-send-email-bpoirier@suse.de>

On 03/08/2012 10:55 AM, Benjamin Poirier wrote:
> avoids allocating a fd that a) propagates to every kernel thread and
> usermodehelper b) is not properly released.
> 
> References: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network.drbd/22529
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.de>

Looks much better.

-vlad

> ---
>  fs/dlm/lowcomms.c |   22 ++++++++--------------
>  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c b/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c
> index 0b3109e..ca0c59a 100644
> --- a/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c
> +++ b/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c
> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@
>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
>  #include <linux/sctp.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <net/sctp/sctp.h>
>  #include <net/sctp/user.h>
>  #include <net/ipv6.h>
>  
> @@ -474,9 +475,6 @@ static void process_sctp_notification(struct connection *con,
>  			int prim_len, ret;
>  			int addr_len;
>  			struct connection *new_con;
> -			sctp_peeloff_arg_t parg;
> -			int parglen = sizeof(parg);
> -			int err;
>  
>  			/*
>  			 * We get this before any data for an association.
> @@ -525,23 +523,19 @@ static void process_sctp_notification(struct connection *con,
>  				return;
>  
>  			/* Peel off a new sock */
> -			parg.associd = sn->sn_assoc_change.sac_assoc_id;
> -			ret = kernel_getsockopt(con->sock, IPPROTO_SCTP,
> -						SCTP_SOCKOPT_PEELOFF,
> -						(void *)&parg, &parglen);
> +			sctp_lock_sock(con->sock->sk);
> +			ret = sctp_do_peeloff(con->sock->sk,
> +				sn->sn_assoc_change.sac_assoc_id,
> +				&new_con->sock);
> +			sctp_release_sock(con->sock->sk);
>  			if (ret < 0) {
>  				log_print("Can't peel off a socket for "
>  					  "connection %d to node %d: err=%d",
> -					  parg.associd, nodeid, ret);
> -				return;
> -			}
> -			new_con->sock = sockfd_lookup(parg.sd, &err);
> -			if (!new_con->sock) {
> -				log_print("sockfd_lookup error %d", err);
> +					  (int)sn->sn_assoc_change.sac_assoc_id,
> +					  nodeid, ret);
>  				return;
>  			}
>  			add_sock(new_con->sock, new_con);
> -			sockfd_put(new_con->sock);
>  
>  			log_print("connecting to %d sctp association %d",
>  				 nodeid, (int)sn->sn_assoc_change.sac_assoc_id);


  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-08 20:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-07 15:41 [PATCH] dlm, sctp: Do not allocate a fd for peeloff Benjamin Poirier
2012-03-07 15:41 ` Benjamin Poirier
2012-03-07 16:29 ` Vladislav Yasevich
2012-03-07 16:29   ` Vladislav Yasevich
2012-03-08  8:24   ` [Cluster-devel] " David Miller
2012-03-08  8:24     ` David Miller
2012-03-08  8:24     ` David Miller
2012-03-08 15:55     ` [PATCH v2 1/2] sctp: Export sctp_do_peeloff Benjamin Poirier
2012-03-08 15:55       ` Benjamin Poirier
2012-03-08 15:55       ` [PATCH v2 2/2] dlm: Do not allocate a fd for peeloff Benjamin Poirier
2012-03-08 15:55         ` Benjamin Poirier
2012-03-08 20:08         ` Vladislav Yasevich [this message]
2012-03-08 20:08           ` Vladislav Yasevich
2012-03-08 21:52           ` [Cluster-devel] " David Miller
2012-03-08 21:52             ` David Miller
2012-03-08 21:52             ` David Miller
2012-03-08 20:07       ` [PATCH v2 1/2] sctp: Export sctp_do_peeloff Vladislav Yasevich
2012-03-08 20:07         ` Vladislav Yasevich
2012-03-08 21:52         ` [Cluster-devel] " David Miller
2012-03-08 21:52           ` David Miller
2012-03-08 21:52           ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F5911B1.6050600@hp.com \
    --to=vladislav.yasevich@hp.com \
    --cc=bpoirier@suse.de \
    --cc=ccaulfie@redhat.com \
    --cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sri@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=teigland@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.