From: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7 v2] mm: rework __isolate_lru_page() file/anon filter
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 11:16:12 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F59AE3C.5040200@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1203081758490.18195@eggly.anvils>
Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Mar 2012, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>> On Tue, 6 Mar 2012 19:22:21 -0800 (PST)
>> Hugh Dickins<hughd@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> What does the compiler say (4.5.1 here, OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE off)?
>>> text data bss dec hex filename
>>> 17723 113 17 17853 45bd vmscan.o.0
>>> 17671 113 17 17801 4589 vmscan.o.1
>>> 17803 113 17 17933 460d vmscan.o.2
>>>
>>> That suggests that your v2 is the worst and your v1 the best.
>>> Kame, can I persuade you to let the compiler decide on this?
>>>
>>
>> Hmm. How about Costa' proposal ? as
>>
>> int tmp_var = PageActive(page) ? ISOLATE_ACTIVE : ISOLATE_INACTIVE
>> if (!(mode& tmp_var))
>> ret;
>
> Yes, that would have been a good compromise (given a better name
> than "tmp_var"!), I didn't realize that one was acceptable to you.
>
> But I see that Konstantin has been inspired by our disagreement to a
> more creative solution.
>
> I like very much the look of what he's come up with, but I'm still
> puzzling over why it barely makes any improvement to __isolate_lru_page():
> seems significantly inferior (in code size terms) to his original (which
> I imagine Glauber's compromise would be equivalent to).
>
> At some point I ought to give up on niggling about this,
> but I haven't quite got there yet.
(with if())
$ ./scripts/bloat-o-meter built-in.o built-in.o-v1
add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 2/1 up/down: 32/-20 (12)
function old new delta
static.shrink_active_list 837 853 +16
shrink_inactive_list 1259 1275 +16
static.isolate_lru_pages 1055 1035 -20
(with switch())
$ ./scripts/bloat-o-meter built-in.o built-in.o-v2
add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 4/2 up/down: 111/-23 (88)
function old new delta
__isolate_lru_page 301 377 +76
static.shrink_active_list 837 853 +16
shrink_inactive_list 1259 1275 +16
page_evictable 170 173 +3
__remove_mapping 322 319 -3
static.isolate_lru_pages 1055 1035 -20
(without __always_inline on page_lru())
$ ./scripts/bloat-o-meter built-in.o built-in.o-v5-noinline
add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 5/2 up/down: 93/-23 (70)
function old new delta
__isolate_lru_page 301 333 +32
isolate_lru_page 359 385 +26
static.shrink_active_list 837 853 +16
putback_inactive_pages 635 651 +16
page_evictable 170 173 +3
__remove_mapping 322 319 -3
static.isolate_lru_pages 1055 1035 -20
$ ./scripts/bloat-o-meter built-in.o built-in.o-v5
add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 3/4 up/down: 35/-67 (-32)
function old new delta
static.shrink_active_list 837 853 +16
__isolate_lru_page 301 317 +16
page_evictable 170 173 +3
__remove_mapping 322 319 -3
mem_cgroup_lru_del 73 65 -8
static.isolate_lru_pages 1055 1035 -20
__mem_cgroup_commit_charge 676 640 -36
Actually __isolate_lru_page() even little bit bigger
>
> Hugh
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7 v2] mm: rework __isolate_lru_page() file/anon filter
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 11:16:12 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F59AE3C.5040200@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1203081758490.18195@eggly.anvils>
Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Mar 2012, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>> On Tue, 6 Mar 2012 19:22:21 -0800 (PST)
>> Hugh Dickins<hughd@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> What does the compiler say (4.5.1 here, OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE off)?
>>> text data bss dec hex filename
>>> 17723 113 17 17853 45bd vmscan.o.0
>>> 17671 113 17 17801 4589 vmscan.o.1
>>> 17803 113 17 17933 460d vmscan.o.2
>>>
>>> That suggests that your v2 is the worst and your v1 the best.
>>> Kame, can I persuade you to let the compiler decide on this?
>>>
>>
>> Hmm. How about Costa' proposal ? as
>>
>> int tmp_var = PageActive(page) ? ISOLATE_ACTIVE : ISOLATE_INACTIVE
>> if (!(mode& tmp_var))
>> ret;
>
> Yes, that would have been a good compromise (given a better name
> than "tmp_var"!), I didn't realize that one was acceptable to you.
>
> But I see that Konstantin has been inspired by our disagreement to a
> more creative solution.
>
> I like very much the look of what he's come up with, but I'm still
> puzzling over why it barely makes any improvement to __isolate_lru_page():
> seems significantly inferior (in code size terms) to his original (which
> I imagine Glauber's compromise would be equivalent to).
>
> At some point I ought to give up on niggling about this,
> but I haven't quite got there yet.
(with if())
$ ./scripts/bloat-o-meter built-in.o built-in.o-v1
add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 2/1 up/down: 32/-20 (12)
function old new delta
static.shrink_active_list 837 853 +16
shrink_inactive_list 1259 1275 +16
static.isolate_lru_pages 1055 1035 -20
(with switch())
$ ./scripts/bloat-o-meter built-in.o built-in.o-v2
add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 4/2 up/down: 111/-23 (88)
function old new delta
__isolate_lru_page 301 377 +76
static.shrink_active_list 837 853 +16
shrink_inactive_list 1259 1275 +16
page_evictable 170 173 +3
__remove_mapping 322 319 -3
static.isolate_lru_pages 1055 1035 -20
(without __always_inline on page_lru())
$ ./scripts/bloat-o-meter built-in.o built-in.o-v5-noinline
add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 5/2 up/down: 93/-23 (70)
function old new delta
__isolate_lru_page 301 333 +32
isolate_lru_page 359 385 +26
static.shrink_active_list 837 853 +16
putback_inactive_pages 635 651 +16
page_evictable 170 173 +3
__remove_mapping 322 319 -3
static.isolate_lru_pages 1055 1035 -20
$ ./scripts/bloat-o-meter built-in.o built-in.o-v5
add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 3/4 up/down: 35/-67 (-32)
function old new delta
static.shrink_active_list 837 853 +16
__isolate_lru_page 301 317 +16
page_evictable 170 173 +3
__remove_mapping 322 319 -3
mem_cgroup_lru_del 73 65 -8
static.isolate_lru_pages 1055 1035 -20
__mem_cgroup_commit_charge 676 640 -36
Actually __isolate_lru_page() even little bit bigger
>
> Hugh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-09 7:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-29 9:15 [PATCH v4 ch1 0/7] mm: some cleanup/rework before lru_lock splitting Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-29 9:15 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-29 9:15 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm/memcg: scanning_global_lru means mem_cgroup_disabled Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-29 9:15 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-02 5:12 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-02 5:12 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-06 11:46 ` Glauber Costa
2012-03-06 11:46 ` Glauber Costa
2012-02-29 9:15 ` [PATCH 2/7] mm/memcg: move reclaim_stat into lruvec Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-29 9:15 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-02 5:14 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-02 5:14 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-02-29 9:15 ` [PATCH 3/7] mm: rework __isolate_lru_page() file/anon filter Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-29 9:15 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-02 5:17 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-02 5:17 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-02 5:51 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-02 5:51 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-02 8:17 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-02 8:17 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-02 8:53 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-02 8:53 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-06 11:57 ` Glauber Costa
2012-03-06 11:57 ` Glauber Costa
2012-03-06 12:53 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-06 12:53 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-03 0:22 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-03-03 0:22 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-03-03 8:27 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-03 8:27 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-03 9:20 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-03 9:20 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-03 9:16 ` [PATCH 3/7 v2] " Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-03 9:16 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-05 0:27 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-05 0:27 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-07 3:22 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-03-07 3:22 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-03-08 5:30 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-08 5:30 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-09 2:06 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-03-09 2:06 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-03-09 7:16 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov [this message]
2012-03-09 7:16 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-10 0:04 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-03-10 0:04 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-03-10 6:55 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-10 6:55 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-10 9:46 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-10 9:46 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-15 1:47 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-03-15 1:47 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-03-15 6:03 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-15 6:03 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-15 23:58 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-03-15 23:58 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-02-29 9:15 ` [PATCH 4/7] mm: push lru index into shrink_[in]active_list() Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-29 9:15 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-02 5:21 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-02 5:21 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-03 0:24 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-03-03 0:24 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-02-29 9:15 ` [PATCH 5/7] mm: rework reclaim_stat counters Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-29 9:15 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-02 5:28 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-02 5:28 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-02 6:11 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-02 6:11 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-02 8:03 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-02 8:03 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-02-29 9:16 ` [PATCH 6/7] mm/memcg: rework inactive_ratio calculation Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-29 9:16 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-02 5:31 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-02 5:31 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-02 6:24 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-02 6:24 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-08 5:36 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-08 5:36 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-02-29 9:16 ` [PATCH 7/7] mm/memcg: use vm_swappiness from target memory cgroup Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-29 9:16 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-02 5:32 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-02 5:32 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F59AE3C.5040200@openvz.org \
--to=khlebnikov@openvz.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jweiner@redhat.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.