All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: alan@signal11.us (Alan Ott)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: at91: only RM9200 has ISA-style PIO
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 15:06:06 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F5BB42E.3090201@signal11.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201203101924.31710.arnd@arndb.de>

On 03/10/2012 02:24 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Saturday 10 March 2012, Alan Ott wrote:
>> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>>
>> Most at91 systems have no support for PCMCIA or other
>> PC-style buses, so we can select NO_IOPORT in order to
>> disable compilationf or all drivers that need these.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Alan Ott <alan@signal11.us>
> You forgot to Cc the at91 maintainers on this patch (and on patch 0).
> Also, this patch relies on the another series I did to redefine
> the meaning of CONFIG_NO_IOPORT while renaming the existing one to
> CONFIG_NO_IOPORT_MAP. This patch will have to wait for the other
> series.

Hi Arnd,

I'm going to assume you mean randconfig/ioport in
git://git.linaro.org/people/arnd/linux.git .
I'll take this patch out for v2 and make a note that it needs to go with
the patches in randconfig/ioport.

I used scripts/get_maintainers.pl for the recipient list, but I now see
how that failed, since this patch modifies the AT91 section of a file
not in arc/arm/mach-at91.

Alan.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alan Ott <alan@signal11.us>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: at91: only RM9200 has ISA-style PIO
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 15:06:06 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F5BB42E.3090201@signal11.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201203101924.31710.arnd@arndb.de>

On 03/10/2012 02:24 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Saturday 10 March 2012, Alan Ott wrote:
>> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>>
>> Most at91 systems have no support for PCMCIA or other
>> PC-style buses, so we can select NO_IOPORT in order to
>> disable compilationf or all drivers that need these.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Alan Ott <alan@signal11.us>
> You forgot to Cc the at91 maintainers on this patch (and on patch 0).
> Also, this patch relies on the another series I did to redefine
> the meaning of CONFIG_NO_IOPORT while renaming the existing one to
> CONFIG_NO_IOPORT_MAP. This patch will have to wait for the other
> series.

Hi Arnd,

I'm going to assume you mean randconfig/ioport in
git://git.linaro.org/people/arnd/linux.git .
I'll take this patch out for v2 and make a note that it needs to go with
the patches in randconfig/ioport.

I used scripts/get_maintainers.pl for the recipient list, but I now see
how that failed, since this patch modifies the AT91 section of a file
not in arc/arm/mach-at91.

Alan.


  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-10 20:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-10 18:44 [PATCH 0/2] ARM: AT91: cleanup patches from Arnd Bergmann Alan Ott
2012-03-10 18:44 ` Alan Ott
2012-03-10 18:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: at91: only RM9200 has ISA-style PIO Alan Ott
2012-03-10 18:44   ` Alan Ott
2012-03-10 19:24   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-10 19:24     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-10 20:06     ` Alan Ott [this message]
2012-03-10 20:06       ` Alan Ott
2012-03-10 18:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: at91: Use proper __iomem annotations Alan Ott
2012-03-10 18:44   ` Alan Ott
2012-03-12  2:02   ` Olof Johansson
2012-03-12  2:02     ` Olof Johansson
2012-03-10 23:14 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] ARM: AT91: cleanup patches from Arnd Bergmann Alan Ott
2012-03-10 23:14   ` Alan Ott
2012-03-10 23:15   ` [PATCH v2 1/1] ARM: at91: Use proper __iomem annotations Alan Ott
2012-03-10 23:15     ` Alan Ott

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F5BB42E.3090201@signal11.us \
    --to=alan@signal11.us \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.