* [PATCH v4 0/2] ARM: Exynos: Add irq_domain and device tree support for combiner
@ 2012-02-21 4:33 ` Thomas Abraham
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Abraham @ 2012-02-21 4:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Changes since v3:
- In dt case, the use of fixed gic linux irq number to map the combiner
interrupt output is removed. This is replaced with the interrupt number
obtained from the gic irq domain. (Thanks to Rob Herring and Grant
Likely for this suggestion).
- Split the patch into two parts - irq_domain and device tree support
addition.
Changes since v2:
- Rebased to Grant's irqdomain/next branch.
Changes since v1:
- Includes all changes suggested by Rob Herring.
- Tested with SPARSE_IRQ enabled.
This patchset adds irq_domain and device tree support for the Exynos Interrupt
Combiner controller.
The first patch adds a common irq domain for the interrupts managed by the
interrupt combiners. All the instances of irq combiner reference the common irq
domain for translating hardware interrupts to linux irq number.
The second patch adds a interrupt specifier translator to support device tree
based instantiation. It can translate interrupt specifiers for device nodes
which use combiner as their interrupt parent.
This patchset is based on
http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git [for-next]
with all irq_domain (v5) patches merged from
http://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6.git [irqdomain/next]
Thomas Abraham (2):
ARM: Exynos: Add irq_domain support for interrupt combiner
ARM: Exynos: Add device tree support for interrupt combiner
.../bindings/arm/samsung/interrupt-combiner.txt | 48 +++++++++
arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/interrupt-combiner.txt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 1/2] ARM: Exynos: Add irq_domain support for interrupt combiner
2012-02-21 4:33 ` Thomas Abraham
@ 2012-02-21 4:33 ` Thomas Abraham
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Abraham @ 2012-02-21 4:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-samsung-soc
Cc: rob.herring, grant.likely, kgene.kim, linux-arm-kernel, patches
Add irq_domain support for hardware interrupts of the interrupt combiner.
The hardware interrupts of all the instances of the combiner are grouped
in a single irq_domain.
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c
index f494db8..0c06fa6 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c
@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@
#include <linux/serial_core.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/of_irq.h>
+#include <linux/export.h>
+#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
#include <asm/proc-fns.h>
#include <asm/exception.h>
@@ -284,6 +286,7 @@ struct combiner_chip_data {
void __iomem *base;
};
+static struct irq_domain *combiner_irq_domain;
static struct combiner_chip_data combiner_data[MAX_COMBINER_NR];
static inline void __iomem *combiner_base(struct irq_data *data)
@@ -296,14 +299,14 @@ static inline void __iomem *combiner_base(struct irq_data *data)
static void combiner_mask_irq(struct irq_data *data)
{
- u32 mask = 1 << (data->irq % 32);
+ u32 mask = 1 << (data->hwirq % 32);
__raw_writel(mask, combiner_base(data) + COMBINER_ENABLE_CLEAR);
}
static void combiner_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *data)
{
- u32 mask = 1 << (data->irq % 32);
+ u32 mask = 1 << (data->hwirq % 32);
__raw_writel(mask, combiner_base(data) + COMBINER_ENABLE_SET);
}
@@ -352,30 +355,58 @@ static void __init combiner_cascade_irq(unsigned int combiner_nr, unsigned int i
irq_set_chained_handler(irq, combiner_handle_cascade_irq);
}
-static void __init combiner_init(unsigned int combiner_nr, void __iomem *base,
- unsigned int irq_start)
+static void __init combiner_init_one(unsigned int combiner_nr,
+ void __iomem *base)
{
- unsigned int i;
-
if (combiner_nr >= MAX_COMBINER_NR)
BUG();
combiner_data[combiner_nr].base = base;
- combiner_data[combiner_nr].irq_offset = irq_start;
+ combiner_data[combiner_nr].irq_offset = irq_find_mapping(
+ combiner_irq_domain, combiner_nr * MAX_IRQ_IN_COMBINER);
combiner_data[combiner_nr].irq_mask = 0xff << ((combiner_nr % 4) << 3);
/* Disable all interrupts */
__raw_writel(combiner_data[combiner_nr].irq_mask,
base + COMBINER_ENABLE_CLEAR);
+}
+
+static int combiner_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
+ irq_hw_number_t hw)
+{
+ irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &combiner_chip, handle_level_irq);
+ irq_set_chip_data(irq, &combiner_data[hw >> 3]);
+ set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
+ return 0;
+}
- /* Setup the Linux IRQ subsystem */
+static struct irq_domain_ops combiner_irq_domain_ops = {
+ .map = combiner_irq_domain_map,
+};
- for (i = irq_start; i < combiner_data[combiner_nr].irq_offset
- + MAX_IRQ_IN_COMBINER; i++) {
- irq_set_chip_and_handler(i, &combiner_chip, handle_level_irq);
- irq_set_chip_data(i, &combiner_data[combiner_nr]);
- set_irq_flags(i, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
+void __init combiner_init(void __iomem *combiner_base, struct device_node *np)
+{
+ int i, irq_base;
+ int nr_irq = MAX_COMBINER_NR * MAX_IRQ_IN_COMBINER;
+
+ irq_base = irq_alloc_descs(COMBINER_IRQ(0, 0), 1, nr_irq, 0);
+ if (IS_ERR_VALUE(irq_base)) {
+ irq_base = COMBINER_IRQ(0, 0);
+ pr_warning("combiner_init_irq_domain: irq desc alloc failed. "
+ "Continuing with %d as linux irq base\n", irq_base);
+ }
+
+ combiner_irq_domain = irq_domain_add_legacy(np, nr_irq, irq_base, 0,
+ &combiner_irq_domain_ops, &combiner_data);
+ if (WARN_ON(!combiner_irq_domain)) {
+ pr_warning("combiner_init_irq_domain: irq domain init failed\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_COMBINER_NR; i++) {
+ combiner_init_one(i, combiner_base + (i >> 2) * 0x10);
+ combiner_cascade_irq(i, IRQ_SPI(i));
}
}
@@ -388,7 +419,6 @@ static const struct of_device_id exynos4_dt_irq_match[] = {
void __init exynos4_init_irq(void)
{
- int irq;
unsigned int gic_bank_offset;
gic_bank_offset = soc_is_exynos4412() ? 0x4000 : 0x8000;
@@ -400,12 +430,7 @@ void __init exynos4_init_irq(void)
of_irq_init(exynos4_dt_irq_match);
#endif
- for (irq = 0; irq < MAX_COMBINER_NR; irq++) {
-
- combiner_init(irq, (void __iomem *)S5P_VA_COMBINER(irq),
- COMBINER_IRQ(irq, 0));
- combiner_cascade_irq(irq, IRQ_SPI(irq));
- }
+ combiner_init(S5P_VA_COMBINER_BASE, NULL);
/*
* The parameters of s5p_init_irq() are for VIC init.
--
1.6.6.rc2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [PATCH v4 1/2] ARM: Exynos: Add irq_domain support for interrupt combiner
@ 2012-02-21 4:33 ` Thomas Abraham
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Abraham @ 2012-02-21 4:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Add irq_domain support for hardware interrupts of the interrupt combiner.
The hardware interrupts of all the instances of the combiner are grouped
in a single irq_domain.
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c
index f494db8..0c06fa6 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c
@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@
#include <linux/serial_core.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/of_irq.h>
+#include <linux/export.h>
+#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
#include <asm/proc-fns.h>
#include <asm/exception.h>
@@ -284,6 +286,7 @@ struct combiner_chip_data {
void __iomem *base;
};
+static struct irq_domain *combiner_irq_domain;
static struct combiner_chip_data combiner_data[MAX_COMBINER_NR];
static inline void __iomem *combiner_base(struct irq_data *data)
@@ -296,14 +299,14 @@ static inline void __iomem *combiner_base(struct irq_data *data)
static void combiner_mask_irq(struct irq_data *data)
{
- u32 mask = 1 << (data->irq % 32);
+ u32 mask = 1 << (data->hwirq % 32);
__raw_writel(mask, combiner_base(data) + COMBINER_ENABLE_CLEAR);
}
static void combiner_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *data)
{
- u32 mask = 1 << (data->irq % 32);
+ u32 mask = 1 << (data->hwirq % 32);
__raw_writel(mask, combiner_base(data) + COMBINER_ENABLE_SET);
}
@@ -352,30 +355,58 @@ static void __init combiner_cascade_irq(unsigned int combiner_nr, unsigned int i
irq_set_chained_handler(irq, combiner_handle_cascade_irq);
}
-static void __init combiner_init(unsigned int combiner_nr, void __iomem *base,
- unsigned int irq_start)
+static void __init combiner_init_one(unsigned int combiner_nr,
+ void __iomem *base)
{
- unsigned int i;
-
if (combiner_nr >= MAX_COMBINER_NR)
BUG();
combiner_data[combiner_nr].base = base;
- combiner_data[combiner_nr].irq_offset = irq_start;
+ combiner_data[combiner_nr].irq_offset = irq_find_mapping(
+ combiner_irq_domain, combiner_nr * MAX_IRQ_IN_COMBINER);
combiner_data[combiner_nr].irq_mask = 0xff << ((combiner_nr % 4) << 3);
/* Disable all interrupts */
__raw_writel(combiner_data[combiner_nr].irq_mask,
base + COMBINER_ENABLE_CLEAR);
+}
+
+static int combiner_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
+ irq_hw_number_t hw)
+{
+ irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &combiner_chip, handle_level_irq);
+ irq_set_chip_data(irq, &combiner_data[hw >> 3]);
+ set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
+ return 0;
+}
- /* Setup the Linux IRQ subsystem */
+static struct irq_domain_ops combiner_irq_domain_ops = {
+ .map = combiner_irq_domain_map,
+};
- for (i = irq_start; i < combiner_data[combiner_nr].irq_offset
- + MAX_IRQ_IN_COMBINER; i++) {
- irq_set_chip_and_handler(i, &combiner_chip, handle_level_irq);
- irq_set_chip_data(i, &combiner_data[combiner_nr]);
- set_irq_flags(i, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
+void __init combiner_init(void __iomem *combiner_base, struct device_node *np)
+{
+ int i, irq_base;
+ int nr_irq = MAX_COMBINER_NR * MAX_IRQ_IN_COMBINER;
+
+ irq_base = irq_alloc_descs(COMBINER_IRQ(0, 0), 1, nr_irq, 0);
+ if (IS_ERR_VALUE(irq_base)) {
+ irq_base = COMBINER_IRQ(0, 0);
+ pr_warning("combiner_init_irq_domain: irq desc alloc failed. "
+ "Continuing with %d as linux irq base\n", irq_base);
+ }
+
+ combiner_irq_domain = irq_domain_add_legacy(np, nr_irq, irq_base, 0,
+ &combiner_irq_domain_ops, &combiner_data);
+ if (WARN_ON(!combiner_irq_domain)) {
+ pr_warning("combiner_init_irq_domain: irq domain init failed\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_COMBINER_NR; i++) {
+ combiner_init_one(i, combiner_base + (i >> 2) * 0x10);
+ combiner_cascade_irq(i, IRQ_SPI(i));
}
}
@@ -388,7 +419,6 @@ static const struct of_device_id exynos4_dt_irq_match[] = {
void __init exynos4_init_irq(void)
{
- int irq;
unsigned int gic_bank_offset;
gic_bank_offset = soc_is_exynos4412() ? 0x4000 : 0x8000;
@@ -400,12 +430,7 @@ void __init exynos4_init_irq(void)
of_irq_init(exynos4_dt_irq_match);
#endif
- for (irq = 0; irq < MAX_COMBINER_NR; irq++) {
-
- combiner_init(irq, (void __iomem *)S5P_VA_COMBINER(irq),
- COMBINER_IRQ(irq, 0));
- combiner_cascade_irq(irq, IRQ_SPI(irq));
- }
+ combiner_init(S5P_VA_COMBINER_BASE, NULL);
/*
* The parameters of s5p_init_irq() are for VIC init.
--
1.6.6.rc2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 2/2] ARM: Exynos: Add device tree support for interrupt combiner
2012-02-21 4:33 ` Thomas Abraham
@ 2012-02-21 4:33 ` Thomas Abraham
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Abraham @ 2012-02-21 4:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-samsung-soc
Cc: rob.herring, grant.likely, kgene.kim, linux-arm-kernel, patches
Add device tree based instantiation of the interrupt combiner controller.
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>
---
.../bindings/arm/samsung/interrupt-combiner.txt | 48 ++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/interrupt-combiner.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/interrupt-combiner.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/interrupt-combiner.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2a57211
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/interrupt-combiner.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+* Samsung Exynos Interrupt Combiner Controller
+
+Samsung's Exynos4 architecture includes a interrupt combiner controller which
+can combine interrupt sources as a group and provide a single interrupt request
+for the group. The interrupt request from each group are connected to a parent
+interrupt controller, such as GIC in case of Exynos4210.
+
+The interrupt combiner controller consists of multiple combiners. Upto eight
+interrupt sources can be connected to a combiner. The combiner outputs one
+combined interrupt for its eight interrupt sources. The combined interrupt
+is usually connected to a parent interrupt controller.
+
+A single node in the device tree is used to describe the interrupt combiner
+controller module (which includes multiple combiners). A combiner in the
+interrupt controller module shares config/control registers with other
+combiners. For example, a 32-bit interrupt enable/disable config register
+can accommodate upto 4 interrupt combiners (with each combiner supporting
+upto 8 interrupt sources).
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible: should be "samsung,exynos4210-combiner".
+- interrupt-controller: Identifies the node as an interrupt controller.
+- #interrupt-cells: should be <2>. The meaning of the cells are
+ * First Cell: Combiner Group Number.
+ * Second Cell: Interrupt number within the group.
+- reg: Base address and size of interrupt combiner registers.
+- interrupts: The list of interrupts generated by the combiners which are then
+ connected to a parent interrupt controller. The format of the interrupt
+ specifier depends in the interrupt parent controller.
+
+Optional properties:
+- interrupt-parent: pHandle of the parent interrupt controller, if not
+ inherited from the parent node.
+
+Example:
+
+ The following is a an example from the Exynos4210 SoC dtsi file.
+
+ combiner:interrupt-controller@10440000 {
+ compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-combiner";
+ interrupt-controller;
+ #interrupt-cells = <2>;
+ reg = <0x10440000 0x1000>;
+ interrupts = <0 0 0>, <0 1 0>, <0 2 0>, <0 3 0>,
+ <0 4 0>, <0 5 0>, <0 6 0>, <0 7 0>,
+ <0 8 0>, <0 9 0>, <0 10 0>, <0 11 0>,
+ <0 12 0>, <0 13 0>, <0 14 0>, <0 15 0>;
+ };
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c
index 0c06fa6..ac5ac0e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#include <linux/of_irq.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
#include <asm/proc-fns.h>
#include <asm/exception.h>
@@ -372,6 +373,30 @@ static void __init combiner_init_one(unsigned int combiner_nr,
base + COMBINER_ENABLE_CLEAR);
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+static int combiner_irq_domain_xlate(struct irq_domain *d,
+ struct device_node *controller, const u32 *intspec,
+ unsigned int intsize, unsigned long *out_hwirq,
+ unsigned int *out_type)
+{
+ if (d->of_node != controller)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (intsize < 2)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ *out_hwirq = intspec[0] * MAX_IRQ_IN_COMBINER + intspec[1];
+ *out_type = 0;
+ return 0;
+}
+#else
+static int combiner_irq_domain_xlate(struct irq_domain *d,
+ struct device_node *controller, const u32 *intspec,
+ unsigned int intsize, unsigned long *out_hwirq,
+ unsigned int *out_type)
+{
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
+#endif
+
static int combiner_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
irq_hw_number_t hw)
{
@@ -382,12 +407,13 @@ static int combiner_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
}
static struct irq_domain_ops combiner_irq_domain_ops = {
+ .xlate = combiner_irq_domain_xlate,
.map = combiner_irq_domain_map,
};
void __init combiner_init(void __iomem *combiner_base, struct device_node *np)
{
- int i, irq_base;
+ int i, irq, irq_base;
int nr_irq = MAX_COMBINER_NR * MAX_IRQ_IN_COMBINER;
irq_base = irq_alloc_descs(COMBINER_IRQ(0, 0), 1, nr_irq, 0);
@@ -406,13 +432,33 @@ void __init combiner_init(void __iomem *combiner_base, struct device_node *np)
for (i = 0; i < MAX_COMBINER_NR; i++) {
combiner_init_one(i, combiner_base + (i >> 2) * 0x10);
- combiner_cascade_irq(i, IRQ_SPI(i));
+#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+ irq = np ? irq_of_parse_and_map(np, i) : IRQ_SPI(i);
+#else
+ irq = IRQ_SPI(i);
+#endif
+ combiner_cascade_irq(i, irq);
}
}
#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+void __init combiner_of_init(struct device_node *np, struct device_node *parent)
+{
+ void __iomem *combiner_base;
+
+ combiner_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
+ if (!combiner_base) {
+ pr_err("combiner_of_init: failed to map combiner registers\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ combiner_init(combiner_base, np);
+}
+
static const struct of_device_id exynos4_dt_irq_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-gic", .data = gic_of_init, },
+ { .compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-combiner",
+ .data = combiner_of_init, },
{},
};
#endif
@@ -430,7 +476,8 @@ void __init exynos4_init_irq(void)
of_irq_init(exynos4_dt_irq_match);
#endif
- combiner_init(S5P_VA_COMBINER_BASE, NULL);
+ if (!of_have_populated_dt())
+ combiner_init(S5P_VA_COMBINER_BASE, NULL);
/*
* The parameters of s5p_init_irq() are for VIC init.
--
1.6.6.rc2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [PATCH v4 2/2] ARM: Exynos: Add device tree support for interrupt combiner
@ 2012-02-21 4:33 ` Thomas Abraham
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Abraham @ 2012-02-21 4:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Add device tree based instantiation of the interrupt combiner controller.
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>
---
.../bindings/arm/samsung/interrupt-combiner.txt | 48 ++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/interrupt-combiner.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/interrupt-combiner.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/interrupt-combiner.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2a57211
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/interrupt-combiner.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+* Samsung Exynos Interrupt Combiner Controller
+
+Samsung's Exynos4 architecture includes a interrupt combiner controller which
+can combine interrupt sources as a group and provide a single interrupt request
+for the group. The interrupt request from each group are connected to a parent
+interrupt controller, such as GIC in case of Exynos4210.
+
+The interrupt combiner controller consists of multiple combiners. Upto eight
+interrupt sources can be connected to a combiner. The combiner outputs one
+combined interrupt for its eight interrupt sources. The combined interrupt
+is usually connected to a parent interrupt controller.
+
+A single node in the device tree is used to describe the interrupt combiner
+controller module (which includes multiple combiners). A combiner in the
+interrupt controller module shares config/control registers with other
+combiners. For example, a 32-bit interrupt enable/disable config register
+can accommodate upto 4 interrupt combiners (with each combiner supporting
+upto 8 interrupt sources).
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible: should be "samsung,exynos4210-combiner".
+- interrupt-controller: Identifies the node as an interrupt controller.
+- #interrupt-cells: should be <2>. The meaning of the cells are
+ * First Cell: Combiner Group Number.
+ * Second Cell: Interrupt number within the group.
+- reg: Base address and size of interrupt combiner registers.
+- interrupts: The list of interrupts generated by the combiners which are then
+ connected to a parent interrupt controller. The format of the interrupt
+ specifier depends in the interrupt parent controller.
+
+Optional properties:
+- interrupt-parent: pHandle of the parent interrupt controller, if not
+ inherited from the parent node.
+
+Example:
+
+ The following is a an example from the Exynos4210 SoC dtsi file.
+
+ combiner:interrupt-controller at 10440000 {
+ compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-combiner";
+ interrupt-controller;
+ #interrupt-cells = <2>;
+ reg = <0x10440000 0x1000>;
+ interrupts = <0 0 0>, <0 1 0>, <0 2 0>, <0 3 0>,
+ <0 4 0>, <0 5 0>, <0 6 0>, <0 7 0>,
+ <0 8 0>, <0 9 0>, <0 10 0>, <0 11 0>,
+ <0 12 0>, <0 13 0>, <0 14 0>, <0 15 0>;
+ };
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c
index 0c06fa6..ac5ac0e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#include <linux/of_irq.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
#include <asm/proc-fns.h>
#include <asm/exception.h>
@@ -372,6 +373,30 @@ static void __init combiner_init_one(unsigned int combiner_nr,
base + COMBINER_ENABLE_CLEAR);
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+static int combiner_irq_domain_xlate(struct irq_domain *d,
+ struct device_node *controller, const u32 *intspec,
+ unsigned int intsize, unsigned long *out_hwirq,
+ unsigned int *out_type)
+{
+ if (d->of_node != controller)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (intsize < 2)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ *out_hwirq = intspec[0] * MAX_IRQ_IN_COMBINER + intspec[1];
+ *out_type = 0;
+ return 0;
+}
+#else
+static int combiner_irq_domain_xlate(struct irq_domain *d,
+ struct device_node *controller, const u32 *intspec,
+ unsigned int intsize, unsigned long *out_hwirq,
+ unsigned int *out_type)
+{
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
+#endif
+
static int combiner_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
irq_hw_number_t hw)
{
@@ -382,12 +407,13 @@ static int combiner_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
}
static struct irq_domain_ops combiner_irq_domain_ops = {
+ .xlate = combiner_irq_domain_xlate,
.map = combiner_irq_domain_map,
};
void __init combiner_init(void __iomem *combiner_base, struct device_node *np)
{
- int i, irq_base;
+ int i, irq, irq_base;
int nr_irq = MAX_COMBINER_NR * MAX_IRQ_IN_COMBINER;
irq_base = irq_alloc_descs(COMBINER_IRQ(0, 0), 1, nr_irq, 0);
@@ -406,13 +432,33 @@ void __init combiner_init(void __iomem *combiner_base, struct device_node *np)
for (i = 0; i < MAX_COMBINER_NR; i++) {
combiner_init_one(i, combiner_base + (i >> 2) * 0x10);
- combiner_cascade_irq(i, IRQ_SPI(i));
+#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+ irq = np ? irq_of_parse_and_map(np, i) : IRQ_SPI(i);
+#else
+ irq = IRQ_SPI(i);
+#endif
+ combiner_cascade_irq(i, irq);
}
}
#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+void __init combiner_of_init(struct device_node *np, struct device_node *parent)
+{
+ void __iomem *combiner_base;
+
+ combiner_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
+ if (!combiner_base) {
+ pr_err("combiner_of_init: failed to map combiner registers\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ combiner_init(combiner_base, np);
+}
+
static const struct of_device_id exynos4_dt_irq_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-gic", .data = gic_of_init, },
+ { .compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-combiner",
+ .data = combiner_of_init, },
{},
};
#endif
@@ -430,7 +476,8 @@ void __init exynos4_init_irq(void)
of_irq_init(exynos4_dt_irq_match);
#endif
- combiner_init(S5P_VA_COMBINER_BASE, NULL);
+ if (!of_have_populated_dt())
+ combiner_init(S5P_VA_COMBINER_BASE, NULL);
/*
* The parameters of s5p_init_irq() are for VIC init.
--
1.6.6.rc2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] ARM: Exynos: Add device tree support for interrupt combiner
2012-02-21 4:33 ` Thomas Abraham
@ 2012-03-13 3:52 ` Grant Likely
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2012-03-13 3:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Abraham, linux-samsung-soc
Cc: rob.herring, kgene.kim, linux-arm-kernel, patches
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:03:26 +0530, Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@linaro.org> wrote:
> Add device tree based instantiation of the interrupt combiner controller.
>
> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
> Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>
> ---
> @@ -406,13 +432,33 @@ void __init combiner_init(void __iomem *combiner_base, struct device_node *np)
>
> for (i = 0; i < MAX_COMBINER_NR; i++) {
> combiner_init_one(i, combiner_base + (i >> 2) * 0x10);
> - combiner_cascade_irq(i, IRQ_SPI(i));
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> + irq = np ? irq_of_parse_and_map(np, i) : IRQ_SPI(i);
> +#else
> + irq = IRQ_SPI(i);
> +#endif
Hmmm, the #ifdef is rather ugly. I'd rather have an empty
irq_of_parse_and_map() that always returns 0.
The patch series is fine, and you can add my acked-by, but please send
a follow-up patch to clean it up.
Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [PATCH v4 2/2] ARM: Exynos: Add device tree support for interrupt combiner
@ 2012-03-13 3:52 ` Grant Likely
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2012-03-13 3:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:03:26 +0530, Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@linaro.org> wrote:
> Add device tree based instantiation of the interrupt combiner controller.
>
> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
> Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>
> ---
> @@ -406,13 +432,33 @@ void __init combiner_init(void __iomem *combiner_base, struct device_node *np)
>
> for (i = 0; i < MAX_COMBINER_NR; i++) {
> combiner_init_one(i, combiner_base + (i >> 2) * 0x10);
> - combiner_cascade_irq(i, IRQ_SPI(i));
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> + irq = np ? irq_of_parse_and_map(np, i) : IRQ_SPI(i);
> +#else
> + irq = IRQ_SPI(i);
> +#endif
Hmmm, the #ifdef is rather ugly. I'd rather have an empty
irq_of_parse_and_map() that always returns 0.
The patch series is fine, and you can add my acked-by, but please send
a follow-up patch to clean it up.
Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] ARM: Exynos: Add device tree support for interrupt combiner
2012-03-13 3:52 ` Grant Likely
@ 2012-03-13 6:46 ` Thomas Abraham
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Abraham @ 2012-03-13 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Grant Likely
Cc: linux-samsung-soc, rob.herring, kgene.kim, linux-arm-kernel,
patches
On 13 March 2012 09:22, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:03:26 +0530, Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Add device tree based instantiation of the interrupt combiner controller.
>>
>> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
>> Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> @@ -406,13 +432,33 @@ void __init combiner_init(void __iomem *combiner_base, struct device_node *np)
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < MAX_COMBINER_NR; i++) {
>> combiner_init_one(i, combiner_base + (i >> 2) * 0x10);
>> - combiner_cascade_irq(i, IRQ_SPI(i));
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>> + irq = np ? irq_of_parse_and_map(np, i) : IRQ_SPI(i);
>> +#else
>> + irq = IRQ_SPI(i);
>> +#endif
>
> Hmmm, the #ifdef is rather ugly. I'd rather have an empty
> irq_of_parse_and_map() that always returns 0.
>
> The patch series is fine, and you can add my acked-by, but please send
> a follow-up patch to clean it up.
>
> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
>
Thanks. I will send a follow-up to clean it.
Regards,
Thomas.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [PATCH v4 2/2] ARM: Exynos: Add device tree support for interrupt combiner
@ 2012-03-13 6:46 ` Thomas Abraham
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Abraham @ 2012-03-13 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 13 March 2012 09:22, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:03:26 +0530, Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Add device tree based instantiation of the interrupt combiner controller.
>>
>> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
>> Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> @@ -406,13 +432,33 @@ void __init combiner_init(void __iomem *combiner_base, struct device_node *np)
>>
>> ? ? ? for (i = 0; i < MAX_COMBINER_NR; i++) {
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? combiner_init_one(i, combiner_base + (i >> 2) * 0x10);
>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? combiner_cascade_irq(i, IRQ_SPI(i));
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? irq = np ? irq_of_parse_and_map(np, i) : IRQ_SPI(i);
>> +#else
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? irq = IRQ_SPI(i);
>> +#endif
>
> Hmmm, the #ifdef is rather ugly. ?I'd rather have an empty
> irq_of_parse_and_map() that always returns 0.
>
> The patch series is fine, and you can add my acked-by, but please send
> a follow-up patch to clean it up.
>
> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
>
Thanks. I will send a follow-up to clean it.
Regards,
Thomas.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] ARM: Exynos: Add irq_domain and device tree support for combiner
2012-02-21 4:33 ` Thomas Abraham
@ 2012-03-12 21:07 ` Thomas Abraham
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Abraham @ 2012-03-12 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-samsung-soc
Cc: rob.herring, grant.likely, kgene.kim, linux-arm-kernel, patches
Hi Rob/Grant,
On 21 February 2012 10:03, Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@linaro.org> wrote:
> Changes since v3:
> - In dt case, the use of fixed gic linux irq number to map the combiner
> interrupt output is removed. This is replaced with the interrupt number
> obtained from the gic irq domain. (Thanks to Rob Herring and Grant
> Likely for this suggestion).
> - Split the patch into two parts - irq_domain and device tree support
> addition.
>
> Changes since v2:
> - Rebased to Grant's irqdomain/next branch.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Includes all changes suggested by Rob Herring.
> - Tested with SPARSE_IRQ enabled.
>
> This patchset adds irq_domain and device tree support for the Exynos Interrupt
> Combiner controller.
>
> The first patch adds a common irq domain for the interrupts managed by the
> interrupt combiners. All the instances of irq combiner reference the common irq
> domain for translating hardware interrupts to linux irq number.
>
> The second patch adds a interrupt specifier translator to support device tree
> based instantiation. It can translate interrupt specifiers for device nodes
> which use combiner as their interrupt parent.
>
> This patchset is based on
> http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git [for-next]
>
> with all irq_domain (v5) patches merged from
> http://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6.git [irqdomain/next]
>
> Thomas Abraham (2):
> ARM: Exynos: Add irq_domain support for interrupt combiner
> ARM: Exynos: Add device tree support for interrupt combiner
Any comments on this patch series? If it helps, I can repost this
patch series. This patch series is a pre-requsite for the irq-domain
and dt support for wakeup interrupts, which Rob has acked.
Thanks,
Thomas.
>
> .../bindings/arm/samsung/interrupt-combiner.txt | 48 +++++++++
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/interrupt-combiner.txt
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 0/2] ARM: Exynos: Add irq_domain and device tree support for combiner
@ 2012-03-12 21:07 ` Thomas Abraham
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Abraham @ 2012-03-12 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hi Rob/Grant,
On 21 February 2012 10:03, Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@linaro.org> wrote:
> Changes since v3:
> - In dt case, the use of fixed gic linux irq number to map the combiner
> ?interrupt output is removed. This is replaced with the interrupt number
> ?obtained from the gic irq domain. (Thanks to Rob Herring and Grant
> ?Likely for this suggestion).
> - Split the patch into two parts - irq_domain and device tree support
> ?addition.
>
> Changes since v2:
> - Rebased to Grant's irqdomain/next branch.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Includes all changes suggested by Rob Herring.
> - Tested with SPARSE_IRQ enabled.
>
> This patchset adds irq_domain and device tree support for the Exynos Interrupt
> Combiner controller.
>
> The first patch adds a common irq domain for the interrupts managed by the
> interrupt combiners. All the instances of irq combiner reference the common irq
> domain for translating hardware interrupts to linux irq number.
>
> The second patch adds a interrupt specifier translator to support device tree
> based instantiation. It can translate interrupt specifiers for device nodes
> which use combiner as their interrupt parent.
>
> This patchset is based on
> http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git [for-next]
>
> with all irq_domain (v5) patches merged from
> http://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6.git [irqdomain/next]
>
> Thomas Abraham (2):
> ?ARM: Exynos: Add irq_domain support for interrupt combiner
> ?ARM: Exynos: Add device tree support for interrupt combiner
Any comments on this patch series? If it helps, I can repost this
patch series. This patch series is a pre-requsite for the irq-domain
and dt support for wakeup interrupts, which Rob has acked.
Thanks,
Thomas.
>
> ?.../bindings/arm/samsung/interrupt-combiner.txt ? ?| ? 48 +++++++++
> ?arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?| ?112 ++++++++++++++++----
> ?2 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> ?create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/interrupt-combiner.txt
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at ?http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] ARM: Exynos: Add irq_domain and device tree support for combiner
2012-02-21 4:33 ` Thomas Abraham
@ 2012-03-13 1:34 ` Rob Herring
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2012-03-13 1:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Abraham
Cc: linux-samsung-soc, grant.likely, kgene.kim, linux-arm-kernel,
rob.herring, patches
On 02/20/2012 10:33 PM, Thomas Abraham wrote:
> Changes since v3:
> - In dt case, the use of fixed gic linux irq number to map the combiner
> interrupt output is removed. This is replaced with the interrupt number
> obtained from the gic irq domain. (Thanks to Rob Herring and Grant
> Likely for this suggestion).
> - Split the patch into two parts - irq_domain and device tree support
> addition.
>
> Changes since v2:
> - Rebased to Grant's irqdomain/next branch.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Includes all changes suggested by Rob Herring.
> - Tested with SPARSE_IRQ enabled.
>
> This patchset adds irq_domain and device tree support for the Exynos Interrupt
> Combiner controller.
>
> The first patch adds a common irq domain for the interrupts managed by the
> interrupt combiners. All the instances of irq combiner reference the common irq
> domain for translating hardware interrupts to linux irq number.
>
> The second patch adds a interrupt specifier translator to support device tree
> based instantiation. It can translate interrupt specifiers for device nodes
> which use combiner as their interrupt parent.
>
> This patchset is based on
> http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git [for-next]
>
> with all irq_domain (v5) patches merged from
> http://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6.git [irqdomain/next]
>
> Thomas Abraham (2):
> ARM: Exynos: Add irq_domain support for interrupt combiner
> ARM: Exynos: Add device tree support for interrupt combiner
>
> .../bindings/arm/samsung/interrupt-combiner.txt | 48 +++++++++
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/interrupt-combiner.txt
Acked-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Rob
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 0/2] ARM: Exynos: Add irq_domain and device tree support for combiner
@ 2012-03-13 1:34 ` Rob Herring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2012-03-13 1:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 02/20/2012 10:33 PM, Thomas Abraham wrote:
> Changes since v3:
> - In dt case, the use of fixed gic linux irq number to map the combiner
> interrupt output is removed. This is replaced with the interrupt number
> obtained from the gic irq domain. (Thanks to Rob Herring and Grant
> Likely for this suggestion).
> - Split the patch into two parts - irq_domain and device tree support
> addition.
>
> Changes since v2:
> - Rebased to Grant's irqdomain/next branch.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Includes all changes suggested by Rob Herring.
> - Tested with SPARSE_IRQ enabled.
>
> This patchset adds irq_domain and device tree support for the Exynos Interrupt
> Combiner controller.
>
> The first patch adds a common irq domain for the interrupts managed by the
> interrupt combiners. All the instances of irq combiner reference the common irq
> domain for translating hardware interrupts to linux irq number.
>
> The second patch adds a interrupt specifier translator to support device tree
> based instantiation. It can translate interrupt specifiers for device nodes
> which use combiner as their interrupt parent.
>
> This patchset is based on
> http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git [for-next]
>
> with all irq_domain (v5) patches merged from
> http://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6.git [irqdomain/next]
>
> Thomas Abraham (2):
> ARM: Exynos: Add irq_domain support for interrupt combiner
> ARM: Exynos: Add device tree support for interrupt combiner
>
> .../bindings/arm/samsung/interrupt-combiner.txt | 48 +++++++++
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/interrupt-combiner.txt
Acked-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Rob
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread