Re: oe-core layer including support for i.MX28

[Alex J Lennon <ajlennon@dynamicdevices.co.uk>]

>That said, I do believe you ought to check if your changes cannot be made generic

Will try to keep in mind.

>Please complain at them ... this is the only way to revert it.

I'll keep on at them :) Anything not to have to go back to LTIB... ;)

Alex

On 15/03/2012 17:21, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 14:16, Alex J Lennon
> <ajlennon@dynamicdevices.co.uk>  wrote:
>>> I think the first solution is better and that custom boards should be added
>>> to custom layers
>> Hmmm ok, thanks That being the case it may be better for me to migrate my
>> recipes from
>> the oe-classic codebase into a new layer created from scratch. It'll be
>> quicker and easier for
>> me that way but perhaps less generic.
> I think many things can be merged back but it is better to have custom
> boards in specific layers that inherit meta-fsl-arm. That said, I do
> believe you ought to check if your changes cannot be made generic
> (ofthenly it can be done) and this could allow it to be merged here.
>
>> (Although my understanding was that Freescale have no intention of providing
>> Linux support related
>>   to OpenEmbedded at this time? Or at least that's what they are telling me
>> :)
> Please complain at them ... this is the only way to revert it. Some
> individuals are working with OpenEmbedded/Yocto and it might end
> changing the Freescale's position if we can enough community support
> and complains at them :-)
>