From: Alex J Lennon <ajlennon@dynamicdevices.co.uk>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Modified fetch() checksums to be correct for libpng 1.4.28 released 15/3/12 (current) instead of previous 8/3/12 release
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:16:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F72E4F9.5080402@dynamicdevices.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACW_hTZ1Bu7X12=BLq+dfX-xHQzy829_w-fjwDX0VEeSTuBw7Q@mail.gmail.com>
>You mean upstream changed their source tarball (or whatever) without
That's correct. I compared my cached tar.bz2 with what's current from
their SRC_URI
and sure enough there are differences, the most obvious being they've
changed the
dates I reference. Yuk indeed, but it happens not infrequently I believe?
>Guess we might want to mirror a version and pull from the mirror.
I think that would be an excellent idea.
Cheers,
Alex
On 28/03/2012 09:34, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
> 2012/3/28<ajlennon@dynamicdevices.co.uk>:
>> From: Alex J Lennon<ajlennon@gmail.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex J Lennon<ajlennon@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> recipes/libpng/libpng_1.2.48.bb | 4 ++--
>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/recipes/libpng/libpng_1.2.48.bb b/recipes/libpng/libpng_1.2.48.bb
>> index 50a3c03..534962d 100644
>> --- a/recipes/libpng/libpng_1.2.48.bb
>> +++ b/recipes/libpng/libpng_1.2.48.bb
>> @@ -2,5 +2,5 @@ require libpng.inc
>>
>> PR = "${INC_PR}.0"
>>
>> -SRC_URI[libpng.md5sum] = "7612af5660cd4b5e8c433ce53bea01a7"
>> -SRC_URI[libpng.sha256sum] = "f6db51aff81b6920203678b29e8c68a5e3703cf5b39ae5e9e56370d17f31b1c4"
>> +SRC_URI[libpng.md5sum] = "74c8c261bdf9a75274e22875183fda07"
>> +SRC_URI[libpng.sha256sum] = "b4c92df11eadf3e81705a58253dbffc4b95169186899e28abdfc8aada8a20fcc"
>> --
>> 1.7.5.4
>>
> You mean upstream changed their source tarball (or whatever) without
> updating the version number.
> Yuk.
>
> Guess we might want to mirror a version and pull from the mirror.
> (changing the checksum alone creates issues because other people might
> already have the version with the old checksum in their downloads.
>
> Frans
>
> PS: thinking of it: we might be able to resolve the latter issue by
> forcing the removal of a file from downloads (and trigger a refetch)
> if the .md5 does not match the md5 in the recipe.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-28 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-27 22:47 [PATCH] Modified fetch() checksums to be correct for libpng 1.4.28 released 15/3/12 (current) instead of previous 8/3/12 release ajlennon
2012-03-28 8:34 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2012-03-28 10:16 ` Alex J Lennon [this message]
2012-03-28 19:39 ` Alex J Lennon
2012-03-28 19:45 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-03-28 19:50 ` Alex J Lennon
2012-03-28 20:32 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-03-28 20:38 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F72E4F9.5080402@dynamicdevices.co.uk \
--to=ajlennon@dynamicdevices.co.uk \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.