Re: [PATCH] Modified fetch() checksums to be correct for libpng 1.4.28 released 15/3/12 (current) instead of previous 8/3/12 release

[Alex J Lennon <ajlennon@dynamicdevices.co.uk>]

Paul,

>FYI, I'm pretty sure that fetch2 from the version of bitbake we use with OE-

I thought it might. Does it still do that if the checksum fails though?

>Of course that's assuming there is a mirror available.

I'm happy to host a 2nd copy and mod the .bb to add another source if 
that helps (the
libpng repo seems to have a history of deleting versions from what I saw 
of the patch
history so it might be a good idea?). Is that ok for everybody?

Cheers,

Alex

On 28/03/2012 20:45, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 March 2012 10:34:16 Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
>> PS: thinking of it: we might be able to resolve the latter issue by
>> forcing the removal of a file from downloads (and trigger a refetch)
>> if the .md5 does not match the md5 in the recipe.
> FYI, I'm pretty sure that fetch2 from the version of bitbake we use with OE-
> Core will skip to the next available option (mirror) if the downloaded file
> doesn't match the SRC_URI checksum. Of course that's assuming there is a
> mirror available.
>
> Cheers,
> Paul
>