From: robherring2@gmail.com (Rob Herring)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL 0/5] Second batch of arm-soc changes
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:26:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F731FAA.5040708@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1332918842-13521-1-git-send-email-olof@lixom.net>
On 03/28/2012 02:13 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> Here is the second batch of arm-soc changes for this merge window. As Arnd
> mentioned with the first cover letter, most of these either had external
> dependencies that have now been pulled in, or just needed a bit more
> linux-next bake time due to getting picked up close to the 3.3 release.
>
>
> There are 128 non-merge patches, with a total diffstat of:
>
> 346 files changed, 10790 insertions(+), 2792 deletions(-)
>
> So, while there's been some good cleanups especially in the first branch,
> there's been a net addition of code:
>
> * New SoC family support for Samsung EXYNOS5250: clock tables, driver
> updates, etc means net gain in code.
> * Added device tree conversions. Once we start to sunset non-device tree
> boards on the enabled platforms, we should see payback in code removal.
> * Common clock framework. As SoCs get converted over to the framework,
> we should see more code removal from this as well.
>
>
> There are a handful of merge conflicts on the branches, nothing that
> should be too messy to sort out. I've described each conflict in the
> corresponding pull request, including how we've resolved them in our
> for-next branch.
>
Why isn't lakml getting copied on emails 1-5? The same thing happened
with Arnd's pull request. Are they getting hung up for moderator approval?
Rob
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
arm@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 0/5] Second batch of arm-soc changes
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:26:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F731FAA.5040708@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1332918842-13521-1-git-send-email-olof@lixom.net>
On 03/28/2012 02:13 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> Here is the second batch of arm-soc changes for this merge window. As Arnd
> mentioned with the first cover letter, most of these either had external
> dependencies that have now been pulled in, or just needed a bit more
> linux-next bake time due to getting picked up close to the 3.3 release.
>
>
> There are 128 non-merge patches, with a total diffstat of:
>
> 346 files changed, 10790 insertions(+), 2792 deletions(-)
>
> So, while there's been some good cleanups especially in the first branch,
> there's been a net addition of code:
>
> * New SoC family support for Samsung EXYNOS5250: clock tables, driver
> updates, etc means net gain in code.
> * Added device tree conversions. Once we start to sunset non-device tree
> boards on the enabled platforms, we should see payback in code removal.
> * Common clock framework. As SoCs get converted over to the framework,
> we should see more code removal from this as well.
>
>
> There are a handful of merge conflicts on the branches, nothing that
> should be too messy to sort out. I've described each conflict in the
> corresponding pull request, including how we've resolved them in our
> for-next branch.
>
Why isn't lakml getting copied on emails 1-5? The same thing happened
with Arnd's pull request. Are they getting hung up for moderator approval?
Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-28 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-28 7:13 [GIT PULL 0/5] Second batch of arm-soc changes Olof Johansson
2012-03-28 7:13 ` Olof Johansson
2012-03-28 7:13 ` [GIT PULL 1/5] ARM: cleanups of io includes Olof Johansson
2012-03-28 8:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-28 8:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-28 9:05 ` Olof Johansson
2012-03-28 9:05 ` Olof Johansson
2012-03-28 12:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-28 12:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-28 19:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-28 19:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-30 0:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-30 0:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-30 0:27 ` Olof Johansson
2012-03-30 0:27 ` Olof Johansson
2012-03-30 0:34 ` Olof Johansson
2012-03-30 0:34 ` Olof Johansson
2012-03-28 7:13 ` [GIT PULL 2/5] ARM: More SoC driver updates Olof Johansson
2012-03-28 7:14 ` [GIT PULL 3/5] ARM: More SoC support updates Olof Johansson
2012-03-28 7:14 ` [GIT PULL 4/5] ARM: More device tree " Olof Johansson
2012-03-28 19:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-28 19:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-28 20:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-28 20:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-28 7:14 ` [GIT PULL 5/5] drivers/clk: common clock framework Olof Johansson
2012-03-28 14:26 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2012-03-28 14:26 ` [GIT PULL 0/5] Second batch of arm-soc changes Rob Herring
2012-03-28 14:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-28 14:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F731FAA.5040708@gmail.com \
--to=robherring2@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.