Re: [PATCH 1/3] [BUGFIX] memcg/tcp : fix to see use_hierarchy in tcp memcontrol cgroup

[KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>]

(2012/03/29 18:14), Glauber Costa wrote:

> On 03/29/2012 09:03 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>>
>> Now, tcp memory control cgroup ignores memcg's use_hierarchy value
>> and act as use_hierarchy=1 always. After this patch, tcp memcontrol will
>> work as memcg is designed.
>>
>> Note:
>>     I know there is a discussion to remove use_hierarchy but this is BUG, now.
>>
> 
> Kame,
> 
> Are you sure about that?
> 
> I just tried it myself, and it seems to work:
> 
> root@inf5072-11:~/glommer-temporary/a/b# cat memory.kmem.tcp.usage_in_bytes
> 724992
> root@inf5072-11:~/glommer-temporary/a/b# cat
> ../memory.kmem.tcp.usage_in_bytes
> 0
> 
> 
> Did you got this conclusion through testing or code inspection?
> 
> As a matter of fact, that's why I believe the current behavior is indeed
> correct:
> 
> the res_counter is initialized as:
> 
>         parent_cg = tcp_prot.proto_cgroup(parent);
>         if (parent_cg)
>                 res_parent = parent_cg->memory_allocated;
> 
>         res_counter_init(&tcp->tcp_memory_allocated, res_parent);
> 
> now, parent is drawn from parent_mem_cgroup(), that reads as follows:
> 
> struct mem_cgroup *parent_mem_cgroup(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> {
>         if (!memcg->res.parent)
>                 return NULL;
>         return mem_cgroup_from_res_counter(memcg->res.parent, res);
> }
> 
> 
> so if we have use_hierarchy = 0, res.parent should be NULL (because that
> is the way we initialize it)
> 


Ah, sorry. you're right. please forget this patch.

To be honest, I wrote this after seeing WARN_ON in patch 2 and 3 and
misunderstood the code at writing patch 2 and 3.

Thanks,
-Kame