All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH 3/3] memcg/tcp: ignore tcp usage before accounting started
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:21:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F742983.1080402@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F740AEF.7090900@jp.fujitsu.com>

On 03/29/2012 09:10 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> tcp memcontrol starts accouting after res->limit is set. So, if a sockets
> starts before setting res->limit, there are already used resource.
> After setting res->limit, the resource (already used) will be uncharged and
> make res_counter below 0 because they are not charged. This causes warning.
> 
> This patch fixes that by adding res_counter_uncharge_nowarn().
> (*) We cannot avoid this while we have 'account start' switch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki<kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

Fine by me.

Acked-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-29  9:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-29  7:01 [BUGFIX][PATCH 0/3] memcg: tcp memcontrol fixes KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-29  7:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] [BUGFIX] memcg/tcp : fix to see use_hierarchy in tcp memcontrol cgroup KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-29  9:14   ` Glauber Costa
2012-03-29  9:16     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-29  7:07 ` [BUGFIX][PATCH 2/3] memcg/tcp: remove static_branch_slow_dec() at changing limit KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-29 10:58   ` Glauber Costa
2012-03-29 23:51     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-30  6:18       ` Glauber Costa
2012-03-29  7:10 ` [BUGFIX][PATCH 3/3] memcg/tcp: ignore tcp usage before accounting started KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-29  9:21   ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2012-03-30  1:44     ` [PATCH] memcg/tcp: fix warning caused b res->usage go to negative KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-06 15:49       ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-10  2:37         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-10  2:51           ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-10  3:01             ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-10  4:15               ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-11  2:22                 ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-10  3:21             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-13 17:33           ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-18  8:02             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-18 16:32               ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-02  3:41     ` [BUGFIX][PATCH 3/3] memcg/tcp: ignore tcp usage before accounting started David Miller
2012-04-03 22:31       ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-09  0:58         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-09  1:44           ` Glauber Costa
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-03-29  6:22 [BUGFIX][PATCH 0/3] memcg: tcp memcontrol fixes KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-03-29  6:31 ` [BUGFIX][PATCH 3/3] memcg/tcp: ignore tcp usage before accounting started KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F742983.1080402@parallels.com \
    --to=glommer@parallels.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.