live migration between qemu-kvm 1.0 and 0.15

live migration between qemu-kvm 1.0 and 0.15

[Vasilis Liaskovitis]

Hi,

is live migration between qemu-kvm stable-0.15 and stable-1.0 trees possible?
When I live migrate a VM from 1.0 to 0.15, the destination side 0.15 qemu-kvm
exits with:
(qemu) Unknown savevm section or instance 'i8259' 0

That's expected, since commit "i8259:convert to qdev" 747c70af78f7088f182c87e683bdf847beead1e4
introduces the i8259 device in the qdev tree.

The other direction (live migrate from 0.15.1 to 1.0.0) seems to work fine.
Are any other issues expected in this direction?

The vmstate for i8259 has not changed between these trees afaict. If the
qdev-ified i8259 is reverted from stable-1.0 tree (to restore live-migration
compatibility between the versions), would you expect problems?

thanks,

- Vasilis

[Qemu-devel] live migration between qemu-kvm 1.0 and 0.15

[Vasilis Liaskovitis]

Hi,

is live migration between qemu-kvm stable-0.15 and stable-1.0 trees possible?
When I live migrate a VM from 1.0 to 0.15, the destination side 0.15 qemu-kvm
exits with:
(qemu) Unknown savevm section or instance 'i8259' 0

That's expected, since commit "i8259:convert to qdev" 747c70af78f7088f182c87e683bdf847beead1e4
introduces the i8259 device in the qdev tree.

The other direction (live migrate from 0.15.1 to 1.0.0) seems to work fine.
Are any other issues expected in this direction?

The vmstate for i8259 has not changed between these trees afaict. If the
qdev-ified i8259 is reverted from stable-1.0 tree (to restore live-migration
compatibility between the versions), would you expect problems?

thanks,

- Vasilis

Re: live migration between qemu-kvm 1.0 and 0.15

[Jan Kiszka]

On 2012-03-27 10:55, Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> is live migration between qemu-kvm stable-0.15 and stable-1.0 trees possible?
> When I live migrate a VM from 1.0 to 0.15, the destination side 0.15 qemu-kvm
> exits with:
> (qemu) Unknown savevm section or instance 'i8259' 0
> 
> That's expected, since commit "i8259:convert to qdev" 747c70af78f7088f182c87e683bdf847beead1e4
> introduces the i8259 device in the qdev tree.
> 
> The other direction (live migrate from 0.15.1 to 1.0.0) seems to work fine.
> Are any other issues expected in this direction?
> 
> The vmstate for i8259 has not changed between these trees afaict. If the
> qdev-ified i8259 is reverted from stable-1.0 tree (to restore live-migration
> compatibility between the versions), would you expect problems?

The legacy instance IDs used in old versions are not written out by
newer ones. They are just accepted on reading to allow moving forward.
There are more devices in the tree that used those instance IDs, not
only the i8259. Reverting the qdev conversion may reactivate backward
migratability for 1.0->0.15 (unless there are others as well). But that
will definitely be over after 1.1 as inrevertible code depends on the
qdev conversion.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration between qemu-kvm 1.0 and 0.15

[Jan Kiszka]

On 2012-03-27 10:55, Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> is live migration between qemu-kvm stable-0.15 and stable-1.0 trees possible?
> When I live migrate a VM from 1.0 to 0.15, the destination side 0.15 qemu-kvm
> exits with:
> (qemu) Unknown savevm section or instance 'i8259' 0
> 
> That's expected, since commit "i8259:convert to qdev" 747c70af78f7088f182c87e683bdf847beead1e4
> introduces the i8259 device in the qdev tree.
> 
> The other direction (live migrate from 0.15.1 to 1.0.0) seems to work fine.
> Are any other issues expected in this direction?
> 
> The vmstate for i8259 has not changed between these trees afaict. If the
> qdev-ified i8259 is reverted from stable-1.0 tree (to restore live-migration
> compatibility between the versions), would you expect problems?

The legacy instance IDs used in old versions are not written out by
newer ones. They are just accepted on reading to allow moving forward.
There are more devices in the tree that used those instance IDs, not
only the i8259. Reverting the qdev conversion may reactivate backward
migratability for 1.0->0.15 (unless there are others as well). But that
will definitely be over after 1.1 as inrevertible code depends on the
qdev conversion.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

Re: live migration between qemu-kvm 1.0 and 0.15

[Avi Kivity]

On 03/27/2012 11:55 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-03-27 10:55, Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > is live migration between qemu-kvm stable-0.15 and stable-1.0 trees possible?
> > When I live migrate a VM from 1.0 to 0.15, the destination side 0.15 qemu-kvm
> > exits with:
> > (qemu) Unknown savevm section or instance 'i8259' 0
> > 
> > That's expected, since commit "i8259:convert to qdev" 747c70af78f7088f182c87e683bdf847beead1e4
> > introduces the i8259 device in the qdev tree.
> > 
> > The other direction (live migrate from 0.15.1 to 1.0.0) seems to work fine.
> > Are any other issues expected in this direction?
> > 
> > The vmstate for i8259 has not changed between these trees afaict. If the
> > qdev-ified i8259 is reverted from stable-1.0 tree (to restore live-migration
> > compatibility between the versions), would you expect problems?
>
> The legacy instance IDs used in old versions are not written out by
> newer ones. They are just accepted on reading to allow moving forward.
> There are more devices in the tree that used those instance IDs, not
> only the i8259. Reverting the qdev conversion may reactivate backward
> migratability for 1.0->0.15 (unless there are others as well). But that
> will definitely be over after 1.1 as inrevertible code depends on the
> qdev conversion.

Is this true even for -M pc-0.15?

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration between qemu-kvm 1.0 and 0.15

[Avi Kivity]

On 03/27/2012 11:55 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-03-27 10:55, Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > is live migration between qemu-kvm stable-0.15 and stable-1.0 trees possible?
> > When I live migrate a VM from 1.0 to 0.15, the destination side 0.15 qemu-kvm
> > exits with:
> > (qemu) Unknown savevm section or instance 'i8259' 0
> > 
> > That's expected, since commit "i8259:convert to qdev" 747c70af78f7088f182c87e683bdf847beead1e4
> > introduces the i8259 device in the qdev tree.
> > 
> > The other direction (live migrate from 0.15.1 to 1.0.0) seems to work fine.
> > Are any other issues expected in this direction?
> > 
> > The vmstate for i8259 has not changed between these trees afaict. If the
> > qdev-ified i8259 is reverted from stable-1.0 tree (to restore live-migration
> > compatibility between the versions), would you expect problems?
>
> The legacy instance IDs used in old versions are not written out by
> newer ones. They are just accepted on reading to allow moving forward.
> There are more devices in the tree that used those instance IDs, not
> only the i8259. Reverting the qdev conversion may reactivate backward
> migratability for 1.0->0.15 (unless there are others as well). But that
> will definitely be over after 1.1 as inrevertible code depends on the
> qdev conversion.

Is this true even for -M pc-0.15?

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

Re: live migration between qemu-kvm 1.0 and 0.15

[Jan Kiszka]

On 2012-03-27 17:59, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/27/2012 11:55 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-03-27 10:55, Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> is live migration between qemu-kvm stable-0.15 and stable-1.0 trees possible?
>>> When I live migrate a VM from 1.0 to 0.15, the destination side 0.15 qemu-kvm
>>> exits with:
>>> (qemu) Unknown savevm section or instance 'i8259' 0
>>>
>>> That's expected, since commit "i8259:convert to qdev" 747c70af78f7088f182c87e683bdf847beead1e4
>>> introduces the i8259 device in the qdev tree.
>>>
>>> The other direction (live migrate from 0.15.1 to 1.0.0) seems to work fine.
>>> Are any other issues expected in this direction?
>>>
>>> The vmstate for i8259 has not changed between these trees afaict. If the
>>> qdev-ified i8259 is reverted from stable-1.0 tree (to restore live-migration
>>> compatibility between the versions), would you expect problems?
>>
>> The legacy instance IDs used in old versions are not written out by
>> newer ones. They are just accepted on reading to allow moving forward.
>> There are more devices in the tree that used those instance IDs, not
>> only the i8259. Reverting the qdev conversion may reactivate backward
>> migratability for 1.0->0.15 (unless there are others as well). But that
>> will definitely be over after 1.1 as inrevertible code depends on the
>> qdev conversion.
> 
> Is this true even for -M pc-0.15?

Yes. Alias IDs enable modeling according to qdev (back then) for devices
that wrote oddly numbered states in the past and porting them over to
the new format. Adding some compat write-out mode would probably be
feasible but would also require some thoughts and quite a bit work to
integrate this cleanly in vmstate.

I guess this just remained unnoticed because the introduction of the
alias ID concept and first conversions happened at a time when lots of
devices increased their vmstate version anyway.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration between qemu-kvm 1.0 and 0.15

[Jan Kiszka]

On 2012-03-27 17:59, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/27/2012 11:55 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-03-27 10:55, Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> is live migration between qemu-kvm stable-0.15 and stable-1.0 trees possible?
>>> When I live migrate a VM from 1.0 to 0.15, the destination side 0.15 qemu-kvm
>>> exits with:
>>> (qemu) Unknown savevm section or instance 'i8259' 0
>>>
>>> That's expected, since commit "i8259:convert to qdev" 747c70af78f7088f182c87e683bdf847beead1e4
>>> introduces the i8259 device in the qdev tree.
>>>
>>> The other direction (live migrate from 0.15.1 to 1.0.0) seems to work fine.
>>> Are any other issues expected in this direction?
>>>
>>> The vmstate for i8259 has not changed between these trees afaict. If the
>>> qdev-ified i8259 is reverted from stable-1.0 tree (to restore live-migration
>>> compatibility between the versions), would you expect problems?
>>
>> The legacy instance IDs used in old versions are not written out by
>> newer ones. They are just accepted on reading to allow moving forward.
>> There are more devices in the tree that used those instance IDs, not
>> only the i8259. Reverting the qdev conversion may reactivate backward
>> migratability for 1.0->0.15 (unless there are others as well). But that
>> will definitely be over after 1.1 as inrevertible code depends on the
>> qdev conversion.
> 
> Is this true even for -M pc-0.15?

Yes. Alias IDs enable modeling according to qdev (back then) for devices
that wrote oddly numbered states in the past and porting them over to
the new format. Adding some compat write-out mode would probably be
feasible but would also require some thoughts and quite a bit work to
integrate this cleanly in vmstate.

I guess this just remained unnoticed because the introduction of the
alias ID concept and first conversions happened at a time when lots of
devices increased their vmstate version anyway.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration between qemu-kvm 1.0 and 0.15

[Anthony Liguori]

On 03/27/2012 11:22 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-03-27 17:59, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 03/27/2012 11:55 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 2012-03-27 10:55, Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> is live migration between qemu-kvm stable-0.15 and stable-1.0 trees possible?
>>>> When I live migrate a VM from 1.0 to 0.15, the destination side 0.15 qemu-kvm
>>>> exits with:
>>>> (qemu) Unknown savevm section or instance 'i8259' 0
>>>>
>>>> That's expected, since commit "i8259:convert to qdev" 747c70af78f7088f182c87e683bdf847beead1e4
>>>> introduces the i8259 device in the qdev tree.
>>>>
>>>> The other direction (live migrate from 0.15.1 to 1.0.0) seems to work fine.
>>>> Are any other issues expected in this direction?
>>>>
>>>> The vmstate for i8259 has not changed between these trees afaict. If the
>>>> qdev-ified i8259 is reverted from stable-1.0 tree (to restore live-migration
>>>> compatibility between the versions), would you expect problems?
>>>
>>> The legacy instance IDs used in old versions are not written out by
>>> newer ones. They are just accepted on reading to allow moving forward.
>>> There are more devices in the tree that used those instance IDs, not
>>> only the i8259. Reverting the qdev conversion may reactivate backward
>>> migratability for 1.0->0.15 (unless there are others as well). But that
>>> will definitely be over after 1.1 as inrevertible code depends on the
>>> qdev conversion.
>>
>> Is this true even for -M pc-0.15?
>
> Yes. Alias IDs enable modeling according to qdev (back then) for devices
> that wrote oddly numbered states in the past and porting them over to
> the new format. Adding some compat write-out mode would probably be
> feasible but would also require some thoughts and quite a bit work to
> integrate this cleanly in vmstate.
>
> I guess this just remained unnoticed because the introduction of the
> alias ID concept and first conversions happened at a time when lots of
> devices increased their vmstate version anyway.

So, since we're approaching 1.1, we should really discuss release criteria for 
1.1 with respect to live migration.  I'd prefer to avoid surprises in this release.

My expectation is that migration works from:

qemu-1.0 -M 1.0     =>    qemu-1.1 -M 1.1
qemu-1.1 -M 1.0     <=    qemu-1.1 -M 1.0

I would expect that migration works from:

qemu-0.15 -M 0.15   =>   qemu-1.1 -M 0.15

I'm okay if this fails gracefully:

qemu-1.1 -M 0.15    <=   qemu-0.15 -M 0.15

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>
> Jan
>

Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration between qemu-kvm 1.0 and 0.15

[Anthony Liguori]

On 03/27/2012 11:22 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-03-27 17:59, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 03/27/2012 11:55 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 2012-03-27 10:55, Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> is live migration between qemu-kvm stable-0.15 and stable-1.0 trees possible?
>>>> When I live migrate a VM from 1.0 to 0.15, the destination side 0.15 qemu-kvm
>>>> exits with:
>>>> (qemu) Unknown savevm section or instance 'i8259' 0
>>>>
>>>> That's expected, since commit "i8259:convert to qdev" 747c70af78f7088f182c87e683bdf847beead1e4
>>>> introduces the i8259 device in the qdev tree.
>>>>
>>>> The other direction (live migrate from 0.15.1 to 1.0.0) seems to work fine.
>>>> Are any other issues expected in this direction?
>>>>
>>>> The vmstate for i8259 has not changed between these trees afaict. If the
>>>> qdev-ified i8259 is reverted from stable-1.0 tree (to restore live-migration
>>>> compatibility between the versions), would you expect problems?
>>>
>>> The legacy instance IDs used in old versions are not written out by
>>> newer ones. They are just accepted on reading to allow moving forward.
>>> There are more devices in the tree that used those instance IDs, not
>>> only the i8259. Reverting the qdev conversion may reactivate backward
>>> migratability for 1.0->0.15 (unless there are others as well). But that
>>> will definitely be over after 1.1 as inrevertible code depends on the
>>> qdev conversion.
>>
>> Is this true even for -M pc-0.15?
>
> Yes. Alias IDs enable modeling according to qdev (back then) for devices
> that wrote oddly numbered states in the past and porting them over to
> the new format. Adding some compat write-out mode would probably be
> feasible but would also require some thoughts and quite a bit work to
> integrate this cleanly in vmstate.
>
> I guess this just remained unnoticed because the introduction of the
> alias ID concept and first conversions happened at a time when lots of
> devices increased their vmstate version anyway.

So, since we're approaching 1.1, we should really discuss release criteria for 
1.1 with respect to live migration.  I'd prefer to avoid surprises in this release.

My expectation is that migration works from:

qemu-1.0 -M 1.0     =>    qemu-1.1 -M 1.1
qemu-1.1 -M 1.0     <=    qemu-1.1 -M 1.0

I would expect that migration works from:

qemu-0.15 -M 0.15   =>   qemu-1.1 -M 0.15

I'm okay if this fails gracefully:

qemu-1.1 -M 0.15    <=   qemu-0.15 -M 0.15

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>
> Jan
>

Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration between qemu-kvm 1.0 and 0.15

[Avi Kivity]

On 03/27/2012 06:39 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
> So, since we're approaching 1.1, we should really discuss release
> criteria for 1.1 with respect to live migration.  I'd prefer to avoid
> surprises in this release.

Agree strongly.

>
> My expectation is that migration works from:
>
> qemu-1.0 -M 1.0     =>    qemu-1.1 -M 1.1

Why do you expect that?  Maybe you meant -M 1.0 at the end?

> qemu-1.1 -M 1.0     <=    qemu-1.1 -M 1.0
>
> I would expect that migration works from:
>
> qemu-0.15 -M 0.15   =>   qemu-1.1 -M 0.15
>

Ack.

> I'm okay if this fails gracefully:
>
> qemu-1.1 -M 0.15    <=   qemu-0.15 -M 0.15

RHEL has more stringent requirements (going back to its heavily patched
0.12).  I think we should have the infrastructure that allow one to add
the hacks to make this work, even if we don't actually do the compat
work for the release (I think it's fine for qemu to support just one
version going back; and unreasonable to require it to go as far back as
RHEL).

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration between qemu-kvm 1.0 and 0.15

[Avi Kivity]

On 03/27/2012 06:39 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
> So, since we're approaching 1.1, we should really discuss release
> criteria for 1.1 with respect to live migration.  I'd prefer to avoid
> surprises in this release.

Agree strongly.

>
> My expectation is that migration works from:
>
> qemu-1.0 -M 1.0     =>    qemu-1.1 -M 1.1

Why do you expect that?  Maybe you meant -M 1.0 at the end?

> qemu-1.1 -M 1.0     <=    qemu-1.1 -M 1.0
>
> I would expect that migration works from:
>
> qemu-0.15 -M 0.15   =>   qemu-1.1 -M 0.15
>

Ack.

> I'm okay if this fails gracefully:
>
> qemu-1.1 -M 0.15    <=   qemu-0.15 -M 0.15

RHEL has more stringent requirements (going back to its heavily patched
0.12).  I think we should have the infrastructure that allow one to add
the hacks to make this work, even if we don't actually do the compat
work for the release (I think it's fine for qemu to support just one
version going back; and unreasonable to require it to go as far back as
RHEL).

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration between qemu-kvm 1.0 and 0.15

[Anthony Liguori]

On 03/27/2012 11:46 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/27/2012 06:39 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>> So, since we're approaching 1.1, we should really discuss release
>> criteria for 1.1 with respect to live migration.  I'd prefer to avoid
>> surprises in this release.
>
> Agree strongly.
>
>>
>> My expectation is that migration works from:
>>
>> qemu-1.0 -M 1.0     =>     qemu-1.1 -M 1.1
>
> Why do you expect that?  Maybe you meant -M 1.0 at the end?

Sorry, I did mean -M 1.0.

>
>> qemu-1.1 -M 1.0<=    qemu-1.1 -M 1.0
>>
>> I would expect that migration works from:
>>
>> qemu-0.15 -M 0.15   =>    qemu-1.1 -M 0.15
>>
>
> Ack.
>
>> I'm okay if this fails gracefully:
>>
>> qemu-1.1 -M 0.15<=   qemu-0.15 -M 0.15
>
> RHEL has more stringent requirements (going back to its heavily patched
> 0.12).  I think we should have the infrastructure that allow one to add
> the hacks to make this work, even if we don't actually do the compat
> work for the release (I think it's fine for qemu to support just one
> version going back; and unreasonable to require it to go as far back as
> RHEL).

This is reasonable to me.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>

Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration between qemu-kvm 1.0 and 0.15

[Jan Kiszka]

On 2012-03-27 18:49, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 03/27/2012 11:46 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 03/27/2012 06:39 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>
>>> So, since we're approaching 1.1, we should really discuss release
>>> criteria for 1.1 with respect to live migration.  I'd prefer to avoid
>>> surprises in this release.
>>
>> Agree strongly.
>>
>>>
>>> My expectation is that migration works from:
>>>
>>> qemu-1.0 -M 1.0     =>     qemu-1.1 -M 1.1
>>
>> Why do you expect that?  Maybe you meant -M 1.0 at the end?
> 
> Sorry, I did mean -M 1.0.
> 
>>
>>> qemu-1.1 -M 1.0<=    qemu-1.1 -M 1.0
>>>
>>> I would expect that migration works from:
>>>
>>> qemu-0.15 -M 0.15   =>    qemu-1.1 -M 0.15
>>>
>>
>> Ack.
>>
>>> I'm okay if this fails gracefully:
>>>
>>> qemu-1.1 -M 0.15<=   qemu-0.15 -M 0.15
>>
>> RHEL has more stringent requirements (going back to its heavily patched
>> 0.12).  I think we should have the infrastructure that allow one to add
>> the hacks to make this work, even if we don't actually do the compat
>> work for the release (I think it's fine for qemu to support just one
>> version going back; and unreasonable to require it to go as far back as
>> RHEL).
> 
> This is reasonable to me.

Here is a draft to get things written in the old format. Totally
untested and likely borken (written in a hurry). I'll split up if it
works fine.

Jan

diff --git a/hw/fdc.c b/hw/fdc.c
index a0236b7..bf0e59d 100644
--- a/hw/fdc.c
+++ b/hw/fdc.c
@@ -1981,7 +1981,7 @@ static int isabus_fdc_init1(ISADevice *dev)
     isa_init_irq(&isa->busdev, &fdctrl->irq, isairq);
     fdctrl->dma_chann = dma_chann;
 
-    qdev_set_legacy_instance_id(&dev->qdev, iobase, 2);
+    qdev_set_legacy_instance_id(&dev->qdev, iobase, 2, false);
     ret = fdctrl_init_common(fdctrl);
 
     add_boot_device_path(isa->bootindexA, &dev->qdev, "/floppy@0");
@@ -2002,7 +2002,7 @@ static int sysbus_fdc_init1(SysBusDevice *dev)
     qdev_init_gpio_in(&dev->qdev, fdctrl_handle_tc, 1);
     fdctrl->dma_chann = -1;
 
-    qdev_set_legacy_instance_id(&dev->qdev, 0 /* io */, 2); /* FIXME */
+    qdev_set_legacy_instance_id(&dev->qdev, 0 /* io */, 2, false); /* FIXME */
     ret = fdctrl_init_common(fdctrl);
 
     return ret;
@@ -2019,7 +2019,7 @@ static int sun4m_fdc_init1(SysBusDevice *dev)
     qdev_init_gpio_in(&dev->qdev, fdctrl_handle_tc, 1);
 
     fdctrl->sun4m = 1;
-    qdev_set_legacy_instance_id(&dev->qdev, 0 /* io */, 2); /* FIXME */
+    qdev_set_legacy_instance_id(&dev->qdev, 0 /* io */, 2, false); /* FIXME */
     return fdctrl_init_common(fdctrl);
 }
 
diff --git a/hw/i8254_common.c b/hw/i8254_common.c
index a03d7cd..b8d0d55 100644
--- a/hw/i8254_common.c
+++ b/hw/i8254_common.c
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ static int pit_init_common(ISADevice *dev)
 
     isa_register_ioport(dev, &pit->ioports, pit->iobase);
 
-    qdev_set_legacy_instance_id(&dev->qdev, pit->iobase, 2);
+    qdev_set_legacy_instance_id(&dev->qdev, pit->iobase, 2, false);
 
     return 0;
 }
diff --git a/hw/i8259_common.c b/hw/i8259_common.c
index ab3d98b..e37fab6 100644
--- a/hw/i8259_common.c
+++ b/hw/i8259_common.c
@@ -78,7 +78,8 @@ static int pic_init_common(ISADevice *dev)
         isa_register_ioport(NULL, &s->elcr_io, s->elcr_addr);
     }
 
-    qdev_set_legacy_instance_id(&s->dev.qdev, s->iobase, 1);
+    qdev_set_legacy_instance_id(&s->dev.qdev, s->iobase, 1,
+                                s->compat_instance_id);
 
     return 0;
 }
@@ -130,6 +131,8 @@ static Property pic_properties_common[] = {
     DEFINE_PROP_HEX32("elcr_addr", PICCommonState, elcr_addr,  -1),
     DEFINE_PROP_HEX8("elcr_mask", PICCommonState, elcr_mask,  -1),
     DEFINE_PROP_BIT("master", PICCommonState, master,  0, false),
+    DEFINE_PROP_BIT("compat_instance_id", PICCommonState, compat_instance_id,
+                    0, false),
     DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
 };
 
diff --git a/hw/i8259_internal.h b/hw/i8259_internal.h
index 4137b61..a47668d 100644
--- a/hw/i8259_internal.h
+++ b/hw/i8259_internal.h
@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ struct PICCommonState {
     uint32_t master; /* reflects /SP input pin */
     uint32_t iobase;
     uint32_t elcr_addr;
+    uint32_t compat_instance_id;
     MemoryRegion base_io;
     MemoryRegion elcr_io;
 };
diff --git a/hw/mc146818rtc.c b/hw/mc146818rtc.c
index 2b59c36..3b0e07c 100644
--- a/hw/mc146818rtc.c
+++ b/hw/mc146818rtc.c
@@ -697,7 +697,7 @@ static int rtc_initfn(ISADevice *dev)
     memory_region_init_io(&s->io, &cmos_ops, s, "rtc", 2);
     isa_register_ioport(dev, &s->io, base);
 
-    qdev_set_legacy_instance_id(&dev->qdev, base, 2);
+    qdev_set_legacy_instance_id(&dev->qdev, base, 2, false);
     qemu_register_reset(rtc_reset, s);
 
     object_property_add(OBJECT(s), "date", "struct tm",
diff --git a/hw/pc_piix.c b/hw/pc_piix.c
index 3f99f9a..4c8d591 100644
--- a/hw/pc_piix.c
+++ b/hw/pc_piix.c
@@ -386,6 +386,10 @@ static QEMUMachine pc_machine_v1_0 = {
             .driver   = "isa-fdc",
             .property = "check_media_rate",
             .value    = "off",
+        },{
+            .driver   = "i8259",
+            .property = "compat_instance_id",
+            .value    = "on",
         },
         { /* end of list */ }
     },
@@ -405,6 +409,10 @@ static QEMUMachine pc_machine_v0_15 = {
             .driver   = "isa-fdc",
             .property = "check_media_rate",
             .value    = "off",
+        },{
+            .driver   = "i8259",
+            .property = "compat_instance_id",
+            .value    = "on",
         },
         { /* end of list */ }
     },
@@ -449,6 +457,10 @@ static QEMUMachine pc_machine_v0_14 = {
             .driver   = "pc-sysfw",
             .property = "rom_only",
             .value    = stringify(1),
+        },{
+            .driver   = "i8259",
+            .property = "compat_instance_id",
+            .value    = "on",
         },
         { /* end of list */ }
     },
@@ -505,6 +517,10 @@ static QEMUMachine pc_machine_v0_13 = {
             .driver   = "pc-sysfw",
             .property = "rom_only",
             .value    = stringify(1),
+        },{
+            .driver   = "i8259",
+            .property = "compat_instance_id",
+            .value    = "on",
         },
         { /* end of list */ }
     },
@@ -565,6 +581,10 @@ static QEMUMachine pc_machine_v0_12 = {
             .driver   = "pc-sysfw",
             .property = "rom_only",
             .value    = stringify(1),
+        },{
+            .driver   = "i8259",
+            .property = "compat_instance_id",
+            .value    = "on",
         },
         { /* end of list */ }
     }
@@ -633,6 +653,10 @@ static QEMUMachine pc_machine_v0_11 = {
             .driver   = "pc-sysfw",
             .property = "rom_only",
             .value    = stringify(1),
+        },{
+            .driver   = "i8259",
+            .property = "compat_instance_id",
+            .value    = "on",
         },
         { /* end of list */ }
     }
@@ -713,6 +737,10 @@ static QEMUMachine pc_machine_v0_10 = {
             .driver   = "pc-sysfw",
             .property = "rom_only",
             .value    = stringify(1),
+        },{
+            .driver   = "i8259",
+            .property = "compat_instance_id",
+            .value    = "on",
         },
         { /* end of list */ }
     },
diff --git a/hw/qdev.c b/hw/qdev.c
index ee21d90..7f54ecf 100644
--- a/hw/qdev.c
+++ b/hw/qdev.c
@@ -155,7 +155,8 @@ int qdev_init(DeviceState *dev)
     if (qdev_get_vmsd(dev)) {
         vmstate_register_with_alias_id(dev, -1, qdev_get_vmsd(dev), dev,
                                        dev->instance_id_alias,
-                                       dev->alias_required_for_version);
+                                       dev->alias_required_for_version,
+                                       dev->write_alias_id);
     }
     dev->state = DEV_STATE_INITIALIZED;
     if (dev->hotplugged) {
@@ -165,11 +166,13 @@ int qdev_init(DeviceState *dev)
 }
 
 void qdev_set_legacy_instance_id(DeviceState *dev, int alias_id,
-                                 int required_for_version)
+                                 int required_for_version,
+                                 bool write_alias_id)
 {
     assert(dev->state == DEV_STATE_CREATED);
     dev->instance_id_alias = alias_id;
     dev->alias_required_for_version = required_for_version;
+    dev->write_alias_id = write_alias_id;
 }
 
 int qdev_unplug(DeviceState *dev)
diff --git a/hw/qdev.h b/hw/qdev.h
index 9cc3f98..3917020 100644
--- a/hw/qdev.h
+++ b/hw/qdev.h
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ struct DeviceState {
     QTAILQ_ENTRY(DeviceState) sibling;
     int instance_id_alias;
     int alias_required_for_version;
+    bool write_alias_id;
 };
 
 typedef void (*bus_dev_printfn)(Monitor *mon, DeviceState *dev, int indent);
@@ -147,7 +148,8 @@ DeviceState *qdev_device_add(QemuOpts *opts);
 int qdev_init(DeviceState *dev) QEMU_WARN_UNUSED_RESULT;
 void qdev_init_nofail(DeviceState *dev);
 void qdev_set_legacy_instance_id(DeviceState *dev, int alias_id,
-                                 int required_for_version);
+                                 int required_for_version,
+                                 bool write_alias_id);
 int qdev_unplug(DeviceState *dev);
 void qdev_free(DeviceState *dev);
 int qdev_simple_unplug_cb(DeviceState *dev);
diff --git a/hw/serial.c b/hw/serial.c
index c0ee55d..20adf98 100644
--- a/hw/serial.c
+++ b/hw/serial.c
@@ -789,7 +789,7 @@ static int serial_isa_initfn(ISADevice *dev)
     s->baudbase = 115200;
     isa_init_irq(dev, &s->irq, isa->isairq);
     serial_init_core(s);
-    qdev_set_legacy_instance_id(&dev->qdev, isa->iobase, 3);
+    qdev_set_legacy_instance_id(&dev->qdev, isa->iobase, 3, false);
 
     memory_region_init_io(&s->io, &serial_io_ops, s, "serial", 8);
     isa_register_ioport(dev, &s->io, isa->iobase);
diff --git a/savevm.c b/savevm.c
index 12fb209..2f53864 100644
--- a/savevm.c
+++ b/savevm.c
@@ -1179,6 +1179,7 @@ typedef struct SaveStateEntry {
     CompatEntry *compat;
     int no_migrate;
     int is_ram;
+    bool write_alias_id;
 } SaveStateEntry;
 
 
@@ -1316,7 +1317,8 @@ void unregister_savevm(DeviceState *dev, const char *idstr, void *opaque)
 int vmstate_register_with_alias_id(DeviceState *dev, int instance_id,
                                    const VMStateDescription *vmsd,
                                    void *opaque, int alias_id,
-                                   int required_for_version)
+                                   int required_for_version,
+                                   bool write_alias_id)
 {
     SaveStateEntry *se;
 
@@ -1332,6 +1334,7 @@ int vmstate_register_with_alias_id(DeviceState *dev, int instance_id,
     se->opaque = opaque;
     se->vmsd = vmsd;
     se->alias_id = alias_id;
+    se->write_alias_id = write_alias_id;
     se->no_migrate = vmsd->unmigratable;
 
     if (dev && dev->parent_bus && dev->parent_bus->info->get_dev_path) {
@@ -1365,7 +1368,7 @@ int vmstate_register(DeviceState *dev, int instance_id,
                      const VMStateDescription *vmsd, void *opaque)
 {
     return vmstate_register_with_alias_id(dev, instance_id, vmsd,
-                                          opaque, -1, 0);
+                                          opaque, -1, 0, false);
 }
 
 void vmstate_unregister(DeviceState *dev, const VMStateDescription *vmsd,
@@ -1591,7 +1594,7 @@ int qemu_savevm_state_begin(QEMUFile *f, int blk_enable, int shared)
         qemu_put_byte(f, len);
         qemu_put_buffer(f, (uint8_t *)se->idstr, len);
 
-        qemu_put_be32(f, se->instance_id);
+        qemu_put_be32(f, se->write_alias_id ? se->alias_id : se->instance_id);
         qemu_put_be32(f, se->version_id);
 
         ret = se->save_live_state(f, QEMU_VM_SECTION_START, se->opaque);
@@ -1683,7 +1686,7 @@ int qemu_savevm_state_complete(QEMUFile *f)
         qemu_put_byte(f, len);
         qemu_put_buffer(f, (uint8_t *)se->idstr, len);
 
-        qemu_put_be32(f, se->instance_id);
+        qemu_put_be32(f, se->write_alias_id ? se->alias_id : se->instance_id);
         qemu_put_be32(f, se->version_id);
 
         vmstate_save(f, se);
@@ -1762,7 +1765,7 @@ static int qemu_save_device_state(QEMUFile *f)
         qemu_put_byte(f, len);
         qemu_put_buffer(f, (uint8_t *)se->idstr, len);
 
-        qemu_put_be32(f, se->instance_id);
+        qemu_put_be32(f, se->write_alias_id ? se->alias_id : se->instance_id);
         qemu_put_be32(f, se->version_id);
 
         vmstate_save(f, se);
diff --git a/vmstate.h b/vmstate.h
index 82d97ae..34b78d8 100644
--- a/vmstate.h
+++ b/vmstate.h
@@ -605,7 +605,8 @@ int vmstate_register(DeviceState *dev, int instance_id,
 int vmstate_register_with_alias_id(DeviceState *dev, int instance_id,
                                    const VMStateDescription *vmsd,
                                    void *base, int alias_id,
-                                   int required_for_version);
+                                   int required_for_version,
+                                   bool write_alias_id);
 void vmstate_unregister(DeviceState *dev, const VMStateDescription *vmsd,
                         void *opaque);
 

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration between qemu-kvm 1.0 and 0.15

[Jan Kiszka]

On 2012-03-27 18:49, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 03/27/2012 11:46 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 03/27/2012 06:39 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>
>>> So, since we're approaching 1.1, we should really discuss release
>>> criteria for 1.1 with respect to live migration.  I'd prefer to avoid
>>> surprises in this release.
>>
>> Agree strongly.
>>
>>>
>>> My expectation is that migration works from:
>>>
>>> qemu-1.0 -M 1.0     =>     qemu-1.1 -M 1.1
>>
>> Why do you expect that?  Maybe you meant -M 1.0 at the end?
> 
> Sorry, I did mean -M 1.0.
> 
>>
>>> qemu-1.1 -M 1.0<=    qemu-1.1 -M 1.0
>>>
>>> I would expect that migration works from:
>>>
>>> qemu-0.15 -M 0.15   =>    qemu-1.1 -M 0.15
>>>
>>
>> Ack.
>>
>>> I'm okay if this fails gracefully:
>>>
>>> qemu-1.1 -M 0.15<=   qemu-0.15 -M 0.15
>>
>> RHEL has more stringent requirements (going back to its heavily patched
>> 0.12).  I think we should have the infrastructure that allow one to add
>> the hacks to make this work, even if we don't actually do the compat
>> work for the release (I think it's fine for qemu to support just one
>> version going back; and unreasonable to require it to go as far back as
>> RHEL).
> 
> This is reasonable to me.

Here is a draft to get things written in the old format. Totally
untested and likely borken (written in a hurry). I'll split up if it
works fine.

Jan

diff --git a/hw/fdc.c b/hw/fdc.c
index a0236b7..bf0e59d 100644
--- a/hw/fdc.c
+++ b/hw/fdc.c
@@ -1981,7 +1981,7 @@ static int isabus_fdc_init1(ISADevice *dev)
     isa_init_irq(&isa->busdev, &fdctrl->irq, isairq);
     fdctrl->dma_chann = dma_chann;
 
-    qdev_set_legacy_instance_id(&dev->qdev, iobase, 2);
+    qdev_set_legacy_instance_id(&dev->qdev, iobase, 2, false);
     ret = fdctrl_init_common(fdctrl);
 
     add_boot_device_path(isa->bootindexA, &dev->qdev, "/floppy@0");
@@ -2002,7 +2002,7 @@ static int sysbus_fdc_init1(SysBusDevice *dev)
     qdev_init_gpio_in(&dev->qdev, fdctrl_handle_tc, 1);
     fdctrl->dma_chann = -1;
 
-    qdev_set_legacy_instance_id(&dev->qdev, 0 /* io */, 2); /* FIXME */
+    qdev_set_legacy_instance_id(&dev->qdev, 0 /* io */, 2, false); /* FIXME */
     ret = fdctrl_init_common(fdctrl);
 
     return ret;
@@ -2019,7 +2019,7 @@ static int sun4m_fdc_init1(SysBusDevice *dev)
     qdev_init_gpio_in(&dev->qdev, fdctrl_handle_tc, 1);
 
     fdctrl->sun4m = 1;
-    qdev_set_legacy_instance_id(&dev->qdev, 0 /* io */, 2); /* FIXME */
+    qdev_set_legacy_instance_id(&dev->qdev, 0 /* io */, 2, false); /* FIXME */
     return fdctrl_init_common(fdctrl);
 }
 
diff --git a/hw/i8254_common.c b/hw/i8254_common.c
index a03d7cd..b8d0d55 100644
--- a/hw/i8254_common.c
+++ b/hw/i8254_common.c
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ static int pit_init_common(ISADevice *dev)
 
     isa_register_ioport(dev, &pit->ioports, pit->iobase);
 
-    qdev_set_legacy_instance_id(&dev->qdev, pit->iobase, 2);
+    qdev_set_legacy_instance_id(&dev->qdev, pit->iobase, 2, false);
 
     return 0;
 }
diff --git a/hw/i8259_common.c b/hw/i8259_common.c
index ab3d98b..e37fab6 100644
--- a/hw/i8259_common.c
+++ b/hw/i8259_common.c
@@ -78,7 +78,8 @@ static int pic_init_common(ISADevice *dev)
         isa_register_ioport(NULL, &s->elcr_io, s->elcr_addr);
     }
 
-    qdev_set_legacy_instance_id(&s->dev.qdev, s->iobase, 1);
+    qdev_set_legacy_instance_id(&s->dev.qdev, s->iobase, 1,
+                                s->compat_instance_id);
 
     return 0;
 }
@@ -130,6 +131,8 @@ static Property pic_properties_common[] = {
     DEFINE_PROP_HEX32("elcr_addr", PICCommonState, elcr_addr,  -1),
     DEFINE_PROP_HEX8("elcr_mask", PICCommonState, elcr_mask,  -1),
     DEFINE_PROP_BIT("master", PICCommonState, master,  0, false),
+    DEFINE_PROP_BIT("compat_instance_id", PICCommonState, compat_instance_id,
+                    0, false),
     DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
 };
 
diff --git a/hw/i8259_internal.h b/hw/i8259_internal.h
index 4137b61..a47668d 100644
--- a/hw/i8259_internal.h
+++ b/hw/i8259_internal.h
@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ struct PICCommonState {
     uint32_t master; /* reflects /SP input pin */
     uint32_t iobase;
     uint32_t elcr_addr;
+    uint32_t compat_instance_id;
     MemoryRegion base_io;
     MemoryRegion elcr_io;
 };
diff --git a/hw/mc146818rtc.c b/hw/mc146818rtc.c
index 2b59c36..3b0e07c 100644
--- a/hw/mc146818rtc.c
+++ b/hw/mc146818rtc.c
@@ -697,7 +697,7 @@ static int rtc_initfn(ISADevice *dev)
     memory_region_init_io(&s->io, &cmos_ops, s, "rtc", 2);
     isa_register_ioport(dev, &s->io, base);
 
-    qdev_set_legacy_instance_id(&dev->qdev, base, 2);
+    qdev_set_legacy_instance_id(&dev->qdev, base, 2, false);
     qemu_register_reset(rtc_reset, s);
 
     object_property_add(OBJECT(s), "date", "struct tm",
diff --git a/hw/pc_piix.c b/hw/pc_piix.c
index 3f99f9a..4c8d591 100644
--- a/hw/pc_piix.c
+++ b/hw/pc_piix.c
@@ -386,6 +386,10 @@ static QEMUMachine pc_machine_v1_0 = {
             .driver   = "isa-fdc",
             .property = "check_media_rate",
             .value    = "off",
+        },{
+            .driver   = "i8259",
+            .property = "compat_instance_id",
+            .value    = "on",
         },
         { /* end of list */ }
     },
@@ -405,6 +409,10 @@ static QEMUMachine pc_machine_v0_15 = {
             .driver   = "isa-fdc",
             .property = "check_media_rate",
             .value    = "off",
+        },{
+            .driver   = "i8259",
+            .property = "compat_instance_id",
+            .value    = "on",
         },
         { /* end of list */ }
     },
@@ -449,6 +457,10 @@ static QEMUMachine pc_machine_v0_14 = {
             .driver   = "pc-sysfw",
             .property = "rom_only",
             .value    = stringify(1),
+        },{
+            .driver   = "i8259",
+            .property = "compat_instance_id",
+            .value    = "on",
         },
         { /* end of list */ }
     },
@@ -505,6 +517,10 @@ static QEMUMachine pc_machine_v0_13 = {
             .driver   = "pc-sysfw",
             .property = "rom_only",
             .value    = stringify(1),
+        },{
+            .driver   = "i8259",
+            .property = "compat_instance_id",
+            .value    = "on",
         },
         { /* end of list */ }
     },
@@ -565,6 +581,10 @@ static QEMUMachine pc_machine_v0_12 = {
             .driver   = "pc-sysfw",
             .property = "rom_only",
             .value    = stringify(1),
+        },{
+            .driver   = "i8259",
+            .property = "compat_instance_id",
+            .value    = "on",
         },
         { /* end of list */ }
     }
@@ -633,6 +653,10 @@ static QEMUMachine pc_machine_v0_11 = {
             .driver   = "pc-sysfw",
             .property = "rom_only",
             .value    = stringify(1),
+        },{
+            .driver   = "i8259",
+            .property = "compat_instance_id",
+            .value    = "on",
         },
         { /* end of list */ }
     }
@@ -713,6 +737,10 @@ static QEMUMachine pc_machine_v0_10 = {
             .driver   = "pc-sysfw",
             .property = "rom_only",
             .value    = stringify(1),
+        },{
+            .driver   = "i8259",
+            .property = "compat_instance_id",
+            .value    = "on",
         },
         { /* end of list */ }
     },
diff --git a/hw/qdev.c b/hw/qdev.c
index ee21d90..7f54ecf 100644
--- a/hw/qdev.c
+++ b/hw/qdev.c
@@ -155,7 +155,8 @@ int qdev_init(DeviceState *dev)
     if (qdev_get_vmsd(dev)) {
         vmstate_register_with_alias_id(dev, -1, qdev_get_vmsd(dev), dev,
                                        dev->instance_id_alias,
-                                       dev->alias_required_for_version);
+                                       dev->alias_required_for_version,
+                                       dev->write_alias_id);
     }
     dev->state = DEV_STATE_INITIALIZED;
     if (dev->hotplugged) {
@@ -165,11 +166,13 @@ int qdev_init(DeviceState *dev)
 }
 
 void qdev_set_legacy_instance_id(DeviceState *dev, int alias_id,
-                                 int required_for_version)
+                                 int required_for_version,
+                                 bool write_alias_id)
 {
     assert(dev->state == DEV_STATE_CREATED);
     dev->instance_id_alias = alias_id;
     dev->alias_required_for_version = required_for_version;
+    dev->write_alias_id = write_alias_id;
 }
 
 int qdev_unplug(DeviceState *dev)
diff --git a/hw/qdev.h b/hw/qdev.h
index 9cc3f98..3917020 100644
--- a/hw/qdev.h
+++ b/hw/qdev.h
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ struct DeviceState {
     QTAILQ_ENTRY(DeviceState) sibling;
     int instance_id_alias;
     int alias_required_for_version;
+    bool write_alias_id;
 };
 
 typedef void (*bus_dev_printfn)(Monitor *mon, DeviceState *dev, int indent);
@@ -147,7 +148,8 @@ DeviceState *qdev_device_add(QemuOpts *opts);
 int qdev_init(DeviceState *dev) QEMU_WARN_UNUSED_RESULT;
 void qdev_init_nofail(DeviceState *dev);
 void qdev_set_legacy_instance_id(DeviceState *dev, int alias_id,
-                                 int required_for_version);
+                                 int required_for_version,
+                                 bool write_alias_id);
 int qdev_unplug(DeviceState *dev);
 void qdev_free(DeviceState *dev);
 int qdev_simple_unplug_cb(DeviceState *dev);
diff --git a/hw/serial.c b/hw/serial.c
index c0ee55d..20adf98 100644
--- a/hw/serial.c
+++ b/hw/serial.c
@@ -789,7 +789,7 @@ static int serial_isa_initfn(ISADevice *dev)
     s->baudbase = 115200;
     isa_init_irq(dev, &s->irq, isa->isairq);
     serial_init_core(s);
-    qdev_set_legacy_instance_id(&dev->qdev, isa->iobase, 3);
+    qdev_set_legacy_instance_id(&dev->qdev, isa->iobase, 3, false);
 
     memory_region_init_io(&s->io, &serial_io_ops, s, "serial", 8);
     isa_register_ioport(dev, &s->io, isa->iobase);
diff --git a/savevm.c b/savevm.c
index 12fb209..2f53864 100644
--- a/savevm.c
+++ b/savevm.c
@@ -1179,6 +1179,7 @@ typedef struct SaveStateEntry {
     CompatEntry *compat;
     int no_migrate;
     int is_ram;
+    bool write_alias_id;
 } SaveStateEntry;
 
 
@@ -1316,7 +1317,8 @@ void unregister_savevm(DeviceState *dev, const char *idstr, void *opaque)
 int vmstate_register_with_alias_id(DeviceState *dev, int instance_id,
                                    const VMStateDescription *vmsd,
                                    void *opaque, int alias_id,
-                                   int required_for_version)
+                                   int required_for_version,
+                                   bool write_alias_id)
 {
     SaveStateEntry *se;
 
@@ -1332,6 +1334,7 @@ int vmstate_register_with_alias_id(DeviceState *dev, int instance_id,
     se->opaque = opaque;
     se->vmsd = vmsd;
     se->alias_id = alias_id;
+    se->write_alias_id = write_alias_id;
     se->no_migrate = vmsd->unmigratable;
 
     if (dev && dev->parent_bus && dev->parent_bus->info->get_dev_path) {
@@ -1365,7 +1368,7 @@ int vmstate_register(DeviceState *dev, int instance_id,
                      const VMStateDescription *vmsd, void *opaque)
 {
     return vmstate_register_with_alias_id(dev, instance_id, vmsd,
-                                          opaque, -1, 0);
+                                          opaque, -1, 0, false);
 }
 
 void vmstate_unregister(DeviceState *dev, const VMStateDescription *vmsd,
@@ -1591,7 +1594,7 @@ int qemu_savevm_state_begin(QEMUFile *f, int blk_enable, int shared)
         qemu_put_byte(f, len);
         qemu_put_buffer(f, (uint8_t *)se->idstr, len);
 
-        qemu_put_be32(f, se->instance_id);
+        qemu_put_be32(f, se->write_alias_id ? se->alias_id : se->instance_id);
         qemu_put_be32(f, se->version_id);
 
         ret = se->save_live_state(f, QEMU_VM_SECTION_START, se->opaque);
@@ -1683,7 +1686,7 @@ int qemu_savevm_state_complete(QEMUFile *f)
         qemu_put_byte(f, len);
         qemu_put_buffer(f, (uint8_t *)se->idstr, len);
 
-        qemu_put_be32(f, se->instance_id);
+        qemu_put_be32(f, se->write_alias_id ? se->alias_id : se->instance_id);
         qemu_put_be32(f, se->version_id);
 
         vmstate_save(f, se);
@@ -1762,7 +1765,7 @@ static int qemu_save_device_state(QEMUFile *f)
         qemu_put_byte(f, len);
         qemu_put_buffer(f, (uint8_t *)se->idstr, len);
 
-        qemu_put_be32(f, se->instance_id);
+        qemu_put_be32(f, se->write_alias_id ? se->alias_id : se->instance_id);
         qemu_put_be32(f, se->version_id);
 
         vmstate_save(f, se);
diff --git a/vmstate.h b/vmstate.h
index 82d97ae..34b78d8 100644
--- a/vmstate.h
+++ b/vmstate.h
@@ -605,7 +605,8 @@ int vmstate_register(DeviceState *dev, int instance_id,
 int vmstate_register_with_alias_id(DeviceState *dev, int instance_id,
                                    const VMStateDescription *vmsd,
                                    void *base, int alias_id,
-                                   int required_for_version);
+                                   int required_for_version,
+                                   bool write_alias_id);
 void vmstate_unregister(DeviceState *dev, const VMStateDescription *vmsd,
                         void *opaque);
 

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

Re: live migration between qemu-kvm 1.0 and 0.15

[Anthony Liguori]

On 03/27/2012 12:42 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-03-27 18:49, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> On 03/27/2012 11:46 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> On 03/27/2012 06:39 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>>
>>>> So, since we're approaching 1.1, we should really discuss release
>>>> criteria for 1.1 with respect to live migration.  I'd prefer to avoid
>>>> surprises in this release.
>>>
>>> Agree strongly.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> My expectation is that migration works from:
>>>>
>>>> qemu-1.0 -M 1.0     =>      qemu-1.1 -M 1.1
>>>
>>> Why do you expect that?  Maybe you meant -M 1.0 at the end?
>>
>> Sorry, I did mean -M 1.0.
>>
>>>
>>>> qemu-1.1 -M 1.0<=    qemu-1.1 -M 1.0
>>>>
>>>> I would expect that migration works from:
>>>>
>>>> qemu-0.15 -M 0.15   =>     qemu-1.1 -M 0.15
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ack.
>>>
>>>> I'm okay if this fails gracefully:
>>>>
>>>> qemu-1.1 -M 0.15<=   qemu-0.15 -M 0.15
>>>
>>> RHEL has more stringent requirements (going back to its heavily patched
>>> 0.12).  I think we should have the infrastructure that allow one to add
>>> the hacks to make this work, even if we don't actually do the compat
>>> work for the release (I think it's fine for qemu to support just one
>>> version going back; and unreasonable to require it to go as far back as
>>> RHEL).
>>
>> This is reasonable to me.
>
> Here is a draft to get things written in the old format. Totally
> untested and likely borken (written in a hurry). I'll split up if it
> works fine.

I don't really like this as a matter of principle.

Knowingly migrating when the result may be a broken guest is a bug, it's not a 
feature.

It's one thing if we're changing formats for other reasons, but if we're 
changing the format to send what's effectively broken migration state, then 
that's an evil thing to do.

Subsections are the compromise.  We send a subsection when we think migration 
can work and fail gracefully when it can't.  Presumably there's a reason we're 
not using subsections here.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration between qemu-kvm 1.0 and 0.15

[Anthony Liguori]

On 03/27/2012 12:42 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-03-27 18:49, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> On 03/27/2012 11:46 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> On 03/27/2012 06:39 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>>
>>>> So, since we're approaching 1.1, we should really discuss release
>>>> criteria for 1.1 with respect to live migration.  I'd prefer to avoid
>>>> surprises in this release.
>>>
>>> Agree strongly.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> My expectation is that migration works from:
>>>>
>>>> qemu-1.0 -M 1.0     =>      qemu-1.1 -M 1.1
>>>
>>> Why do you expect that?  Maybe you meant -M 1.0 at the end?
>>
>> Sorry, I did mean -M 1.0.
>>
>>>
>>>> qemu-1.1 -M 1.0<=    qemu-1.1 -M 1.0
>>>>
>>>> I would expect that migration works from:
>>>>
>>>> qemu-0.15 -M 0.15   =>     qemu-1.1 -M 0.15
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ack.
>>>
>>>> I'm okay if this fails gracefully:
>>>>
>>>> qemu-1.1 -M 0.15<=   qemu-0.15 -M 0.15
>>>
>>> RHEL has more stringent requirements (going back to its heavily patched
>>> 0.12).  I think we should have the infrastructure that allow one to add
>>> the hacks to make this work, even if we don't actually do the compat
>>> work for the release (I think it's fine for qemu to support just one
>>> version going back; and unreasonable to require it to go as far back as
>>> RHEL).
>>
>> This is reasonable to me.
>
> Here is a draft to get things written in the old format. Totally
> untested and likely borken (written in a hurry). I'll split up if it
> works fine.

I don't really like this as a matter of principle.

Knowingly migrating when the result may be a broken guest is a bug, it's not a 
feature.

It's one thing if we're changing formats for other reasons, but if we're 
changing the format to send what's effectively broken migration state, then 
that's an evil thing to do.

Subsections are the compromise.  We send a subsection when we think migration 
can work and fail gracefully when it can't.  Presumably there's a reason we're 
not using subsections here.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

Re: live migration between qemu-kvm 1.0 and 0.15

[Jan Kiszka]

On 2012-03-29 17:23, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 03/27/2012 12:42 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-03-27 18:49, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> On 03/27/2012 11:46 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>>> On 03/27/2012 06:39 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> So, since we're approaching 1.1, we should really discuss release
>>>>> criteria for 1.1 with respect to live migration.  I'd prefer to avoid
>>>>> surprises in this release.
>>>>
>>>> Agree strongly.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> My expectation is that migration works from:
>>>>>
>>>>> qemu-1.0 -M 1.0     =>      qemu-1.1 -M 1.1
>>>>
>>>> Why do you expect that?  Maybe you meant -M 1.0 at the end?
>>>
>>> Sorry, I did mean -M 1.0.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> qemu-1.1 -M 1.0<=    qemu-1.1 -M 1.0
>>>>>
>>>>> I would expect that migration works from:
>>>>>
>>>>> qemu-0.15 -M 0.15   =>     qemu-1.1 -M 0.15
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ack.
>>>>
>>>>> I'm okay if this fails gracefully:
>>>>>
>>>>> qemu-1.1 -M 0.15<=   qemu-0.15 -M 0.15
>>>>
>>>> RHEL has more stringent requirements (going back to its heavily patched
>>>> 0.12).  I think we should have the infrastructure that allow one to add
>>>> the hacks to make this work, even if we don't actually do the compat
>>>> work for the release (I think it's fine for qemu to support just one
>>>> version going back; and unreasonable to require it to go as far back as
>>>> RHEL).
>>>
>>> This is reasonable to me.
>>
>> Here is a draft to get things written in the old format. Totally
>> untested and likely borken (written in a hurry). I'll split up if it
>> works fine.
> 
> I don't really like this as a matter of principle.
> 
> Knowingly migrating when the result may be a broken guest is a bug, it's not a 
> feature.
> 
> It's one thing if we're changing formats for other reasons, but if we're 
> changing the format to send what's effectively broken migration state, then 
> that's an evil thing to do.
> 
> Subsections are the compromise.  We send a subsection when we think migration 
> can work and fail gracefully when it can't.  Presumably there's a reason we're 
> not using subsections here.

In this case (instance ID), it's actually not about a bug fix but a
consolidation of the vmstate format. So I think it's an exception,
though I don't like the code changes it requires as well.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration between qemu-kvm 1.0 and 0.15

[Jan Kiszka]

On 2012-03-29 17:23, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 03/27/2012 12:42 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-03-27 18:49, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> On 03/27/2012 11:46 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>>> On 03/27/2012 06:39 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> So, since we're approaching 1.1, we should really discuss release
>>>>> criteria for 1.1 with respect to live migration.  I'd prefer to avoid
>>>>> surprises in this release.
>>>>
>>>> Agree strongly.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> My expectation is that migration works from:
>>>>>
>>>>> qemu-1.0 -M 1.0     =>      qemu-1.1 -M 1.1
>>>>
>>>> Why do you expect that?  Maybe you meant -M 1.0 at the end?
>>>
>>> Sorry, I did mean -M 1.0.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> qemu-1.1 -M 1.0<=    qemu-1.1 -M 1.0
>>>>>
>>>>> I would expect that migration works from:
>>>>>
>>>>> qemu-0.15 -M 0.15   =>     qemu-1.1 -M 0.15
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ack.
>>>>
>>>>> I'm okay if this fails gracefully:
>>>>>
>>>>> qemu-1.1 -M 0.15<=   qemu-0.15 -M 0.15
>>>>
>>>> RHEL has more stringent requirements (going back to its heavily patched
>>>> 0.12).  I think we should have the infrastructure that allow one to add
>>>> the hacks to make this work, even if we don't actually do the compat
>>>> work for the release (I think it's fine for qemu to support just one
>>>> version going back; and unreasonable to require it to go as far back as
>>>> RHEL).
>>>
>>> This is reasonable to me.
>>
>> Here is a draft to get things written in the old format. Totally
>> untested and likely borken (written in a hurry). I'll split up if it
>> works fine.
> 
> I don't really like this as a matter of principle.
> 
> Knowingly migrating when the result may be a broken guest is a bug, it's not a 
> feature.
> 
> It's one thing if we're changing formats for other reasons, but if we're 
> changing the format to send what's effectively broken migration state, then 
> that's an evil thing to do.
> 
> Subsections are the compromise.  We send a subsection when we think migration 
> can work and fail gracefully when it can't.  Presumably there's a reason we're 
> not using subsections here.

In this case (instance ID), it's actually not about a bug fix but a
consolidation of the vmstate format. So I think it's an exception,
though I don't like the code changes it requires as well.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration between qemu-kvm 1.0 and 0.15

[Jan Kiszka]

On 2012-03-27 18:39, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 03/27/2012 11:22 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-03-27 17:59, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> On 03/27/2012 11:55 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> On 2012-03-27 10:55, Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> is live migration between qemu-kvm stable-0.15 and stable-1.0 trees possible?
>>>>> When I live migrate a VM from 1.0 to 0.15, the destination side 0.15 qemu-kvm
>>>>> exits with:
>>>>> (qemu) Unknown savevm section or instance 'i8259' 0
>>>>>
>>>>> That's expected, since commit "i8259:convert to qdev" 747c70af78f7088f182c87e683bdf847beead1e4
>>>>> introduces the i8259 device in the qdev tree.
>>>>>
>>>>> The other direction (live migrate from 0.15.1 to 1.0.0) seems to work fine.
>>>>> Are any other issues expected in this direction?
>>>>>
>>>>> The vmstate for i8259 has not changed between these trees afaict. If the
>>>>> qdev-ified i8259 is reverted from stable-1.0 tree (to restore live-migration
>>>>> compatibility between the versions), would you expect problems?
>>>>
>>>> The legacy instance IDs used in old versions are not written out by
>>>> newer ones. They are just accepted on reading to allow moving forward.
>>>> There are more devices in the tree that used those instance IDs, not
>>>> only the i8259. Reverting the qdev conversion may reactivate backward
>>>> migratability for 1.0->0.15 (unless there are others as well). But that
>>>> will definitely be over after 1.1 as inrevertible code depends on the
>>>> qdev conversion.
>>>
>>> Is this true even for -M pc-0.15?
>>
>> Yes. Alias IDs enable modeling according to qdev (back then) for devices
>> that wrote oddly numbered states in the past and porting them over to
>> the new format. Adding some compat write-out mode would probably be
>> feasible but would also require some thoughts and quite a bit work to
>> integrate this cleanly in vmstate.
>>
>> I guess this just remained unnoticed because the introduction of the
>> alias ID concept and first conversions happened at a time when lots of
>> devices increased their vmstate version anyway.
> 
> So, since we're approaching 1.1, we should really discuss release criteria for 
> 1.1 with respect to live migration.  I'd prefer to avoid surprises in this release.
> 
> My expectation is that migration works from:
> 
> qemu-1.0 -M 1.0     =>    qemu-1.1 -M 1.1
> qemu-1.1 -M 1.0     <=    qemu-1.1 -M 1.0

Besides the instance ID thing, I found two further blockers:

 - kvm-tpr-op (kvmvapic), easy to disable in non-1.1 machines

 - vmstate fix for i8254 which involved a version bump from 2 to 3.
   That is actually now compatible with qemu-kvm and should not cause
   troubles there. But it breaks the backward-migration scenario for
   QEMU. I have no good idea how to resolve this while pleasing all
   consumers we care about. Any suggestions?

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration between qemu-kvm 1.0 and 0.15

[Jan Kiszka]

On 2012-03-27 18:39, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 03/27/2012 11:22 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-03-27 17:59, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> On 03/27/2012 11:55 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> On 2012-03-27 10:55, Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> is live migration between qemu-kvm stable-0.15 and stable-1.0 trees possible?
>>>>> When I live migrate a VM from 1.0 to 0.15, the destination side 0.15 qemu-kvm
>>>>> exits with:
>>>>> (qemu) Unknown savevm section or instance 'i8259' 0
>>>>>
>>>>> That's expected, since commit "i8259:convert to qdev" 747c70af78f7088f182c87e683bdf847beead1e4
>>>>> introduces the i8259 device in the qdev tree.
>>>>>
>>>>> The other direction (live migrate from 0.15.1 to 1.0.0) seems to work fine.
>>>>> Are any other issues expected in this direction?
>>>>>
>>>>> The vmstate for i8259 has not changed between these trees afaict. If the
>>>>> qdev-ified i8259 is reverted from stable-1.0 tree (to restore live-migration
>>>>> compatibility between the versions), would you expect problems?
>>>>
>>>> The legacy instance IDs used in old versions are not written out by
>>>> newer ones. They are just accepted on reading to allow moving forward.
>>>> There are more devices in the tree that used those instance IDs, not
>>>> only the i8259. Reverting the qdev conversion may reactivate backward
>>>> migratability for 1.0->0.15 (unless there are others as well). But that
>>>> will definitely be over after 1.1 as inrevertible code depends on the
>>>> qdev conversion.
>>>
>>> Is this true even for -M pc-0.15?
>>
>> Yes. Alias IDs enable modeling according to qdev (back then) for devices
>> that wrote oddly numbered states in the past and porting them over to
>> the new format. Adding some compat write-out mode would probably be
>> feasible but would also require some thoughts and quite a bit work to
>> integrate this cleanly in vmstate.
>>
>> I guess this just remained unnoticed because the introduction of the
>> alias ID concept and first conversions happened at a time when lots of
>> devices increased their vmstate version anyway.
> 
> So, since we're approaching 1.1, we should really discuss release criteria for 
> 1.1 with respect to live migration.  I'd prefer to avoid surprises in this release.
> 
> My expectation is that migration works from:
> 
> qemu-1.0 -M 1.0     =>    qemu-1.1 -M 1.1
> qemu-1.1 -M 1.0     <=    qemu-1.1 -M 1.0

Besides the instance ID thing, I found two further blockers:

 - kvm-tpr-op (kvmvapic), easy to disable in non-1.1 machines

 - vmstate fix for i8254 which involved a version bump from 2 to 3.
   That is actually now compatible with qemu-kvm and should not cause
   troubles there. But it breaks the backward-migration scenario for
   QEMU. I have no good idea how to resolve this while pleasing all
   consumers we care about. Any suggestions?

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration between qemu-kvm 1.0 and 0.15

[Avi Kivity]

On 03/29/2012 01:56 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-03-27 18:39, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > On 03/27/2012 11:22 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> On 2012-03-27 17:59, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >>> On 03/27/2012 11:55 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>>> On 2012-03-27 10:55, Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> is live migration between qemu-kvm stable-0.15 and stable-1.0 trees possible?
> >>>>> When I live migrate a VM from 1.0 to 0.15, the destination side 0.15 qemu-kvm
> >>>>> exits with:
> >>>>> (qemu) Unknown savevm section or instance 'i8259' 0
> >>>>>
> >>>>> That's expected, since commit "i8259:convert to qdev" 747c70af78f7088f182c87e683bdf847beead1e4
> >>>>> introduces the i8259 device in the qdev tree.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The other direction (live migrate from 0.15.1 to 1.0.0) seems to work fine.
> >>>>> Are any other issues expected in this direction?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The vmstate for i8259 has not changed between these trees afaict. If the
> >>>>> qdev-ified i8259 is reverted from stable-1.0 tree (to restore live-migration
> >>>>> compatibility between the versions), would you expect problems?
> >>>>
> >>>> The legacy instance IDs used in old versions are not written out by
> >>>> newer ones. They are just accepted on reading to allow moving forward.
> >>>> There are more devices in the tree that used those instance IDs, not
> >>>> only the i8259. Reverting the qdev conversion may reactivate backward
> >>>> migratability for 1.0->0.15 (unless there are others as well). But that
> >>>> will definitely be over after 1.1 as inrevertible code depends on the
> >>>> qdev conversion.
> >>>
> >>> Is this true even for -M pc-0.15?
> >>
> >> Yes. Alias IDs enable modeling according to qdev (back then) for devices
> >> that wrote oddly numbered states in the past and porting them over to
> >> the new format. Adding some compat write-out mode would probably be
> >> feasible but would also require some thoughts and quite a bit work to
> >> integrate this cleanly in vmstate.
> >>
> >> I guess this just remained unnoticed because the introduction of the
> >> alias ID concept and first conversions happened at a time when lots of
> >> devices increased their vmstate version anyway.
> > 
> > So, since we're approaching 1.1, we should really discuss release criteria for 
> > 1.1 with respect to live migration.  I'd prefer to avoid surprises in this release.
> > 
> > My expectation is that migration works from:
> > 
> > qemu-1.0 -M 1.0     =>    qemu-1.1 -M 1.1
> > qemu-1.1 -M 1.0     <=    qemu-1.1 -M 1.0
>
> Besides the instance ID thing, I found two further blockers:
>
>  - kvm-tpr-op (kvmvapic), easy to disable in non-1.1 machines
>
>  - vmstate fix for i8254 which involved a version bump from 2 to 3.
>    That is actually now compatible with qemu-kvm and should not cause
>    troubles there. But it breaks the backward-migration scenario for
>    QEMU. I have no good idea how to resolve this while pleasing all
>    consumers we care about. Any suggestions?

Option 1: make -M old force an old vmstate to be written out.  Sounds
like a generally useful thing.
Option 2: ask those consumers to issue updates that bring their code up
to version 3.  Require fully updated qemus on both sides.  Easy to
achieve, result is less flexible but reasonable IMO (especially with a
long lead time, which we have).

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration between qemu-kvm 1.0 and 0.15

[Avi Kivity]

On 03/29/2012 01:56 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-03-27 18:39, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > On 03/27/2012 11:22 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> On 2012-03-27 17:59, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >>> On 03/27/2012 11:55 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>>> On 2012-03-27 10:55, Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> is live migration between qemu-kvm stable-0.15 and stable-1.0 trees possible?
> >>>>> When I live migrate a VM from 1.0 to 0.15, the destination side 0.15 qemu-kvm
> >>>>> exits with:
> >>>>> (qemu) Unknown savevm section or instance 'i8259' 0
> >>>>>
> >>>>> That's expected, since commit "i8259:convert to qdev" 747c70af78f7088f182c87e683bdf847beead1e4
> >>>>> introduces the i8259 device in the qdev tree.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The other direction (live migrate from 0.15.1 to 1.0.0) seems to work fine.
> >>>>> Are any other issues expected in this direction?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The vmstate for i8259 has not changed between these trees afaict. If the
> >>>>> qdev-ified i8259 is reverted from stable-1.0 tree (to restore live-migration
> >>>>> compatibility between the versions), would you expect problems?
> >>>>
> >>>> The legacy instance IDs used in old versions are not written out by
> >>>> newer ones. They are just accepted on reading to allow moving forward.
> >>>> There are more devices in the tree that used those instance IDs, not
> >>>> only the i8259. Reverting the qdev conversion may reactivate backward
> >>>> migratability for 1.0->0.15 (unless there are others as well). But that
> >>>> will definitely be over after 1.1 as inrevertible code depends on the
> >>>> qdev conversion.
> >>>
> >>> Is this true even for -M pc-0.15?
> >>
> >> Yes. Alias IDs enable modeling according to qdev (back then) for devices
> >> that wrote oddly numbered states in the past and porting them over to
> >> the new format. Adding some compat write-out mode would probably be
> >> feasible but would also require some thoughts and quite a bit work to
> >> integrate this cleanly in vmstate.
> >>
> >> I guess this just remained unnoticed because the introduction of the
> >> alias ID concept and first conversions happened at a time when lots of
> >> devices increased their vmstate version anyway.
> > 
> > So, since we're approaching 1.1, we should really discuss release criteria for 
> > 1.1 with respect to live migration.  I'd prefer to avoid surprises in this release.
> > 
> > My expectation is that migration works from:
> > 
> > qemu-1.0 -M 1.0     =>    qemu-1.1 -M 1.1
> > qemu-1.1 -M 1.0     <=    qemu-1.1 -M 1.0
>
> Besides the instance ID thing, I found two further blockers:
>
>  - kvm-tpr-op (kvmvapic), easy to disable in non-1.1 machines
>
>  - vmstate fix for i8254 which involved a version bump from 2 to 3.
>    That is actually now compatible with qemu-kvm and should not cause
>    troubles there. But it breaks the backward-migration scenario for
>    QEMU. I have no good idea how to resolve this while pleasing all
>    consumers we care about. Any suggestions?

Option 1: make -M old force an old vmstate to be written out.  Sounds
like a generally useful thing.
Option 2: ask those consumers to issue updates that bring their code up
to version 3.  Require fully updated qemus on both sides.  Easy to
achieve, result is less flexible but reasonable IMO (especially with a
long lead time, which we have).

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration between qemu-kvm 1.0 and 0.15

[Anthony Liguori]

On 03/29/2012 10:17 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/29/2012 01:56 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-03-27 18:39, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> On 03/27/2012 11:22 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> On 2012-03-27 17:59, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>>>> On 03/27/2012 11:55 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>>>> On 2012-03-27 10:55, Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> is live migration between qemu-kvm stable-0.15 and stable-1.0 trees possible?
>>>>>>> When I live migrate a VM from 1.0 to 0.15, the destination side 0.15 qemu-kvm
>>>>>>> exits with:
>>>>>>> (qemu) Unknown savevm section or instance 'i8259' 0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's expected, since commit "i8259:convert to qdev" 747c70af78f7088f182c87e683bdf847beead1e4
>>>>>>> introduces the i8259 device in the qdev tree.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The other direction (live migrate from 0.15.1 to 1.0.0) seems to work fine.
>>>>>>> Are any other issues expected in this direction?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The vmstate for i8259 has not changed between these trees afaict. If the
>>>>>>> qdev-ified i8259 is reverted from stable-1.0 tree (to restore live-migration
>>>>>>> compatibility between the versions), would you expect problems?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The legacy instance IDs used in old versions are not written out by
>>>>>> newer ones. They are just accepted on reading to allow moving forward.
>>>>>> There are more devices in the tree that used those instance IDs, not
>>>>>> only the i8259. Reverting the qdev conversion may reactivate backward
>>>>>> migratability for 1.0->0.15 (unless there are others as well). But that
>>>>>> will definitely be over after 1.1 as inrevertible code depends on the
>>>>>> qdev conversion.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this true even for -M pc-0.15?
>>>>
>>>> Yes. Alias IDs enable modeling according to qdev (back then) for devices
>>>> that wrote oddly numbered states in the past and porting them over to
>>>> the new format. Adding some compat write-out mode would probably be
>>>> feasible but would also require some thoughts and quite a bit work to
>>>> integrate this cleanly in vmstate.
>>>>
>>>> I guess this just remained unnoticed because the introduction of the
>>>> alias ID concept and first conversions happened at a time when lots of
>>>> devices increased their vmstate version anyway.
>>>
>>> So, since we're approaching 1.1, we should really discuss release criteria for
>>> 1.1 with respect to live migration.  I'd prefer to avoid surprises in this release.
>>>
>>> My expectation is that migration works from:
>>>
>>> qemu-1.0 -M 1.0     =>     qemu-1.1 -M 1.1
>>> qemu-1.1 -M 1.0<=    qemu-1.1 -M 1.0
>>
>> Besides the instance ID thing, I found two further blockers:
>>
>>   - kvm-tpr-op (kvmvapic), easy to disable in non-1.1 machines
>>
>>   - vmstate fix for i8254 which involved a version bump from 2 to 3.
>>     That is actually now compatible with qemu-kvm and should not cause
>>     troubles there. But it breaks the backward-migration scenario for
>>     QEMU. I have no good idea how to resolve this while pleasing all
>>     consumers we care about. Any suggestions?
>
> Option 1: make -M old force an old vmstate to be written out.  Sounds
> like a generally useful thing.
> Option 2: ask those consumers to issue updates that bring their code up
> to version 3.  Require fully updated qemus on both sides.  Easy to
> achieve, result is less flexible but reasonable IMO (especially with a
> long lead time, which we have).

I prefer Option 2 presuming the bug is a legitimate bug fix.

If it couldn't be done as a subsection, then there's really no choice IMHO.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>

Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration between qemu-kvm 1.0 and 0.15

[Anthony Liguori]

On 03/29/2012 10:17 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/29/2012 01:56 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-03-27 18:39, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> On 03/27/2012 11:22 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> On 2012-03-27 17:59, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>>>> On 03/27/2012 11:55 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>>>> On 2012-03-27 10:55, Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> is live migration between qemu-kvm stable-0.15 and stable-1.0 trees possible?
>>>>>>> When I live migrate a VM from 1.0 to 0.15, the destination side 0.15 qemu-kvm
>>>>>>> exits with:
>>>>>>> (qemu) Unknown savevm section or instance 'i8259' 0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's expected, since commit "i8259:convert to qdev" 747c70af78f7088f182c87e683bdf847beead1e4
>>>>>>> introduces the i8259 device in the qdev tree.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The other direction (live migrate from 0.15.1 to 1.0.0) seems to work fine.
>>>>>>> Are any other issues expected in this direction?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The vmstate for i8259 has not changed between these trees afaict. If the
>>>>>>> qdev-ified i8259 is reverted from stable-1.0 tree (to restore live-migration
>>>>>>> compatibility between the versions), would you expect problems?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The legacy instance IDs used in old versions are not written out by
>>>>>> newer ones. They are just accepted on reading to allow moving forward.
>>>>>> There are more devices in the tree that used those instance IDs, not
>>>>>> only the i8259. Reverting the qdev conversion may reactivate backward
>>>>>> migratability for 1.0->0.15 (unless there are others as well). But that
>>>>>> will definitely be over after 1.1 as inrevertible code depends on the
>>>>>> qdev conversion.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this true even for -M pc-0.15?
>>>>
>>>> Yes. Alias IDs enable modeling according to qdev (back then) for devices
>>>> that wrote oddly numbered states in the past and porting them over to
>>>> the new format. Adding some compat write-out mode would probably be
>>>> feasible but would also require some thoughts and quite a bit work to
>>>> integrate this cleanly in vmstate.
>>>>
>>>> I guess this just remained unnoticed because the introduction of the
>>>> alias ID concept and first conversions happened at a time when lots of
>>>> devices increased their vmstate version anyway.
>>>
>>> So, since we're approaching 1.1, we should really discuss release criteria for
>>> 1.1 with respect to live migration.  I'd prefer to avoid surprises in this release.
>>>
>>> My expectation is that migration works from:
>>>
>>> qemu-1.0 -M 1.0     =>     qemu-1.1 -M 1.1
>>> qemu-1.1 -M 1.0<=    qemu-1.1 -M 1.0
>>
>> Besides the instance ID thing, I found two further blockers:
>>
>>   - kvm-tpr-op (kvmvapic), easy to disable in non-1.1 machines
>>
>>   - vmstate fix for i8254 which involved a version bump from 2 to 3.
>>     That is actually now compatible with qemu-kvm and should not cause
>>     troubles there. But it breaks the backward-migration scenario for
>>     QEMU. I have no good idea how to resolve this while pleasing all
>>     consumers we care about. Any suggestions?
>
> Option 1: make -M old force an old vmstate to be written out.  Sounds
> like a generally useful thing.
> Option 2: ask those consumers to issue updates that bring their code up
> to version 3.  Require fully updated qemus on both sides.  Easy to
> achieve, result is less flexible but reasonable IMO (especially with a
> long lead time, which we have).

I prefer Option 2 presuming the bug is a legitimate bug fix.

If it couldn't be done as a subsection, then there's really no choice IMHO.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>

Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration between qemu-kvm 1.0 and 0.15

[Avi Kivity]

On 03/29/2012 05:21 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Option 1: make -M old force an old vmstate to be written out.  Sounds
>> like a generally useful thing.
>> Option 2: ask those consumers to issue updates that bring their code up
>> to version 3.  Require fully updated qemus on both sides.  Easy to
>> achieve, result is less flexible but reasonable IMO (especially with a
>> long lead time, which we have).
>
>
> I prefer Option 2 presuming the bug is a legitimate bug fix.
>
> If it couldn't be done as a subsection, then there's really no choice
> IMHO.

qemu-kvm already has version 3, so our hand is forced.  I too think
option 2 is the best here.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration between qemu-kvm 1.0 and 0.15

[Avi Kivity]

On 03/29/2012 05:21 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Option 1: make -M old force an old vmstate to be written out.  Sounds
>> like a generally useful thing.
>> Option 2: ask those consumers to issue updates that bring their code up
>> to version 3.  Require fully updated qemus on both sides.  Easy to
>> achieve, result is less flexible but reasonable IMO (especially with a
>> long lead time, which we have).
>
>
> I prefer Option 2 presuming the bug is a legitimate bug fix.
>
> If it couldn't be done as a subsection, then there's really no choice
> IMHO.

qemu-kvm already has version 3, so our hand is forced.  I too think
option 2 is the best here.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

Re: live migration between qemu-kvm 1.0 and 0.15

[Markus Armbruster]

Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> writes:

> So, since we're approaching 1.1, we should really discuss release
> criteria for 1.1 with respect to live migration.  I'd prefer to avoid
> surprises in this release.
>
> My expectation is that migration works from:
>
> qemu-1.0 -M 1.0     =>    qemu-1.1 -M 1.1
> qemu-1.1 -M 1.0     <=    qemu-1.1 -M 1.0
>
> I would expect that migration works from:
>
> qemu-0.15 -M 0.15   =>   qemu-1.1 -M 0.15
>
> I'm okay if this fails gracefully:
>
> qemu-1.1 -M 0.15    <=   qemu-0.15 -M 0.15

Until we have tools to mechanically verify migratability, such
expecations will remain just that: expectations :)

Vmstate describes the migration format (sort of), vmstate is data,
computers can process data, so at least some mechanical verification
should be possible, shouldn't it?  And even something that can only
disprove migratability, but not prove it, could be incredibly useful.

Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration between qemu-kvm 1.0 and 0.15

[Markus Armbruster]

Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> writes:

> So, since we're approaching 1.1, we should really discuss release
> criteria for 1.1 with respect to live migration.  I'd prefer to avoid
> surprises in this release.
>
> My expectation is that migration works from:
>
> qemu-1.0 -M 1.0     =>    qemu-1.1 -M 1.1
> qemu-1.1 -M 1.0     <=    qemu-1.1 -M 1.0
>
> I would expect that migration works from:
>
> qemu-0.15 -M 0.15   =>   qemu-1.1 -M 0.15
>
> I'm okay if this fails gracefully:
>
> qemu-1.1 -M 0.15    <=   qemu-0.15 -M 0.15

Until we have tools to mechanically verify migratability, such
expecations will remain just that: expectations :)

Vmstate describes the migration format (sort of), vmstate is data,
computers can process data, so at least some mechanical verification
should be possible, shouldn't it?  And even something that can only
disprove migratability, but not prove it, could be incredibly useful.