* [Xenomai-core] [PATCH 2.6] Add regression test for mprotect on pinned memory
@ 2012-04-02 14:32 Jan Kiszka
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jan Kiszka @ 2012-04-02 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xenomai-core
This tests both the original issue of mprotect reintroducing COW pages
to Xenomai processes as well as the recently fixed zero page corruption.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
---
src/testsuite/regression/native/Makefile.am | 2 +-
src/testsuite/regression/native/Makefile.in | 16 +++-
src/testsuite/regression/native/mprotect.c | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 142 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 src/testsuite/regression/native/mprotect.c
diff --git a/src/testsuite/regression/native/Makefile.am b/src/testsuite/regression/native/Makefile.am
index ce53834..afd2f43 100644
--- a/src/testsuite/regression/native/Makefile.am
+++ b/src/testsuite/regression/native/Makefile.am
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ tstdir = @XENO_TEST_DIR@/regression/native
noinst_HEADERS = check.h
-tst_PROGRAMS = leaks tsc heap sigdebug
+tst_PROGRAMS = leaks tsc heap sigdebug mprotect
CPPFLAGS = $(XENO_USER_CFLAGS) \
-I$(top_srcdir)/include
diff --git a/src/testsuite/regression/native/Makefile.in b/src/testsuite/regression/native/Makefile.in
index 3d5a0ce..b2ae93a 100644
--- a/src/testsuite/regression/native/Makefile.in
+++ b/src/testsuite/regression/native/Makefile.in
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ build_triplet = @build@
host_triplet = @host@
target_triplet = @target@
tst_PROGRAMS = leaks$(EXEEXT) tsc$(EXEEXT) heap$(EXEEXT) \
- sigdebug$(EXEEXT)
+ sigdebug$(EXEEXT) mprotect$(EXEEXT)
subdir = src/testsuite/regression/native
DIST_COMMON = $(noinst_HEADERS) $(srcdir)/Makefile.am \
$(srcdir)/Makefile.in
@@ -70,6 +70,12 @@ leaks_LDADD = $(LDADD)
leaks_DEPENDENCIES = ../../../skins/native/libnative.la \
../../../skins/rtdm/librtdm.la \
../../../skins/common/libxenomai.la
+mprotect_SOURCES = mprotect.c
+mprotect_OBJECTS = mprotect.$(OBJEXT)
+mprotect_LDADD = $(LDADD)
+mprotect_DEPENDENCIES = ../../../skins/native/libnative.la \
+ ../../../skins/rtdm/librtdm.la \
+ ../../../skins/common/libxenomai.la
sigdebug_SOURCES = sigdebug.c
sigdebug_OBJECTS = sigdebug.$(OBJEXT)
sigdebug_LDADD = $(LDADD)
@@ -95,8 +101,8 @@ CCLD = $(CC)
LINK = $(LIBTOOL) --tag=CC $(AM_LIBTOOLFLAGS) $(LIBTOOLFLAGS) \
--mode=link $(CCLD) $(AM_CFLAGS) $(CFLAGS) $(AM_LDFLAGS) \
$(LDFLAGS) -o $@
-SOURCES = heap.c leaks.c sigdebug.c tsc.c
-DIST_SOURCES = heap.c leaks.c sigdebug.c tsc.c
+SOURCES = heap.c leaks.c mprotect.c sigdebug.c tsc.c
+DIST_SOURCES = heap.c leaks.c mprotect.c sigdebug.c tsc.c
HEADERS = $(noinst_HEADERS)
ETAGS = etags
CTAGS = ctags
@@ -348,6 +354,9 @@ heap$(EXEEXT): $(heap_OBJECTS) $(heap_DEPENDENCIES)
leaks$(EXEEXT): $(leaks_OBJECTS) $(leaks_DEPENDENCIES)
@rm -f leaks$(EXEEXT)
$(LINK) $(leaks_OBJECTS) $(leaks_LDADD) $(LIBS)
+mprotect$(EXEEXT): $(mprotect_OBJECTS) $(mprotect_DEPENDENCIES)
+ @rm -f mprotect$(EXEEXT)
+ $(LINK) $(mprotect_OBJECTS) $(mprotect_LDADD) $(LIBS)
sigdebug$(EXEEXT): $(sigdebug_OBJECTS) $(sigdebug_DEPENDENCIES)
@rm -f sigdebug$(EXEEXT)
$(LINK) $(sigdebug_OBJECTS) $(sigdebug_LDADD) $(LIBS)
@@ -363,6 +372,7 @@ distclean-compile:
@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__include@ @am__quote@domain.hid@
@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__include@ @am__quote@domain.hid@
+@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__include@ @am__quote@domain.hid@
@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__include@ @am__quote@domain.hid@
@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__include@ @am__quote@domain.hid@
diff --git a/src/testsuite/regression/native/mprotect.c b/src/testsuite/regression/native/mprotect.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7d66e34
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/testsuite/regression/native/mprotect.c
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
+/*
+ * Test if implicit pinning of memory via mprotect works.
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
+ *
+ * Released under the terms of GPLv2.
+ */
+
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <signal.h>
+#include <sys/mman.h>
+#include <rtdk.h>
+#include <native/task.h>
+
+#define MEMSIZE 0x10000
+
+static void check_inner(const char *fn, int line, const char *msg,
+ int status, int expected)
+{
+ if (status == expected)
+ return;
+
+ rt_task_set_mode(T_WARNSW, 0, NULL);
+ rt_print_flush_buffers();
+ fprintf(stderr, "FAILURE %s:%d: %s returned %d instead of %d - %s\n",
+ fn, line, msg, status, expected, strerror(-status));
+ exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+}
+
+#define check_no_error(msg, status) ({ \
+ int __status = status; \
+ check_inner(__FUNCTION__, __LINE__, msg, \
+ __status < 0 ? __status : 0, 0); \
+ __status; \
+})
+
+static void check_value_inner(const char *fn, int line, const char *msg,
+ int value, int expected)
+{
+ if (value == expected)
+ return;
+
+ rt_task_set_mode(T_WARNSW, 0, NULL);
+ rt_print_flush_buffers();
+ fprintf(stderr,
+ "FAILURE %s:%d: %s returned %u instead of %u\n",
+ fn, line, msg, value, expected);
+ exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+}
+
+#define check_value(msg, value, expected) do { \
+ int __value = value; \
+ check_value_inner(__FUNCTION__, __LINE__, msg, __value, \
+ expected); \
+} while (0)
+
+void sigdebug_handler(int sig, siginfo_t *si, void *context)
+{
+ unsigned int reason = si->si_value.sival_int;
+
+ rt_print_flush_buffers();
+ fprintf(stderr, "FAILURE: sigdebug_handler triggered, reason %d\n",
+ reason);
+ exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char **argv)
+{
+ unsigned char *zero_mem, *test1_mem, *test2_mem;
+ RT_TASK main_task;
+ struct sigaction sa;
+ int err;
+
+ rt_print_auto_init(1);
+
+ errno = 0;
+ zero_mem = mmap(0, MEMSIZE, PROT_READ,
+ MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, 0, 0);
+ check_no_error("mmap", -errno);
+ test1_mem = mmap(0, MEMSIZE, PROT_READ,
+ MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, 0, 0);
+ check_no_error("mmap", -errno);
+
+ sigemptyset(&sa.sa_mask);
+ sa.sa_sigaction = sigdebug_handler;
+ sa.sa_flags = SA_SIGINFO;
+ sigaction(SIGDEBUG, &sa, NULL);
+
+ mlockall(MCL_CURRENT | MCL_FUTURE);
+
+ err = rt_task_shadow(&main_task, "main_task", 1, T_WARNSW);
+ check_no_error("rt_task_shadow", err);
+
+ rt_printf("memory read\n");
+ check_value("read mem", test1_mem[0], 0);
+
+ rt_task_set_mode(T_WARNSW, 0, NULL);
+ errno = 0;
+ test2_mem = mmap(0, MEMSIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
+ MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, 0, 0);
+ check_no_error("mmap", -errno);
+ mprotect(test2_mem, MEMSIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC);
+ check_no_error("mprotect", -errno);
+
+ rt_task_sleep(0);
+ rt_task_set_mode(0, T_WARNSW, NULL);
+
+ rt_printf("memory write after exec enable\n");
+ test2_mem[0] = 0xff;
+
+ rt_task_set_mode(T_WARNSW, 0, NULL);
+ err = mprotect(test1_mem, MEMSIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE);
+ check_no_error("mprotect", err);
+
+ rt_task_sleep(0);
+ rt_task_set_mode(0, T_WARNSW, NULL);
+
+ rt_printf("memory write after write enable\n");
+ test1_mem[0] = 0xff;
+ check_value("read zero", zero_mem[0], 0);
+
+ rt_task_set_mode(T_WARNSW, 0, NULL);
+ rt_print_flush_buffers();
+ fprintf(stderr, "Test OK\n");
+
+ return 0;
+}
--
1.7.3.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2012-04-02 14:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-04-02 14:32 [Xenomai-core] [PATCH 2.6] Add regression test for mprotect on pinned memory Jan Kiszka
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.