All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>
To: daobang wang <wangdb1981@gmail.com>
Cc: "Marcus Sorensen" <shadowsor@gmail.com>,
	"Mathias Burén" <mathias.buren@gmail.com>,
	linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
	"xfs@oss.sgi.com" <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: RAID5 created by 8 disks works with xfs
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 16:01:54 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F7E0842.6090004@hardwarefreak.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACwgYDOtCoVF-p+KKqPYxHhA4vWF78Ueecx9hcVWLoyxFWzV9Q@mail.gmail.com>

On 4/5/2012 1:48 AM, daobang wang wrote:
> Hi stan,
> 
>      I duplicated the input/output error issue, about the detail
> operations and logs, please see the attachments, Is there any way to
> fix this? thanks!
> 
> Best Regards,
> Daobang Wang.


These fiilesystem issues have nothing to do with linux-raid.  I'm
copying the XFS mailing list which is where this discussion should be
taking place from this point forward.  Please reply-to-all, and paste
the output you previously attached, but inline this time.

Also, since the XFS folks are unfamiliar with what you're doing up to
this point, please provide a basic description of your hardware/storage
setup, kernel version, mdraid configuration, xfs_info output as well as
your fstab XFS mount options, and a description of your workload.

My best guess at this point as to the du and ls errors is that your
application is not behaving properly, or you're still running with XFS
barriers disabled, which, I say _loudly_ for the 2nd time, you should
NOT do in the absence of BBWC, which you stated you do not have.

-- 
Stan

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>
To: daobang wang <wangdb1981@gmail.com>
Cc: "Marcus Sorensen" <shadowsor@gmail.com>,
	linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
	n <mathias.buren@gmail.com>,
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mathias_Bur=E9?=@oss.sgi.com,
	"xfs@oss.sgi.com" <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: RAID5 created by 8 disks works with xfs
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 16:01:54 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F7E0842.6090004@hardwarefreak.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACwgYDOtCoVF-p+KKqPYxHhA4vWF78Ueecx9hcVWLoyxFWzV9Q@mail.gmail.com>

On 4/5/2012 1:48 AM, daobang wang wrote:
> Hi stan,
> 
>      I duplicated the input/output error issue, about the detail
> operations and logs, please see the attachments, Is there any way to
> fix this? thanks!
> 
> Best Regards,
> Daobang Wang.


These fiilesystem issues have nothing to do with linux-raid.  I'm
copying the XFS mailing list which is where this discussion should be
taking place from this point forward.  Please reply-to-all, and paste
the output you previously attached, but inline this time.

Also, since the XFS folks are unfamiliar with what you're doing up to
this point, please provide a basic description of your hardware/storage
setup, kernel version, mdraid configuration, xfs_info output as well as
your fstab XFS mount options, and a description of your workload.

My best guess at this point as to the du and ls errors is that your
application is not behaving properly, or you're still running with XFS
barriers disabled, which, I say _loudly_ for the 2nd time, you should
NOT do in the absence of BBWC, which you stated you do not have.

-- 
Stan

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-04-05 21:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-31  1:22 RAID5 created by 8 disks works with xfs daobang wang
2012-03-31  7:59 ` Mathias Burén
2012-03-31 20:09   ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-01  1:16     ` daobang wang
2012-04-01  2:05       ` daobang wang
2012-04-01  5:13         ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-01  3:51       ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-01  5:12         ` daobang wang
2012-04-01  5:40           ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-01  5:59             ` daobang wang
2012-04-01  6:20               ` daobang wang
2012-04-01  7:08                 ` Marcus Sorensen
2012-04-02  3:47                   ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-05  0:48                     ` daobang wang
     [not found]                       ` <CACwgYDOtCoVF-p+KKqPYxHhA4vWF78Ueecx9hcVWLoyxFWzV9Q@mail.gmail.com>
2012-04-05 21:01                         ` Stan Hoeppner [this message]
2012-04-05 21:01                           ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-06  0:25                           ` daobang wang
2012-04-06  0:25                             ` daobang wang
2012-04-06  2:33                             ` daobang wang
2012-04-06  2:33                               ` daobang wang
2012-04-06  6:00                               ` Jack Wang
2012-04-06  6:00                                 ` Jack Wang
2012-04-06  6:45                                 ` daobang wang
2012-04-06  6:45                                   ` daobang wang
2012-04-06  6:49                                   ` daobang wang
2012-04-06  6:49                                     ` daobang wang
2012-04-06  8:18                                     ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-06  8:18                                       ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-06  8:45                                       ` daobang wang
2012-04-06  8:45                                         ` daobang wang
2012-04-06 11:12                                         ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-06 11:12                                           ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-18  2:23                                           ` daobang wang
2012-04-18  2:23                                             ` daobang wang
2012-04-02  3:12                 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-01 10:33             ` David Brown
2012-04-01 12:28               ` John Robinson
2012-04-02  6:59                 ` David Brown
     [not found]                 ` <CA+res+QkLi7sxZrD-XOcbR47CeJ5gADf7P6pa1w1oMf8CKSB4g@mail.gmail.com>
2012-04-02  8:01                   ` John Robinson
2012-04-02 10:01                     ` Jack Wang
2012-04-02 10:28                       ` John Robinson
2012-04-02 20:41                         ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-02  5:43               ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-02  7:04                 ` David Brown
2012-04-02 20:21                   ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-01  4:52       ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-04-01  8:06         ` John Robinson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F7E0842.6090004@hardwarefreak.com \
    --to=stan@hardwarefreak.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.buren@gmail.com \
    --cc=shadowsor@gmail.com \
    --cc=wangdb1981@gmail.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.