From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: deprecating/removing the legacy mode of devpts
Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 15:26:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F8210A5.7000900@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120408231841.42e28867@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk>
On 04/08/2012 03:18 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> Ok I'm putting my tty maintainers hat on at this point because nobody
> seems to be listening
>
> I'm NAKking this change, I'm NAKking the feature-removal change.
>
> If you want this to change convince the distributions there is a point in
> supporting it. This is the *wrong* forum to force a cornercase feature
> onto a bazillion users, and the wrong way to strongarm maintainers of the
> relevant user space.
>
> If udev has a problem handling it nicely because of the way the link is
> generated then *fix that problem* so udev automatically gets both cases
> right. If need be we can add more messages to udev to tell it what is
> expected and what devtmpfs should produce.
>
What if it turns out we can make udev/devtmpfs make this happen
transparently (which it sounds like it might be possible)? Would you be
okay with removing the "implicit bind mount" property of the current
devpts then?
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-08 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-07 18:36 RFC: deprecating/removing the legacy mode of devpts H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-07 19:20 ` Alan Cox
2012-04-07 20:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-07 21:27 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-04-07 22:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-08 7:30 ` Kay Sievers
2012-04-08 18:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-08 19:16 ` Kay Sievers
2012-04-11 23:53 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-04-11 23:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-12 0:30 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-04-12 0:38 ` Kay Sievers
2012-04-12 1:14 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-04-12 1:08 ` Al Viro
2012-04-12 1:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-12 2:26 ` Al Viro
2012-04-12 2:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-12 3:04 ` Al Viro
2012-04-12 3:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-12 2:27 ` Kay Sievers
2012-04-12 2:45 ` Al Viro
2012-04-12 2:48 ` Kay Sievers
2012-04-12 2:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-12 3:02 ` Kay Sievers
2012-04-08 17:20 ` Alan Cox
2012-04-07 20:04 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-08 18:15 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-04-08 22:18 ` Alan Cox
2012-04-08 22:26 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2012-04-08 22:46 ` Alan Cox
2012-04-08 22:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-09 3:15 ` Theodore Tso
2012-04-09 12:43 ` Kay Sievers
2012-04-09 13:37 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F8210A5.7000900@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=khlebnikov@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.