From: Shubhrajyoti <shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul-DWxLp4Yu+b8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org,
Benoit Cousson <b-cousson-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 19/19] ARM: OMAP4: hwmod data: I2C: add flag for context restore
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:10:32 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F851950.6060503@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1204101212530.20894-rwI8Ez+7Ko+d5PgPZx9QOdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
On Tuesday 10 April 2012 11:43 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2012, Shubhrajyoti D wrote:
>
>> Restore of context is not done for OMAP4. This patch
>> adds the OMAP_I2C_FLAG_RESET_REGS_POSTIDLE in the OMAP4
>> hwmod data which activates the restore for OMAP4.
>> Currently the OMAP4 does not hit device off still the
>> driver may have support for it.
>>
>> Cc: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
>> Cc: Paul Wamsley <paul-DWxLp4Yu+b8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
> Thanks, queued for 3.5. You can drop this from your series; it will
> likely cause merge conflicts if you don't.
Thanks Paul.
Will drop this patch and resend.
> - Paul
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: shubhrajyoti@ti.com (Shubhrajyoti)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv6 19/19] ARM: OMAP4: hwmod data: I2C: add flag for context restore
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:10:32 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F851950.6060503@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1204101212530.20894@utopia.booyaka.com>
On Tuesday 10 April 2012 11:43 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2012, Shubhrajyoti D wrote:
>
>> Restore of context is not done for OMAP4. This patch
>> adds the OMAP_I2C_FLAG_RESET_REGS_POSTIDLE in the OMAP4
>> hwmod data which activates the restore for OMAP4.
>> Currently the OMAP4 does not hit device off still the
>> driver may have support for it.
>>
>> Cc: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
>> Cc: Paul Wamsley <paul@pwsan.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@ti.com>
> Thanks, queued for 3.5. You can drop this from your series; it will
> likely cause merge conflicts if you don't.
Thanks Paul.
Will drop this patch and resend.
> - Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-11 5:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-10 10:56 [PATCH 00/19] I2C updates Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 10:56 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 10:56 ` [PATCHv6 02/19] I2C: OMAP: Remove reset at init Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 10:56 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 10:56 ` [PATCHv6 03/19] I2C: OMAP: Recover from Bus Busy condition Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 10:56 ` Shubhrajyoti D
[not found] ` <1334055397-899-1-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-10 10:56 ` [PATCHv6 01/19] I2C: OMAP: make omap_i2c_unidle/idle functions depend on CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 10:56 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 10:56 ` [PATCHv6 04/19] I2C: OMAP: I2C register restore only if context is lost Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 10:56 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 10:56 ` [PATCHv6 07/19] I2C: OMAP: Optimise the remove code Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 10:56 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 10:56 ` [PATCHv6 08/19] I2C: OMAP: Fix the error handling Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 10:56 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 10:56 ` [PATCHv6 11/19] I2C: OMAP: use devm_* functions Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 10:56 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 10:56 ` [PATCHv6 14/19] I2C: OMAP: Use SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 10:56 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 10:56 ` [PATCHv6 15/19] I2C: OMAP: make the read ready processing a separate function Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 10:56 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 10:56 ` [PATCHv6 16/19] I2C: OMAP: fix missing handling of errata I2C_OMAP3_1P153 Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 10:56 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 10:56 ` [PATCHv6 19/19] ARM: OMAP4: hwmod data: I2C: add flag for context restore Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 10:56 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 18:13 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-04-10 18:13 ` Paul Walmsley
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.1204101212530.20894-rwI8Ez+7Ko+d5PgPZx9QOdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-11 5:40 ` Shubhrajyoti [this message]
2012-04-11 5:40 ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-04-10 11:31 ` [PATCH 00/19] I2C updates S, Venkatraman
2012-04-10 11:31 ` S, Venkatraman
2012-04-10 11:41 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-04-10 11:41 ` Felipe Balbi
[not found] ` <20120410114153.GR20616-S8G//mZuvNWo5Im9Ml3/Zg@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-10 14:56 ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-04-10 14:56 ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-04-10 10:56 ` [PATCHv6 05/19] I2C: OMAP: Fix the interrupt clearing in OMAP4 Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 10:56 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 10:56 ` [PATCHv6 06/19] I2C: OMAP: Fix the mismatch of pm_runtime enable and disable Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 10:56 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 10:56 ` [PATCHv6 09/19] I2C: OMAP: Correct I2C revision for OMAP3 Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 10:56 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 10:56 ` [PATCHv6 10/19] I2C: OMAP: Don't check if wait_for_completion_timeout() returns less than zero Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 10:56 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 10:56 ` [PATCHv6 12/19] I2C: OMAP: Fix the crash in i2c remove Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 10:56 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 10:56 ` [PATCHv6 13/19] I2C: OMAP: Handle error check for pm runtime Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 10:56 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 10:56 ` [PATCHv6 17/19] I2C: OMAP: Do not set the XUDF if the underflow is not reached Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 10:56 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 10:56 ` [PATCHv6 18/19] I2C: OMAP: Rename the 1p153 to the erratum id i462 Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-10 10:56 ` Shubhrajyoti D
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F851950.6060503@ti.com \
--to=shubhrajyoti-l0cymroini0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=b-cousson-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=paul-DWxLp4Yu+b8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.