All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Sheng Yang <sheng@yasker.org>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Tim (Xen.org)" <tim@xen.org>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: always set the sched clock as unstable
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:39:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F8872D7.7050507@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+2rt41ctpU-vhR7=u_r45=o8djpq0-5YE5jcj_4FR2bWYu5pQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 13/04/12 19:31, Sheng Yang wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:20 AM, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com
> <mailto:david.vrabel@citrix.com>> wrote:
> 
>     From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com
>     <mailto:david.vrabel@citrix.com>>
> 
>     The sched clock was considered stable based on the capabilities of the
>     underlying hardware.  This does not make sense for Xen PV guests as:
>     a) the hardware TSC is not used directly as the clock source; and b)
>     guests may migrate to hosts with different hardware capabilities.
> 
>     It is not clear to me whether the Xen clock source is supposed to be
>     stable and whether it should be stable across migration.  For a clock
>     source to be stable it must be: a) monotonic; c) synchronized across
>     CPUs; and c) constant rate.
> 
>     There have also been reports of systems with apparently unstable
>     clocks where clearing sched_clock_stable has fixed problems with
>     migrated VMs hanging.
> 
>     So, always set the sched clock as unstable when using the Xen clock
>     source.
> 
>     Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com
>     <mailto:david.vrabel@citrix.com>>
>     ---
>      arch/x86/xen/time.c |    1 +
>      1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
>     diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/time.c b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
>     index 0296a95..8469b5a 100644
>     --- a/arch/x86/xen/time.c
>     +++ b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
>     @@ -473,6 +473,7 @@ static void __init xen_time_init(void)
>            do_settimeofday(&tp);
> 
>            setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_TSC);
>     +       sched_clock_stable = 0;
> 
>            xen_setup_runstate_info(cpu);
>            xen_setup_timer(cpu);
>     --
>     1.7.2.5
> 
> 
> I really prefer to hide nonstop tsc feature from Xen side, rather than
> let Linux kernel to have a condition that "Nonstop TSC feature existed,
> but sched_clock_stable=0".

I disagree.  The decision on whether the clock is stable or not should
be in the Xen clock source code.

David

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-13 18:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-13 18:20 [PATCH] xen: always set the sched clock as unstable David Vrabel
2012-04-13 18:20 ` David Vrabel
2012-04-13 18:31 ` Sheng Yang
2012-04-13 18:39   ` David Vrabel [this message]
2012-04-13 18:33 ` Sheng Yang
2012-04-16 11:32 ` Jan Beulich
2012-04-16 11:32 ` Jan Beulich
2012-04-16 14:59   ` David Vrabel
2012-04-16 15:16     ` Tim Deegan
2012-04-16 15:16       ` Tim Deegan
2012-04-16 15:17     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-04-16 15:17       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-04-16 16:20       ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-16 16:20       ` [Xen-devel] " Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-16 16:05     ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-16 16:14       ` Jan Beulich
2012-04-16 16:14       ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2012-04-16 17:22         ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-17  7:27           ` Jan Beulich
2012-04-17 15:36             ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-17 15:36             ` [Xen-devel] " Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-17  7:27           ` Jan Beulich
2012-04-16 17:22         ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-16 16:26       ` David Vrabel
2012-04-16 16:26       ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2012-04-16 17:30         ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-16 17:30         ` [Xen-devel] " Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-17  7:47           ` Jan Beulich
2012-04-17 15:42             ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-17 15:42             ` [Xen-devel] " Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-17  7:47           ` Jan Beulich
2012-04-16 17:08       ` [Xen-devel] " Tim Deegan
2012-04-16 17:52         ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-16 18:17           ` Tim Deegan
2012-04-16 18:17           ` [Xen-devel] " Tim Deegan
2012-04-16 23:01             ` Sheng Yang
2012-04-17  0:29               ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-17  0:29               ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-17  8:19               ` [Xen-devel] " Tim Deegan
2012-04-17  8:19               ` Tim Deegan
2012-04-16 23:01             ` Sheng Yang
2012-04-16 17:52         ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-16 17:08       ` Tim Deegan
2012-04-16 16:05     ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-16 14:59   ` David Vrabel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F8872D7.7050507@citrix.com \
    --to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sheng@yasker.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.