From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Tim (Xen.org)" <tim@xen.org>, Sheng Yang <sheng@yasker.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: always set the sched clock as unstable
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:59:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F8C33E0.2080007@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F8C1F6D020000780007E11A@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On 16/04/12 12:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 13.04.12 at 20:20, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com> wrote:
>> From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
>>
>> The sched clock was considered stable based on the capabilities of the
>> underlying hardware. This does not make sense for Xen PV guests as:
>> a) the hardware TSC is not used directly as the clock source; and b)
>> guests may migrate to hosts with different hardware capabilities.
>>
>> It is not clear to me whether the Xen clock source is supposed to be
>> stable and whether it should be stable across migration. For a clock
>> source to be stable it must be: a) monotonic; c) synchronized across
>> CPUs; and c) constant rate.
Tim, Thomas, can you comment on the above paragraph? Is it correct?
>> There have also been reports of systems with apparently unstable
>> clocks where clearing sched_clock_stable has fixed problems with
>> migrated VMs hanging.
>>
>> So, always set the sched clock as unstable when using the Xen clock
>> source.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/xen/time.c | 1 +
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/time.c b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
>> index 0296a95..8469b5a 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/xen/time.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
>> @@ -473,6 +473,7 @@ static void __init xen_time_init(void)
>> do_settimeofday(&tp);
>>
>> setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_TSC);
>> + sched_clock_stable = 0;
>
> This, unfortunately, is not sufficient afaict: If a CPU gets brought up
> post-boot, the variable may need to be cleared again. Instead you
> ought to call mark_tsc_unstable().
Yeah, mark_tsc_unstable() is the right thing to do.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-16 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-13 18:20 [PATCH] xen: always set the sched clock as unstable David Vrabel
2012-04-13 18:20 ` David Vrabel
2012-04-13 18:31 ` Sheng Yang
2012-04-13 18:39 ` David Vrabel
2012-04-13 18:33 ` Sheng Yang
2012-04-16 11:32 ` Jan Beulich
2012-04-16 14:59 ` David Vrabel
2012-04-16 14:59 ` David Vrabel [this message]
2012-04-16 15:16 ` Tim Deegan
2012-04-16 15:16 ` Tim Deegan
2012-04-16 15:17 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-04-16 15:17 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-04-16 16:20 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-16 16:20 ` [Xen-devel] " Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-16 16:05 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-16 16:05 ` [Xen-devel] " Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-16 16:14 ` Jan Beulich
2012-04-16 16:14 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2012-04-16 17:22 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-17 7:27 ` Jan Beulich
2012-04-17 15:36 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-17 15:36 ` [Xen-devel] " Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-17 7:27 ` Jan Beulich
2012-04-16 17:22 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-16 16:26 ` David Vrabel
2012-04-16 16:26 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2012-04-16 17:30 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-16 17:30 ` [Xen-devel] " Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-17 7:47 ` Jan Beulich
2012-04-17 15:42 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-17 15:42 ` [Xen-devel] " Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-17 7:47 ` Jan Beulich
2012-04-16 17:08 ` Tim Deegan
2012-04-16 17:08 ` [Xen-devel] " Tim Deegan
2012-04-16 17:52 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-16 18:17 ` Tim Deegan
2012-04-16 18:17 ` [Xen-devel] " Tim Deegan
2012-04-16 23:01 ` Sheng Yang
2012-04-17 0:29 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-17 0:29 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-17 8:19 ` [Xen-devel] " Tim Deegan
2012-04-17 8:19 ` Tim Deegan
2012-04-16 23:01 ` Sheng Yang
2012-04-16 17:52 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-16 11:32 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F8C33E0.2080007@citrix.com \
--to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sheng@yasker.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.