All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bob Cochran <yocto@mindchasers.com>
To: Dongxiao Xu <dongxiao.xu@intel.com>
Cc: poky@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] meta-yocto: Move OELAYOUT_ABI definition to poky.conf
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:26:19 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F8C482B.7020808@mindchasers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4fed98c4af3f78a7c76e92a57f714f4d93b3dd1f.1334562500.git.dongxiao.xu@intel.com>

On 04/16/2012 03:52 AM, Dongxiao Xu wrote:
> The ABI version definition should go along with the DISTRO variable
> since it impact the TMPDIR definition.
>
> Otherwise, if a user used to work with pure OE-Core, and then he/she
> added meta-yocto layer, it will report ABI version incompatibility
> issue. This is because ABI is changed to "8" by adding meta-yocto layer,
> however the DISTRO variable is not defined and TMPDIR is still
> "tmp-eglibc".

I'm having trouble understanding what was accomplished with these 
changes and the motivation for them.  Didn't poky do it's job of 
complaining when the user first built without the meta-yocto layer and 
then added it back in, which caused OELAYOUT_ABI to change?

Before and after the change, OELAYOUT_ABI="8" was defined in 
meta-yocto/conf.  The setting of the variable was only moved between 
files in this layer (abi_version.conf to poky.conf).    Regardless, 
neither of these files are going to be found by the "include" inside 
bitbake.conf once meta-yocto is removed from BBPATH.

When OELAYOUT_ABI was previously set in abi_version.conf, poky depended 
on meta-yocto being in front of meta in BBPATH for the variable to be 
picked up correctly, so it seems that moving the variable to poky.conf 
and reordering the includes / requires in bitbake.conf removes the path 
dependency, but I don't see this motivation anywhere in the commit 
comments.

I'm certainly not a seasoned poky user, but it seems to me that this 
change isn't explained well.


>
> Defining the OELAYOUT_ABI variable in poky.conf could fix this issue.
>
> This fixes [YOCTO #2303]


Going into the bug description, it is stated in item #5 that the 
meta-yocto layer was added back in, but it doesn't state whether DISTRO 
was set again in local.conf to poky.  I'm thinking that was part of the 
test procedure, but left out?

Any clarifications would be greatly appreciated.  Thanks!



>
> Signed-off-by: Dongxiao Xu<dongxiao.xu@intel.com>
> ---
>   meta-yocto/conf/abi_version.conf |    7 -------
>   meta-yocto/conf/distro/poky.conf |    7 +++++++
>   2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>   delete mode 100644 meta-yocto/conf/abi_version.conf
>
> diff --git a/meta-yocto/conf/abi_version.conf b/meta-yocto/conf/abi_version.conf
> deleted file mode 100644
> index 83b668a..0000000
> --- a/meta-yocto/conf/abi_version.conf
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1,7 +0,0 @@
> -#
> -# OELAYOUT_ABI allows us to notify users when the format of TMPDIR changes in
> -# an incompatible way. Such changes should usually be detailed in the commit
> -# that breaks the format and have been previously discussed on the mailing list
> -# with general agreement from the core team.
> -#
> -OELAYOUT_ABI = "8"
> diff --git a/meta-yocto/conf/distro/poky.conf b/meta-yocto/conf/distro/poky.conf
> index e4d7c1d..e51ccdf 100644
> --- a/meta-yocto/conf/distro/poky.conf
> +++ b/meta-yocto/conf/distro/poky.conf
> @@ -67,3 +67,10 @@ CONNECTIVITY_CHECK_URIS ?= "git://git.yoctoproject.org/yocto-firewall-test;proto
>
>   # Default hash policy for distro
>   BB_SIGNATURE_HANDLER ?= 'OEBasicHash'
> +#
> +# OELAYOUT_ABI allows us to notify users when the format of TMPDIR changes in
> +# an incompatible way. Such changes should usually be detailed in the commit
> +# that breaks the format and have been previously discussed on the mailing list
> +# with general agreement from the core team.
> +#
> +OELAYOUT_ABI = "8"



  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-16 16:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-16  7:52 [PATCH 0/1][PULL] meta-yocto: Move OELAYOUT_ABI definition to poky.conf Dongxiao Xu
2012-04-16  7:52 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Dongxiao Xu
2012-04-16 16:26   ` Bob Cochran [this message]
2012-04-16 16:46     ` Richard Purdie
2012-04-16 15:16 ` [PATCH 0/1][PULL] " Saul Wold

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F8C482B.7020808@mindchasers.com \
    --to=yocto@mindchasers.com \
    --cc=dongxiao.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=poky@yoctoproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.