From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
To: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
balajitk@ti.com, cjb@laptop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: omap_hsmmc: Fix check for mmc dt node
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:41:51 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F8D41E7.2050701@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334656449-12142-1-git-send-email-jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>
On Tuesday 17 April 2012 03:24 PM, Jassi Brar wrote:
> Proper check should be if the hsmmc driver got its platform_data
> via devicetree, and not if the devicetree is populated for the
> platform.
This one is already fixed here..
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg67879.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Jassi Brar<jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>
> ---
>
> The patch is more than a nit-pick because upstream doesn't yet have dt
> nodes for mmc on OMAP while the driver wrongly assumes it does.
> Which isn't a problem until you use some low-end sdhc card
> (Transcend 8GB Class-4 in my experience) which fails to re-initialize,
> OCR[30] set, if the first attempt fails due to delay at certain times
> during the probe (for ex, simply enable CONFIG_REGULATOR_DUMMY).
> Apparently such cards need proper 0v->1.8v power cycle to recover
> (another Class-10 card does recover after ~10 attempts by the host).
>
> While this simple patch gets us through the problem, it also tells
> that adding mmc dt nodes without PBIAS setup callbacks in place
> (without which we can't switch off the regulator or do 1.8v -> 3.3v
> switch) is probably not a safe option.
>
> drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
> index c628b95..b5ca4593 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
> @@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ struct omap_hsmmc_next {
>
> struct omap_hsmmc_host {
> struct device *dev;
> + struct of_device_id *of_dev;
> struct mmc_host *mmc;
> struct mmc_request *mrq;
> struct mmc_command *cmd;
> @@ -249,7 +250,7 @@ static int omap_hsmmc_set_power(struct device *dev, int slot, int power_on,
> * the pbias cell programming support is still missing when
> * booting with Device tree
> */
> - if (of_have_populated_dt()&& !vdd)
> + if (host->of_dev&& !vdd)
> return 0;
>
> if (mmc_slot(host).before_set_reg)
> @@ -1550,7 +1551,7 @@ static void omap_hsmmc_set_ios(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios)
> * can't be allowed when booting with device
> * tree.
> */
> - (!of_have_populated_dt())) {
> + !host->of_dev) {
> /*
> * The mmc_select_voltage fn of the core does
> * not seem to set the power_mode to
> @@ -1837,6 +1838,7 @@ static int __devinit omap_hsmmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> host = mmc_priv(mmc);
> host->mmc = mmc;
> host->pdata = pdata;
> + host->of_dev = match;
> host->dev =&pdev->dev;
> host->use_dma = 1;
> host->dev->dma_mask =&pdata->dma_mask;
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: rnayak@ti.com (Rajendra Nayak)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] mmc: omap_hsmmc: Fix check for mmc dt node
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:41:51 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F8D41E7.2050701@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334656449-12142-1-git-send-email-jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>
On Tuesday 17 April 2012 03:24 PM, Jassi Brar wrote:
> Proper check should be if the hsmmc driver got its platform_data
> via devicetree, and not if the devicetree is populated for the
> platform.
This one is already fixed here..
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg67879.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Jassi Brar<jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>
> ---
>
> The patch is more than a nit-pick because upstream doesn't yet have dt
> nodes for mmc on OMAP while the driver wrongly assumes it does.
> Which isn't a problem until you use some low-end sdhc card
> (Transcend 8GB Class-4 in my experience) which fails to re-initialize,
> OCR[30] set, if the first attempt fails due to delay at certain times
> during the probe (for ex, simply enable CONFIG_REGULATOR_DUMMY).
> Apparently such cards need proper 0v->1.8v power cycle to recover
> (another Class-10 card does recover after ~10 attempts by the host).
>
> While this simple patch gets us through the problem, it also tells
> that adding mmc dt nodes without PBIAS setup callbacks in place
> (without which we can't switch off the regulator or do 1.8v -> 3.3v
> switch) is probably not a safe option.
>
> drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
> index c628b95..b5ca4593 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
> @@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ struct omap_hsmmc_next {
>
> struct omap_hsmmc_host {
> struct device *dev;
> + struct of_device_id *of_dev;
> struct mmc_host *mmc;
> struct mmc_request *mrq;
> struct mmc_command *cmd;
> @@ -249,7 +250,7 @@ static int omap_hsmmc_set_power(struct device *dev, int slot, int power_on,
> * the pbias cell programming support is still missing when
> * booting with Device tree
> */
> - if (of_have_populated_dt()&& !vdd)
> + if (host->of_dev&& !vdd)
> return 0;
>
> if (mmc_slot(host).before_set_reg)
> @@ -1550,7 +1551,7 @@ static void omap_hsmmc_set_ios(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios)
> * can't be allowed when booting with device
> * tree.
> */
> - (!of_have_populated_dt())) {
> + !host->of_dev) {
> /*
> * The mmc_select_voltage fn of the core does
> * not seem to set the power_mode to
> @@ -1837,6 +1838,7 @@ static int __devinit omap_hsmmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> host = mmc_priv(mmc);
> host->mmc = mmc;
> host->pdata = pdata;
> + host->of_dev = match;
> host->dev =&pdev->dev;
> host->use_dma = 1;
> host->dev->dma_mask =&pdata->dma_mask;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-17 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-17 9:54 [PATCH] mmc: omap_hsmmc: Fix check for mmc dt node Jassi Brar
2012-04-17 9:54 ` Jassi Brar
2012-04-17 10:11 ` T Krishnamoorthy, Balaji
2012-04-17 10:11 ` T Krishnamoorthy, Balaji
2012-04-17 10:25 ` Jassi Brar
2012-04-17 10:25 ` Jassi Brar
2012-04-17 10:11 ` Rajendra Nayak [this message]
2012-04-17 10:11 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-04-17 10:35 ` Jassi Brar
2012-04-17 10:35 ` Jassi Brar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F8D41E7.2050701@ti.com \
--to=rnayak@ti.com \
--cc=balajitk@ti.com \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=jaswinder.singh@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.