From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 5/9] KVM: MMU: introduce SPTE_WRITE_PROTECT bit
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 16:19:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F911C05.2070701@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F911B74.4040305@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
If this bit is set, it means the W bit of the spte is cleared due
to shadow page table protection
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index dd984b6..eb02fc4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ module_param(dbg, bool, 0644);
#define SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE (1ULL << PT_FIRST_AVAIL_BITS_SHIFT)
#define SPTE_ALLOW_WRITE (1ULL << (PT_FIRST_AVAIL_BITS_SHIFT + 1))
+#define SPTE_WRITE_PROTECT (1ULL << (PT_FIRST_AVAIL_BITS_SHIFT + 2))
#define SHADOW_PT_INDEX(addr, level) PT64_INDEX(addr, level)
@@ -1042,36 +1043,51 @@ static void drop_spte(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep)
rmap_remove(kvm, sptep);
}
+static bool spte_wp_by_dirty_log(u64 spte)
+{
+ WARN_ON(is_writable_pte(spte));
+
+ return (spte & SPTE_ALLOW_WRITE) && !(spte & SPTE_WRITE_PROTECT);
+}
+
/* Return true if the spte is dropped. */
static bool spte_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep, bool large,
- bool *flush)
+ bool *flush, bool page_table_protect)
{
u64 spte = *sptep;
- if (!is_writable_pte(spte))
- return false;
+ if (is_writable_pte(spte)) {
+ *flush |= true;
- *flush |= true;
+ if (large) {
+ pgprintk("rmap_write_protect(large): spte %p %llx\n",
+ spte, *spte);
+ BUG_ON(!is_large_pte(spte));
- if (large) {
- pgprintk("rmap_write_protect(large): spte %p %llx\n",
- spte, *spte);
- BUG_ON(!is_large_pte(spte));
+ drop_spte(kvm, sptep);
+ --kvm->stat.lpages;
+ return true;
+ }
- drop_spte(kvm, sptep);
- --kvm->stat.lpages;
- return true;
+ goto reset_spte;
}
+ if (page_table_protect && spte_wp_by_dirty_log(spte))
+ goto reset_spte;
+
+ return false;
+
+reset_spte:
rmap_printk("rmap_write_protect: spte %p %llx\n", spte, *spte);
spte = spte & ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK;
+ if (page_table_protect)
+ spte |= SPTE_WRITE_PROTECT;
mmu_spte_update(sptep, spte);
-
return false;
}
-static bool
-__rmap_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp, int level)
+static bool __rmap_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp,
+ int level, bool page_table_protect)
{
u64 *sptep;
struct rmap_iterator iter;
@@ -1080,7 +1096,7 @@ __rmap_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp, int level)
for (sptep = rmap_get_first(*rmapp, &iter); sptep;) {
BUG_ON(!(*sptep & PT_PRESENT_MASK));
if (spte_write_protect(kvm, sptep, level > PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL,
- &write_protected)) {
+ &write_protected, page_table_protect)) {
sptep = rmap_get_first(*rmapp, &iter);
continue;
}
@@ -1109,7 +1125,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_write_protect_pt_masked(struct kvm *kvm,
while (mask) {
rmapp = &slot->rmap[gfn_offset + __ffs(mask)];
- __rmap_write_protect(kvm, rmapp, PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL);
+ __rmap_write_protect(kvm, rmapp, PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL, false);
/* clear the first set bit */
mask &= mask - 1;
@@ -1128,7 +1144,7 @@ static bool rmap_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm, u64 gfn)
for (i = PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL;
i < PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL + KVM_NR_PAGE_SIZES; ++i) {
rmapp = __gfn_to_rmap(gfn, i, slot);
- write_protected |= __rmap_write_protect(kvm, rmapp, i);
+ write_protected |= __rmap_write_protect(kvm, rmapp, i, true);
}
return write_protected;
@@ -1179,7 +1195,8 @@ static int kvm_set_pte_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp,
new_spte |= (u64)new_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
new_spte &= ~(PT_WRITABLE_MASK | SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE |
- shadow_accessed_mask | SPTE_ALLOW_WRITE);
+ shadow_accessed_mask | SPTE_ALLOW_WRITE |
+ SPTE_WRITE_PROTECT);
mmu_spte_clear_track_bits(sptep);
mmu_spte_set(sptep, new_spte);
@@ -2346,6 +2363,7 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
ret = 1;
pte_access &= ~ACC_WRITE_MASK;
spte &= ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK;
+ spte |= SPTE_WRITE_PROTECT;
}
}
@@ -3934,7 +3952,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_slot_remove_write_access(struct kvm *kvm, int slot)
continue;
spte_write_protect(kvm, &pt[i],
- is_large_pte(pt[i]), &flush);
+ is_large_pte(pt[i]), &flush, false);
}
}
kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
--
1.7.7.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-20 8:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-20 8:16 [PATCH v3 0/9] KVM: MMU: fast page fault Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-20 8:17 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] KVM: MMU: return bool in __rmap_write_protect Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-20 8:17 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] KVM: MMU: abstract spte write-protect Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-20 21:33 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-21 1:10 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-21 4:34 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-21 3:24 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-21 4:18 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-21 6:52 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-20 8:18 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] KVM: VMX: export PFEC.P bit on ept Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-20 8:18 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] KVM: MMU: introduce SPTE_ALLOW_WRITE bit Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-20 21:39 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-21 3:30 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-21 4:22 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-21 6:55 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-22 15:12 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-23 7:24 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-20 8:19 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2012-04-20 21:52 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] KVM: MMU: introduce SPTE_WRITE_PROTECT bit Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-21 0:40 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-21 0:55 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-21 1:38 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-21 4:29 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-21 4:00 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-24 0:45 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-24 3:34 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-21 3:47 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-21 4:38 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-21 7:25 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-24 0:24 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-20 8:19 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] KVM: MMU: fast path of handling guest page fault Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-20 8:20 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] KVM: MMU: trace fast " Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-20 8:20 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] KVM: MMU: fix kvm_mmu_pagetable_walk tracepoint Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-20 8:21 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] KVM: MMU: document mmu-lock and fast page fault Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-21 0:59 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] KVM: MMU: " Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F911C05.2070701@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.