All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Emil Goode <emilgoode@gmail.com>,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/tty: Use get_user instead of dereferencing user pointer
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 14:04:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F92BE52.4020908@symas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F927804.4090208@suse.cz>

Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 04/20/2012 11:00 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
>> It's not simple however, so can anyone work out or remember wtf the code
>> should be doing ???
>
> Huh.
>
> The code was added by:
> commit 26df6d13406d1a53b0bda08bd712f1924affd7cd
> Author: hyc@symas.com<hyc@symas.com>
> Date:   Tue Jun 22 10:14:49 2010 -0700
>
>      tty: Add EXTPROC support for LINEMODE
>
> ==
>
> The code is now:
>
> retval = copy_to_user(*b,&tty->read_buf[tty->read_tail], n);
> n -= retval;
> tty_audit_add_data(tty,&tty->read_buf[tty->read_tail], n);
> spin_lock_irqsave(&tty->read_lock, flags);
> tty->read_tail = (tty->read_tail + n)&  (N_TTY_BUF_SIZE-1);
> tty->read_cnt -= n;
> if (L_EXTPROC(tty)&&  tty->icanon&&  n = 1) {
>          if (!tty->read_cnt&&  (*b)[n-1] = EOF_CHAR(tty))
>                  n--;
> }
>
> ==
>
> n after "n -= retval" means number of successfully copied chars. So the
> test "n = 1" along with "!tty->read_cnt" actually should ensure we
> copied everything and that is exactly one char. Further we test if that
> one is EOF. If so, ignore that char by pretending we copied nothing.

Correct.

> However the implementation does not count with buffer wrapped like:
> EOF..........................something
>                               ^----- tail
>
> Here, the first call to copy_from_read_buf copies "something" and the
> second one is to copy single EOF. But that would be ignored! Is this
> expected?

Hmmm, probably not expected, no. The intent was to pass the EOF character 
through if it's part of a non-empty input line. But if the EOF is the first 
character on an input line, it should be treated as an EOF and no data 
returned from the read.

> So to fix the user buffer dereference, the following diff should help.
> In any case the wrapped buffer is still to be fixed... (Or ignored.)
> --- a/drivers/tty/n_tty.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/n_tty.c
> @@ -1630,6 +1630,7 @@ static int copy_from_read_buf(struct tty_struct *tty,
>          int retval;
>          size_t n;
>          unsigned long flags;
> +       bool is_eof;
>
>          retval = 0;
>          spin_lock_irqsave(&tty->read_lock, flags);
> @@ -1639,15 +1640,15 @@ static int copy_from_read_buf(struct tty_struct
> *tty,
>          if (n) {
>                  retval = copy_to_user(*b,
> &tty->read_buf[tty->read_tail], n);
>                  n -= retval;
> +               is_eof = n = 1&&
> +                       tty->read_buf[tty->read_tail] = EOF_CHAR(tty);
>                  tty_audit_add_data(tty,&tty->read_buf[tty->read_tail], n);
>                  spin_lock_irqsave(&tty->read_lock, flags);
>                  tty->read_tail = (tty->read_tail + n)&  (N_TTY_BUF_SIZE-1);
>                  tty->read_cnt -= n;
>                  /* Turn single EOF into zero-length read */
> -               if (L_EXTPROC(tty)&&  tty->icanon&&  n = 1) {
> -                       if (!tty->read_cnt&&  (*b)[n-1] = EOF_CHAR(tty))
> -                               n--;
> -               }
> +               if (L_EXTPROC(tty)&&  tty->icanon&&  is_eof&&
> !tty->read_cnt)
> +                       n = 0;
>                  spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty->read_lock, flags);
>                  *b += n;
>                  *nr -= n;
>
> thanks,


-- 
   -- Howard Chu
   CTO, Symas Corp.           http://www.symas.com
   Director, Highland Sun     http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
   Chief Architect, OpenLDAP  http://www.openldap.org/project/

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Emil Goode <emilgoode@gmail.com>,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/tty: Use get_user instead of dereferencing user pointer
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 07:04:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F92BE52.4020908@symas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F927804.4090208@suse.cz>

Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 04/20/2012 11:00 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
>> It's not simple however, so can anyone work out or remember wtf the code
>> should be doing ???
>
> Huh.
>
> The code was added by:
> commit 26df6d13406d1a53b0bda08bd712f1924affd7cd
> Author: hyc@symas.com<hyc@symas.com>
> Date:   Tue Jun 22 10:14:49 2010 -0700
>
>      tty: Add EXTPROC support for LINEMODE
>
> ====
>
> The code is now:
>
> retval = copy_to_user(*b,&tty->read_buf[tty->read_tail], n);
> n -= retval;
> tty_audit_add_data(tty,&tty->read_buf[tty->read_tail], n);
> spin_lock_irqsave(&tty->read_lock, flags);
> tty->read_tail = (tty->read_tail + n)&  (N_TTY_BUF_SIZE-1);
> tty->read_cnt -= n;
> if (L_EXTPROC(tty)&&  tty->icanon&&  n == 1) {
>          if (!tty->read_cnt&&  (*b)[n-1] == EOF_CHAR(tty))
>                  n--;
> }
>
> ====
>
> n after "n -= retval" means number of successfully copied chars. So the
> test "n == 1" along with "!tty->read_cnt" actually should ensure we
> copied everything and that is exactly one char. Further we test if that
> one is EOF. If so, ignore that char by pretending we copied nothing.

Correct.

> However the implementation does not count with buffer wrapped like:
> EOF..........................something
>                               ^----- tail
>
> Here, the first call to copy_from_read_buf copies "something" and the
> second one is to copy single EOF. But that would be ignored! Is this
> expected?

Hmmm, probably not expected, no. The intent was to pass the EOF character 
through if it's part of a non-empty input line. But if the EOF is the first 
character on an input line, it should be treated as an EOF and no data 
returned from the read.

> So to fix the user buffer dereference, the following diff should help.
> In any case the wrapped buffer is still to be fixed... (Or ignored.)
> --- a/drivers/tty/n_tty.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/n_tty.c
> @@ -1630,6 +1630,7 @@ static int copy_from_read_buf(struct tty_struct *tty,
>          int retval;
>          size_t n;
>          unsigned long flags;
> +       bool is_eof;
>
>          retval = 0;
>          spin_lock_irqsave(&tty->read_lock, flags);
> @@ -1639,15 +1640,15 @@ static int copy_from_read_buf(struct tty_struct
> *tty,
>          if (n) {
>                  retval = copy_to_user(*b,
> &tty->read_buf[tty->read_tail], n);
>                  n -= retval;
> +               is_eof = n == 1&&
> +                       tty->read_buf[tty->read_tail] == EOF_CHAR(tty);
>                  tty_audit_add_data(tty,&tty->read_buf[tty->read_tail], n);
>                  spin_lock_irqsave(&tty->read_lock, flags);
>                  tty->read_tail = (tty->read_tail + n)&  (N_TTY_BUF_SIZE-1);
>                  tty->read_cnt -= n;
>                  /* Turn single EOF into zero-length read */
> -               if (L_EXTPROC(tty)&&  tty->icanon&&  n == 1) {
> -                       if (!tty->read_cnt&&  (*b)[n-1] == EOF_CHAR(tty))
> -                               n--;
> -               }
> +               if (L_EXTPROC(tty)&&  tty->icanon&&  is_eof&&
> !tty->read_cnt)
> +                       n = 0;
>                  spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty->read_lock, flags);
>                  *b += n;
>                  *nr -= n;
>
> thanks,


-- 
   -- Howard Chu
   CTO, Symas Corp.           http://www.symas.com
   Director, Highland Sun     http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
   Chief Architect, OpenLDAP  http://www.openldap.org/project/

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-21 14:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-20 15:52 [PATCH] drivers/tty: Use get_user instead of dereferencing user pointer Emil Goode
2012-04-20 15:52 ` Emil Goode
2012-04-20 20:59 ` Alan Cox
2012-04-20 21:00   ` Alan Cox
2012-04-21  9:04   ` Jiri Slaby
2012-04-21  9:04     ` Jiri Slaby
2012-04-21 14:04     ` Howard Chu [this message]
2012-04-21 14:04       ` Howard Chu
2012-04-21 14:25       ` Howard Chu
2012-04-21 14:25         ` Howard Chu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F92BE52.4020908@symas.com \
    --to=hyc@symas.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=emilgoode@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.