All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Lord <kernel@teksavvy.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] libata-eh don't waste time retrying media errors (v3)
Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 15:22:52 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FA1898C.5070108@teksavvy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120502155414.GB21677@google.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1823 bytes --]

ATA and SATA drives have had built-in retries for media errors
for as long as they've been commonplace in computers (early 1990s).

When libata stumbles across a bad sector, it can waste minutes
sitting there doing retry after retry before finally giving up
and letting the higher layers deal with it.

This patch removes retries for media errors only.

Signed-off-by: Mark Lord <mlord@pobox.com>
---
version 3: try to improve readability.

--- old/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c	2012-04-27 13:17:35.000000000 -0400
+++ linux/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c	2012-05-02 15:20:19.946827031 -0400
@@ -2046,6 +2046,26 @@
 }

 /**
+ *	ata_eh_worth_retry - analyze error and decide whether to retry
+ *	@qc: qc to possibly retry
+ *
+ *	Look at the cause of the error and decide if a retry
+ * 	might be useful or not.  We don't want to retry media errors
+ *	because the drive itself has probably already taken 10-30 seconds
+ *	doing its own internal retries before reporting the failure.
+ */
+static inline int ata_eh_worth_retry(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
+{
+	if (qc->flags & AC_ERR_MEDIA)
+		return 0;	/* don't retry media errors */
+	if (qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_IO)
+		return 1;	/* otherwise retry anything from fs stack */
+	if (qc->err_mask & AC_ERR_INVALID)
+		return 0;	/* don't retry these */
+	return qc->err_mask != AC_ERR_DEV;  /* retry if not dev error */
+}
+
+/**
  *	ata_eh_link_autopsy - analyze error and determine recovery action
  *	@link: host link to perform autopsy on
  *
@@ -2119,9 +2139,7 @@
 			qc->err_mask &= ~(AC_ERR_DEV | AC_ERR_OTHER);

 		/* determine whether the command is worth retrying */
-		if (qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_IO ||
-		    (!(qc->err_mask & AC_ERR_INVALID) &&
-		     qc->err_mask != AC_ERR_DEV))
+		if (ata_eh_worth_retry(qc))
 			qc->flags |= ATA_QCFLAG_RETRY;

 		/* accumulate error info */

[-- Attachment #2: 02_libata_sata_dont_retry_media_errors.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1385 bytes --]

--- old/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c	2012-04-27 13:17:35.000000000 -0400
+++ linux/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c	2012-05-02 15:20:19.946827031 -0400
@@ -2046,6 +2046,26 @@
 }
 
 /**
+ *	ata_eh_worth_retry - analyze error and decide whether to retry
+ *	@qc: qc to possibly retry
+ *
+ *	Look at the cause of the error and decide if a retry
+ * 	might be useful or not.  We don't want to retry media errors
+ *	because the drive itself has probably already taken 10-30 seconds
+ *	doing its own internal retries before reporting the failure.
+ */
+static inline int ata_eh_worth_retry(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
+{
+	if (qc->flags & AC_ERR_MEDIA)
+		return 0;	/* don't retry media errors */
+	if (qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_IO)
+		return 1;	/* otherwise retry anything from fs stack */
+	if (qc->err_mask & AC_ERR_INVALID)
+		return 0;	/* don't retry these */
+	return qc->err_mask != AC_ERR_DEV;  /* retry if not dev error */
+}
+
+/**
  *	ata_eh_link_autopsy - analyze error and determine recovery action
  *	@link: host link to perform autopsy on
  *
@@ -2119,9 +2139,7 @@
 			qc->err_mask &= ~(AC_ERR_DEV | AC_ERR_OTHER);
 
 		/* determine whether the command is worth retrying */
-		if (qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_IO ||
-		    (!(qc->err_mask & AC_ERR_INVALID) &&
-		     qc->err_mask != AC_ERR_DEV))
+		if (ata_eh_worth_retry(qc))
 			qc->flags |= ATA_QCFLAG_RETRY;
 
 		/* accumulate error info */

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-05-02 19:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-01 20:12 ata_eh_link_autopsy: Bug? Mark Lord
2012-05-01 20:27 ` Mark Lord
2012-05-01 21:58   ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-01 23:48     ` Mark Lord
2012-05-01 23:52       ` Mark Lord
2012-05-02  0:00       ` [PATCH] libata-eh don't waste time retrying media errors Mark Lord
2012-05-02  3:03         ` [PATCH] libata-eh don't waste time retrying media errors (v2) Mark Lord
2012-05-02 15:54           ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-02 19:10             ` Mark Lord
2012-05-02 19:22             ` Mark Lord [this message]
2012-05-02 19:33               ` [PATCH] libata-eh don't waste time retrying media errors (v3) Tejun Heo
2012-05-02 19:43                 ` Mark Lord
2012-05-02 19:46                   ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-04  2:25                     ` Jeff Garzik
2012-05-04  3:04                       ` Mark Lord

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FA1898C.5070108@teksavvy.com \
    --to=kernel@teksavvy.com \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.