* Stable I2C branch needed as a dependency for Tegra change
@ 2012-05-03 23:19 ` Stephen Warren
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Warren @ 2012-05-03 23:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wolfram Sang, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
ARM kernel mailing list
Wolfram,
A change I'd like to make for Tegra in 3,5:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg172756.html
relies on an I2C change that's also scheduled for 3.5:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg07808.html
(which is already committed as 1475e39 "of/i2c: implement
of_find_i2c_adapter_by_node")
Is your i2c-embedded/for-next branch stable (i.e. that commit will not
be rebased between now and when you send a pull request for 3.5), so I
can use it as a baseline for a Tegra branch? If not, could you let me
know when it is stable, so I can create the Tegra branch as that time.
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Stable I2C branch needed as a dependency for Tegra change
@ 2012-05-03 23:19 ` Stephen Warren
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Warren @ 2012-05-03 23:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Wolfram,
A change I'd like to make for Tegra in 3,5:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg172756.html
relies on an I2C change that's also scheduled for 3.5:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg07808.html
(which is already committed as 1475e39 "of/i2c: implement
of_find_i2c_adapter_by_node")
Is your i2c-embedded/for-next branch stable (i.e. that commit will not
be rebased between now and when you send a pull request for 3.5), so I
can use it as a baseline for a Tegra branch? If not, could you let me
know when it is stable, so I can create the Tegra branch as that time.
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Stable I2C branch needed as a dependency for Tegra change
2012-05-03 23:19 ` Stephen Warren
@ 2012-05-12 18:45 ` Wolfram Sang
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2012-05-12 18:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Warren
Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
ARM kernel mailing list
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 742 bytes --]
Hi,
> Is your i2c-embedded/for-next branch stable (i.e. that commit will not
> be rebased between now and when you send a pull request for 3.5), so I
> can use it as a baseline for a Tegra branch? If not, could you let me
> know when it is stable, so I can create the Tegra branch as that time.
Because of my holidays coming along, I'd think my for-next branch is
done now (except for additions maybe). Yet, when and how to rewind the
branch and/or offering a stable base in general is another thing I need
to scratch my head about afterwards.
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Stable I2C branch needed as a dependency for Tegra change
@ 2012-05-12 18:45 ` Wolfram Sang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2012-05-12 18:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hi,
> Is your i2c-embedded/for-next branch stable (i.e. that commit will not
> be rebased between now and when you send a pull request for 3.5), so I
> can use it as a baseline for a Tegra branch? If not, could you let me
> know when it is stable, so I can create the Tegra branch as that time.
Because of my holidays coming along, I'd think my for-next branch is
done now (except for additions maybe). Yet, when and how to rewind the
branch and/or offering a stable base in general is another thing I need
to scratch my head about afterwards.
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120512/fbddbaad/attachment.sig>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Stable I2C branch needed as a dependency for Tegra change
2012-05-12 18:45 ` Wolfram Sang
@ 2012-05-13 4:21 ` Stephen Warren
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Warren @ 2012-05-13 4:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wolfram Sang
Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
ARM kernel mailing list
On 05/12/2012 12:45 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Is your i2c-embedded/for-next branch stable (i.e. that commit
>> will not be rebased between now and when you send a pull request
>> for 3.5), so I can use it as a baseline for a Tegra branch? If
>> not, could you let me know when it is stable, so I can create the
>> Tegra branch as that time.
>
> Because of my holidays coming along, I'd think my for-next branch
> is done now (except for additions maybe). Yet, when and how to
> rewind the branch and/or offering a stable base in general is
> another thing I need to scratch my head about afterwards.
No worries then; I'll hold the dependent patch until 3.6; that way
there won't be any specific dependencies.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Stable I2C branch needed as a dependency for Tegra change
@ 2012-05-13 4:21 ` Stephen Warren
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Warren @ 2012-05-13 4:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 05/12/2012 12:45 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Is your i2c-embedded/for-next branch stable (i.e. that commit
>> will not be rebased between now and when you send a pull request
>> for 3.5), so I can use it as a baseline for a Tegra branch? If
>> not, could you let me know when it is stable, so I can create the
>> Tegra branch as that time.
>
> Because of my holidays coming along, I'd think my for-next branch
> is done now (except for additions maybe). Yet, when and how to
> rewind the branch and/or offering a stable base in general is
> another thing I need to scratch my head about afterwards.
No worries then; I'll hold the dependent patch until 3.6; that way
there won't be any specific dependencies.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-05-13 4:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-05-03 23:19 Stable I2C branch needed as a dependency for Tegra change Stephen Warren
2012-05-03 23:19 ` Stephen Warren
[not found] ` <4FA31297.8000904-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-12 18:45 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-05-12 18:45 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20120512184515.GC28973-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-13 4:21 ` Stephen Warren
2012-05-13 4:21 ` Stephen Warren
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.