All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: X86: Remove stale values from ctxt->memop before emulation
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 13:18:01 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FA7A159.8050109@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120507101225.GH4687@amd.com>

On 05/07/2012 01:12 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 11:21:52AM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> > > index d4bf50c..1b516ec 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> > > @@ -3937,6 +3937,7 @@ int x86_decode_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, void *insn, int insn_len)
> > >  	struct opcode opcode;
> > >  
> > >  	ctxt->memop.type = OP_NONE;
> > > +	ctxt->memop.val  = 0;
> > >  	ctxt->memopp = NULL;
> > >  	ctxt->_eip = ctxt->eip;
> > >  	ctxt->fetch.start = ctxt->_eip;
> > 
> > This only works for long sized values - it doesn't initialize val64 on
> > i386, for example.  So I think it's better to change bsr (and family) to
> > use emualte_2op_SrcV_nobyte() instead (which has the added benefit of
> > using the same values as the processor for the "undefined" bits).
>
> Right, thats a better solution. How about the attached patch? The zf
> check shouldn't be necessary anymore because the generated assembly uses
> dst.val as input and output so writeback shouldn't do anything wrong.
> The bsr and bsf unittests all pass again with this patch.
>
> 	Joerg
>
> From e9262f18e90111d32b584084c0b5564cbd728d65 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
> Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 12:05:28 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] KVM: X86: convert bsf/bsr instructions to
>  emulate_2op_SrcV_nobyte()
>
> The instruction emulation for bsrw is broken in KVM because
> the code always uses bsr with 32 or 64 bit operand size for
> emulation. Fix that by using emulate_2op_SrcV_nobyte() macro
> to use guest operand size for emulation.
>

It looks fine.  Do you know what triggered this regression?  (for
figuring out if it's 3.4 material)

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-07 10:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-04 16:14 [PATCH] KVM: X86: Remove stale values from ctxt->memop before emulation Joerg Roedel
2012-05-06  8:21 ` Avi Kivity
2012-05-07 10:12   ` Joerg Roedel
2012-05-07 10:18     ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2012-05-07 10:43       ` Joerg Roedel
2012-05-14  8:32     ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FA7A159.8050109@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.