All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Glauber Costa <glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Suleiman Souhlal
	<suleiman-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
	devel-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	Christoph Lameter <cl-vYTEC60ixJUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Kamezawa Hiroyuki
	<kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker
	<fweisbec-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] slub: show dead memcg caches in a separate file
Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 08:55:14 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FA909A2.2010203@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOJsxLHFS+B64qfhCg-9LPbggPoyvkBSnA8nZPRoV15eeRpi_w-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>

On 05/08/2012 02:42 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 6:30 AM, Glauber Costa<glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>  wrote:
>> But there is another aspect: those dead caches have one thing in common,
>> which is the fact that no new objects will ever be allocated on them. You
>> can't tune them, or do anything with them. I believe it is misleading to
>> include them in slabinfo.
>>
>> The fact that the caches change names - to append "dead" may also break
>> tools, if that is what you are concerned about.
>>
>> For all the above, I think a better semantics for slabinfo is to include the
>> active caches, and leave the dead ones somewhere else.
>
> Can these "dead caches" still hold on to physical memory? If so, they
> must appear in /proc/slabinfo.
Yes, if they didn't, I would show them nowhere, instead of in a separate 
file.

But okay, that's why I sent a separate RFC for that part.
I will revert this behavior.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, devel@openvz.org,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] slub: show dead memcg caches in a separate file
Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 08:55:14 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FA909A2.2010203@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOJsxLHFS+B64qfhCg-9LPbggPoyvkBSnA8nZPRoV15eeRpi_w@mail.gmail.com>

On 05/08/2012 02:42 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 6:30 AM, Glauber Costa<glommer@parallels.com>  wrote:
>> But there is another aspect: those dead caches have one thing in common,
>> which is the fact that no new objects will ever be allocated on them. You
>> can't tune them, or do anything with them. I believe it is misleading to
>> include them in slabinfo.
>>
>> The fact that the caches change names - to append "dead" may also break
>> tools, if that is what you are concerned about.
>>
>> For all the above, I think a better semantics for slabinfo is to include the
>> active caches, and leave the dead ones somewhere else.
>
> Can these "dead caches" still hold on to physical memory? If so, they
> must appear in /proc/slabinfo.
Yes, if they didn't, I would show them nowhere, instead of in a separate 
file.

But okay, that's why I sent a separate RFC for that part.
I will revert this behavior.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-05-08 11:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-03 18:47 [RFC] slub: show dead memcg caches in a separate file Glauber Costa
2012-05-03 18:47 ` Glauber Costa
     [not found] ` <1336070841-1071-1-git-send-email-glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-07 22:04   ` Suleiman Souhlal
2012-05-07 22:04     ` Suleiman Souhlal
     [not found]     ` <CABCjUKDuiN6bq6rbPjE7futyUwTPKsSFWHXCJ-OFf30tgq5WZg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-08  3:30       ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-08  3:30         ` Glauber Costa
2012-05-08  5:42         ` Pekka Enberg
     [not found]           ` <CAOJsxLHFS+B64qfhCg-9LPbggPoyvkBSnA8nZPRoV15eeRpi_w-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-08 11:55             ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2012-05-08 11:55               ` Glauber Costa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FA909A2.2010203@parallels.com \
    --to=glommer-bzqdu9zft3wakbo8gow8eq@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=cl-vYTEC60ixJUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=devel-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=fweisbec-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=penberg-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=suleiman-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.