From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Cc: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com, jean.pihet@newoldbits.com,
tony@atomide.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, patches@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP3/4: consolidate cpuidle Makefile
Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 23:02:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FA989DC.2030800@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wr4mmmgn.fsf@ti.com>
On 05/08/2012 10:44 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Daniel Lezcano<daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> writes:
>
>> Define a CPU_IDLE section in the makefile, declare the functions in
>> the header files conforming to the kernel coding rules and remove the
>> 'define's in the C files.
>>
>> CONFIG_PM is enabled when CPU_IDLE is enabled because the cpuidle drivers
>> use some functions from the pm subsystem.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano<daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet<j-pihet@ti.com>
>
> The changelog doesn't really answer "why" this change is needed. IOW, I
> don't understand from the changelog exactly what problem this patch is
> trying to solve.
>
> AFAICT, it's just shuffling around the dependencies, and changes the
> omap*_idle_init() calls into inline nops instead of function call nops.
Ok, I will modify the changelog. I'm always bad with the changelogs,
this is something I have to improve :) I'm the first one to be happy
when I find a nice description in the patches log.
Thanks.
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP3/4: consolidate cpuidle Makefile
Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 23:02:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FA989DC.2030800@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wr4mmmgn.fsf@ti.com>
On 05/08/2012 10:44 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Daniel Lezcano<daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> writes:
>
>> Define a CPU_IDLE section in the makefile, declare the functions in
>> the header files conforming to the kernel coding rules and remove the
>> 'define's in the C files.
>>
>> CONFIG_PM is enabled when CPU_IDLE is enabled because the cpuidle drivers
>> use some functions from the pm subsystem.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano<daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet<j-pihet@ti.com>
>
> The changelog doesn't really answer "why" this change is needed. IOW, I
> don't understand from the changelog exactly what problem this patch is
> trying to solve.
>
> AFAICT, it's just shuffling around the dependencies, and changes the
> omap*_idle_init() calls into inline nops instead of function call nops.
Ok, I will modify the changelog. I'm always bad with the changelogs,
this is something I have to improve :) I'm the first one to be happy
when I find a nice description in the patches log.
Thanks.
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-08 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-04 17:18 [PATCH 0/2] ARM: OMAP3/4: cpuidle - misc fixes Daniel Lezcano
2012-05-04 17:18 ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-05-04 17:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP3: cpuidle - check the powerdomain lookup Daniel Lezcano
2012-05-04 17:18 ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-05-04 21:23 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-04 21:23 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-04 17:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP3/4: consolidate cpuidle Makefile Daniel Lezcano
2012-05-04 17:18 ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-05-08 20:25 ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-05-08 20:25 ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-05-08 20:45 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-08 20:45 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-08 20:44 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-08 20:44 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-08 21:02 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2012-05-08 21:02 ` Daniel Lezcano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FA989DC.2030800@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=jean.pihet@newoldbits.com \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.