All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mach-shmobile: Emma Mobile EV2 SMP prototype code
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 13:15:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FAA6DE6.3040001@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201205091212.08239.arnd@arndb.de>

On 09/05/12 13:12, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 May 2012, Magnus Damm wrote:
>>  static unsigned int __init shmobile_smp_get_core_count(void)
>>  {
>> @@ -31,6 +32,9 @@ static unsigned int __init shmobile_smp_
>>  	if (is_r8a7779())
>>  		return r8a7779_get_core_count();
>>  
>> +	if (is_emev2())
>> +		return emev2_get_core_count();
>> +
>>  	return 1;
>>  }
>>  
>> @@ -41,6 +45,9 @@ static void __init shmobile_smp_prepare_
>>  
>>  	if (is_r8a7779())
>>  		r8a7779_smp_prepare_cpus();
>> +
>> +	if (is_emev2())
>> +		emev2_smp_prepare_cpus();
>>  }
>>  
>>  int shmobile_platform_cpu_kill(unsigned int cpu)
>> ...
> 
> This shows that we really want an abstraction for soc-specific SMP ops
> even within one platform, and we'll need the same thing for multiplatform.
> 
> Marc Zyngier already proposed a solution for this last year, but I
> think we couldn't agree on the details back then before he lost interest.
> I think we should pick that up again and get it into 3.6 so the code above
> can be simplified and we can do the multiplatform solution. We'll probably
> discuss the details in Hong Kong in a couple of weeks, so there is no
> point in changing it now, but I'd hope that you can migrate this to
> whatever we come up with in the following merge window.

I'm happy to revive the series if there is an interest.

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] mach-shmobile: Emma Mobile EV2 SMP prototype code
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 14:15:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FAA6DE6.3040001@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201205091212.08239.arnd@arndb.de>

On 09/05/12 13:12, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 May 2012, Magnus Damm wrote:
>>  static unsigned int __init shmobile_smp_get_core_count(void)
>>  {
>> @@ -31,6 +32,9 @@ static unsigned int __init shmobile_smp_
>>  	if (is_r8a7779())
>>  		return r8a7779_get_core_count();
>>  
>> +	if (is_emev2())
>> +		return emev2_get_core_count();
>> +
>>  	return 1;
>>  }
>>  
>> @@ -41,6 +45,9 @@ static void __init shmobile_smp_prepare_
>>  
>>  	if (is_r8a7779())
>>  		r8a7779_smp_prepare_cpus();
>> +
>> +	if (is_emev2())
>> +		emev2_smp_prepare_cpus();
>>  }
>>  
>>  int shmobile_platform_cpu_kill(unsigned int cpu)
>> ...
> 
> This shows that we really want an abstraction for soc-specific SMP ops
> even within one platform, and we'll need the same thing for multiplatform.
> 
> Marc Zyngier already proposed a solution for this last year, but I
> think we couldn't agree on the details back then before he lost interest.
> I think we should pick that up again and get it into 3.6 so the code above
> can be simplified and we can do the multiplatform solution. We'll probably
> discuss the details in Hong Kong in a couple of weeks, so there is no
> point in changing it now, but I'd hope that you can migrate this to
> whatever we come up with in the following merge window.

I'm happy to revive the series if there is an interest.

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"horms@verge.net.au" <horms@verge.net.au>,
	"linux@arm.linux.org.uk" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-sh@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"rjw@sisk.pl" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	"lethal@linux-sh.org" <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
	"olof@lixom.net" <olof@lixom.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mach-shmobile: Emma Mobile EV2 SMP prototype code
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 14:15:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FAA6DE6.3040001@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201205091212.08239.arnd@arndb.de>

On 09/05/12 13:12, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 May 2012, Magnus Damm wrote:
>>  static unsigned int __init shmobile_smp_get_core_count(void)
>>  {
>> @@ -31,6 +32,9 @@ static unsigned int __init shmobile_smp_
>>  	if (is_r8a7779())
>>  		return r8a7779_get_core_count();
>>  
>> +	if (is_emev2())
>> +		return emev2_get_core_count();
>> +
>>  	return 1;
>>  }
>>  
>> @@ -41,6 +45,9 @@ static void __init shmobile_smp_prepare_
>>  
>>  	if (is_r8a7779())
>>  		r8a7779_smp_prepare_cpus();
>> +
>> +	if (is_emev2())
>> +		emev2_smp_prepare_cpus();
>>  }
>>  
>>  int shmobile_platform_cpu_kill(unsigned int cpu)
>> ...
> 
> This shows that we really want an abstraction for soc-specific SMP ops
> even within one platform, and we'll need the same thing for multiplatform.
> 
> Marc Zyngier already proposed a solution for this last year, but I
> think we couldn't agree on the details back then before he lost interest.
> I think we should pick that up again and get it into 3.6 so the code above
> can be simplified and we can do the multiplatform solution. We'll probably
> discuss the details in Hong Kong in a couple of weeks, so there is no
> point in changing it now, but I'd hope that you can migrate this to
> whatever we come up with in the following merge window.

I'm happy to revive the series if there is an interest.

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...


  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-09 13:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-09  7:54 [PATCH] mach-shmobile: Emma Mobile EV2 SMP prototype code Magnus Damm
2012-05-09  7:54 ` Magnus Damm
2012-05-09  7:54 ` Magnus Damm
2012-05-09 12:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-09 12:12   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-09 12:12   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-09 13:15   ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2012-05-09 13:15     ` Marc Zyngier
2012-05-09 13:15     ` Marc Zyngier
2012-05-09 13:45     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-09 13:45       ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-09 13:45       ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-09 13:59       ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-05-09 13:59         ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-05-09 13:59         ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-05-09 14:13         ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-09 14:13           ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-09 14:13           ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-09 14:52       ` Magnus Damm
2012-05-09 14:52         ` Magnus Damm
2012-05-09 14:52         ` Magnus Damm
2012-05-11  7:13 ` Simon Horman
2012-05-11  7:13   ` Simon Horman
2012-05-11  7:13   ` Simon Horman
2012-05-11  8:05   ` Simon Horman
2012-05-11  8:05     ` Simon Horman
2012-05-11  8:05     ` Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FAA6DE6.3040001@arm.com \
    --to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.