All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
To: Phil Turmel <philip@turmel.org>
Cc: Daniel Pocock <daniel@pocock.com.au>,
	Marcus Sorensen <shadowsor@gmail.com>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: md RAID with enterprise-class SATA or SAS drives
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 10:50:19 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FACB6AB.40104@msgid.tls.msk.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FAC1259.6090407@turmel.org>

On 10.05.2012 23:09, Phil Turmel wrote:
>> For my old Barracuda 7200.12 that is still working, I see this:
>> > 
>> > SCT Error Recovery Control:
>> >            Read: Disabled
>> >           Write: Disabled
> You should try changing it.  Drives that don't support it won't even
> show you that.

You made me curious and I checked 3 identical drives I have
in raid setup in my server.  These are (somewhat oldish by
now) WD Caviar Black 640Gb ones.  Here are the identifies:

Model Family:     Western Digital Caviar Black family

Device Model:     WDC WD6401AALS-00L3B2
Serial Number:    WD-WCASYA623503
Firmware Version: 01.03B01

Device Model:     WDC WD6401AALS-00L3B2
Serial Number:    WD-WCASY4134266
Firmware Version: 01.03B01

Device Model:     WDC WD6401AALS-00L3B2
Serial Number:    WD-WCASY4137254
Firmware Version: 01.03B01


First one is more recent, bought about a year after last 2.
As you can see, everything looks exactly the same, incl.
exact model number and firmware version.  Yet, the more
recent (first) does NOT support SCT Error Recovery Control,
returning error to any -l strec command, but the other 2,
which are older, supports setting these parameters (but
I've no idea if the timeouts will actually be used by the
firmware, this is entirely different question :).  So,
3 identical drives bought within a year, shows identical
versions and models, but behaves differently...

I also noticed that all recent desktop drives from WD does
NOT support strec, while older ones tend to support it.
Which goes on-par with what others are saying.  I wonder
how this goes in drives of other manufacturers...

Thanks,

/mjt

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-05-11  6:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-09 22:00 md RAID with enterprise-class SATA or SAS drives Daniel Pocock
2012-05-09 22:33 ` Marcus Sorensen
2012-05-10 13:34   ` Daniel Pocock
2012-05-10 13:51   ` Phil Turmel
2012-05-10 14:59     ` Daniel Pocock
2012-05-10 15:15       ` Phil Turmel
2012-05-10 15:26     ` Marcus Sorensen
2012-05-10 16:04       ` Phil Turmel
2012-05-10 17:53         ` Keith Keller
2012-05-10 18:10           ` Mathias Burén
2012-05-10 18:23           ` Phil Turmel
2012-05-10 19:15             ` Keith Keller
2012-05-10 18:42         ` Daniel Pocock
2012-05-10 19:09           ` Phil Turmel
2012-05-10 20:30             ` Daniel Pocock
2012-05-11  6:50             ` Michael Tokarev [this message]
2012-05-21 14:19           ` Brian Candler
2012-05-21 14:29             ` Phil Turmel
2012-05-26 21:58               ` Stefan *St0fF* Huebner
2012-05-10 21:43       ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-05-10 23:00         ` Marcus Sorensen
2012-05-10 21:15     ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-05-10 21:31       ` Daniel Pocock
2012-05-11  1:53         ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-05-11  8:31           ` Daniel Pocock
2012-05-11 13:54             ` Pierre Beck
2012-05-10 21:41       ` Phil Turmel
2012-05-10 22:27       ` David Brown
2012-05-10 22:37         ` Daniel Pocock
     [not found]         ` <CABYL=ToORULrdhBVQk0K8zQqFYkOomY-wgG7PpnJnzP9u7iBnA@mail.gmail.com>
2012-05-11  7:10           ` David Brown
2012-05-11  8:16             ` Daniel Pocock
2012-05-11 22:28               ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-05-21 15:20                 ` CoolCold
2012-05-21 18:51                   ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-05-21 18:54                     ` Roberto Spadim
2012-05-21 19:05                       ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-05-21 19:38                         ` Roberto Spadim
2012-05-21 23:34                     ` NeilBrown
2012-05-22  6:36                       ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-05-22  7:29                         ` David Brown
2012-05-23 13:14                           ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-05-23 13:27                             ` Roberto Spadim
2012-05-23 19:49                             ` David Brown
2012-05-23 23:46                               ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-05-24  1:18                                 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-05-24  2:08                                   ` NeilBrown
2012-05-24  6:16                                     ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-05-24  2:10                         ` NeilBrown
2012-05-24  2:55                           ` Roberto Spadim
2012-05-11 22:17             ` Stan Hoeppner
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-05-10  1:29 Richard Scobie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FACB6AB.40104@msgid.tls.msk.ru \
    --to=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
    --cc=daniel@pocock.com.au \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=philip@turmel.org \
    --cc=shadowsor@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.