All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@am.sony.com>
To: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
	"Rowand, Frank" <Frank_Rowand@sonyusa.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC - rt-tools: Detect whether numa is available at build time
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 17:49:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC41D20.1010105@am.sony.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1337989189-17563-1-git-send-email-jkacur@redhat.com>

On 05/25/12 16:39, John Kacur wrote:
> This is a preliminary hack, I need to clean it up a little, but incase you
> want to give it a try, here is the alpha version.
> 
> Note - I stole this methodology from tools/perf
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>

I knew I would regret suggesting this fix.

It works fine on my fedora 12 x86_64 system for native build.

It works fine on my fedora 12 x86_64 system for crossbuild for ARM.

The NUMA=0 option is still useful (thank you for leaving that
in place).  I have a second ARM target board, where the cross
linker does not complain about libnuma, so cyclictest is
build with libnuma.  But my run time environment does not have
a libnuma.  Ah the joy of pre-release file systems.  The NUMA=0
option allowed me to properly build cyclictest to run on this
not quite yet finished file system.

Tested-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@am.sony.com>

-Frank


  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-29  0:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-25 23:39 [PATCH] RFC - rt-tools: Detect whether numa is available at build time John Kacur
2012-05-29  0:49 ` Frank Rowand [this message]
2012-05-30 19:58   ` John Kacur
2012-05-30 21:48     ` Frank Rowand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FC41D20.1010105@am.sony.com \
    --to=frank.rowand@am.sony.com \
    --cc=Frank_Rowand@sonyusa.com \
    --cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=williams@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.