All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@am.sony.com>
To: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Cc: "Rowand, Frank" <Frank_Rowand@sonyusa.com>,
	Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC - rt-tools: Detect whether numa is available at build time
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 14:48:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC69591.30806@am.sony.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAONaPpE0eezsxwmWXV5zkavkEYiYHRXHX6EBBYOVw0W6vuvnCg@mail.gmail.com>

On 05/30/12 12:58, John Kacur wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@am.sony.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 05/25/12 16:39, John Kacur wrote:
>>> This is a preliminary hack, I need to clean it up a little, but incase
>>> you
>>> want to give it a try, here is the alpha version.
>>>
>>> Note - I stole this methodology from tools/perf
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
>>
>> I knew I would regret suggesting this fix.
>>
>> It works fine on my fedora 12 x86_64 system for native build.
>>
>> It works fine on my fedora 12 x86_64 system for crossbuild for ARM.
>>
>> The NUMA=0 option is still useful (thank you for leaving that
>> in place).  I have a second ARM target board, where the cross
>> linker does not complain about libnuma, so cyclictest is
>> build with libnuma.  But my run time environment does not have
>> a libnuma.  Ah the joy of pre-release file systems.  The NUMA=0
>> option allowed me to properly build cyclictest to run on this
>> not quite yet finished file system.
>>
>> Tested-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@am.sony.com>
>>
> 
> Thank you very much for testing my quick hack. (tglx has anointed it
> the beer on the couch hack)
> What happens when you run a compiled with libnuma binary on a ARM
> target that doesn't have numa, as long as you don't supply the numa
> function?

I'm not sure if I understand your question.  But if I build with libnuma
then try to run it on a target that does not have the library, I get:

$ ./cyclictest_numa
./cyclictest_numa: error while loading shared libraries: libnuma.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

Which is not surprising, given:

$ ldd ./cyclictest_numa 
        librt.so.1 => /devel/lib/librt.so.1 (0xb6f4d000)
        libpthread.so.0 => /devel/lib/libpthread.so.0 (0xb6f2d000)
        libnuma.so.1 => not found
        libgcc_s.so.1 => /devel/usr/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0xb6f1a000)
        libc.so.6 => /devel/lib/libc.so.6 (0xb6de2000)
        /devel/lib/ld-linux.so.3 (0xb6f5c000)

-Frank


      reply	other threads:[~2012-05-30 21:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-25 23:39 [PATCH] RFC - rt-tools: Detect whether numa is available at build time John Kacur
2012-05-29  0:49 ` Frank Rowand
2012-05-30 19:58   ` John Kacur
2012-05-30 21:48     ` Frank Rowand [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FC69591.30806@am.sony.com \
    --to=frank.rowand@am.sony.com \
    --cc=Frank_Rowand@sonyusa.com \
    --cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=williams@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.