From: Tao Ma <tm@tao.ma>
To: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Protect group inode free counting with group lock.
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 22:28:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC4DD12.4020007@tao.ma> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120529123950.GC16351@thunk.org>
On 05/29/2012 08:39 PM, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:57:59PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>>> We are just disabling the uninit_bg so as to let the block group
>>> initialization happen in the mkfs time. I don't know why the checksum is
>>> also disabled by ^uninit_bg.
>>
>> The checksum is controlled by uninit_bg, because there was a need to
>> ensure the bg_itable_unused count and the UNINIT flags could be
>> trusted when doing an e2fsck.
>>
>> If you don't want to do lazy inode table initialization, that is
>> disabled by "mke2fs -E lazy_itable_init=0".
>
> You can also disable whether or not lazy inode table initialization
> happens by default via /etc/mke2fs.conf. At work we have a very
> fairly havily modified /etc/mke2fs.conf which has our
> production-specific mke2fs parameters defined, so that someone who
> runs mke2fs by hand will get the same result at as the automated
> systems.
>
> I can easily see how if you are trying for predictable latency
> numbers, disabling lazy inode table initialization makes a huge amount
> of sense. I'd recommend doing it via /etc/mke2fs.conf, though.
OK, thank you all for the good suggestion.
Thanks
Tao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-29 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-16 8:49 [PATCH] ext4: Protect group inode free counting with group lock Tao Ma
2012-05-16 13:43 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-05-16 14:55 ` Tao Ma
2012-05-16 15:49 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-05-17 2:17 ` Tao Ma
2012-05-17 3:14 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-05-28 22:22 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-05-29 2:18 ` Tao Ma
2012-05-29 5:57 ` Andreas Dilger
2012-05-29 12:39 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-05-29 14:28 ` Tao Ma [this message]
2012-05-16 14:58 ` Andreas Dilger
2012-05-16 15:10 ` Tao Ma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FC4DD12.4020007@tao.ma \
--to=tm@tao.ma \
--cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.