All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: arm: Remaining issue with alignment of __log_buf in printk.c
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 10:14:16 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC4F5D8.8090701@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FC25048.109@wwwdotorg.org>

On 05/27/2012 10:03 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 05/27/2012 06:39 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> My stargate 2 board refused to start and after bisection I ended
>> up at the same patch that Stephen found an alignment issue in.
>> Unfortunately Stephen's patch doesn't seem to have fixed the
>> issue for me.
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/5/10/510 is the thread.  Patch from
>> Stephen is : f8450fca6ecdea38b5a882fdf6cd097e3ec8651c
>>
>> Increasing the alignement for 32 bit systems to 8 seems to do the
>> job but I can't immediately think why...
>>
>> System is a pxa27x strong arm.
...
> #if !defined(CONFIG_64BIT) || defined(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)
> #define LOG_ALIGN 4
> #else
> #define LOG_ALIGN 8
> #endif

Actually, why not replace that with:

#define LOG_ALIGN (__alignof__(struct log_buf))

That way, the compiler will calculate the arch-/ABI-appropriate
alignment value automatically and correctly in all cases, so we won't
have to fix that ifdef above.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>, Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: kay.sievers@vrfy.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: arm: Remaining issue with alignment of __log_buf in printk.c
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 10:14:16 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC4F5D8.8090701@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FC25048.109@wwwdotorg.org>

On 05/27/2012 10:03 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 05/27/2012 06:39 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> My stargate 2 board refused to start and after bisection I ended
>> up at the same patch that Stephen found an alignment issue in.
>> Unfortunately Stephen's patch doesn't seem to have fixed the
>> issue for me.
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/5/10/510 is the thread.  Patch from
>> Stephen is : f8450fca6ecdea38b5a882fdf6cd097e3ec8651c
>>
>> Increasing the alignement for 32 bit systems to 8 seems to do the
>> job but I can't immediately think why...
>>
>> System is a pxa27x strong arm.
...
> #if !defined(CONFIG_64BIT) || defined(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)
> #define LOG_ALIGN 4
> #else
> #define LOG_ALIGN 8
> #endif

Actually, why not replace that with:

#define LOG_ALIGN (__alignof__(struct log_buf))

That way, the compiler will calculate the arch-/ABI-appropriate
alignment value automatically and correctly in all cases, so we won't
have to fix that ifdef above.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-05-29 16:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-27 12:39 arm: Remaining issue with alignment of __log_buf in printk.c Jonathan Cameron
2012-05-27 12:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2012-05-27 16:03 ` Stephen Warren
2012-05-27 16:03   ` Stephen Warren
2012-05-27 16:14   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-05-27 16:14     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-05-27 17:01     ` Jonathan Cameron
2012-05-27 17:01       ` Jonathan Cameron
2012-05-29 16:14   ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2012-05-29 16:14     ` Stephen Warren
2012-05-29 16:32     ` Kay Sievers
2012-05-29 16:32       ` Kay Sievers
2012-05-29 17:13       ` Stephen Warren
2012-05-29 17:13         ` Stephen Warren
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-05-27 12:39 Jonathan Cameron
2012-05-27 12:39 ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FC4F5D8.8090701@wwwdotorg.org \
    --to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.