From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] Ath9k performance testing results (AR9380)
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 22:18:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC6FF1B.7050201@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20422.56339.579488.464864@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
On 05/30/2012 07:48 PM, Sujith Manoharan wrote:
> Ben Greear wrote:
>> I am not sure why there is such a big difference, but possibly
>> sending wifi is harder than receiving it, and the Atom processor
>> just can't keep up.
>
> I have a small Atom-based netbook, I'll try with it and see what numbers
> can be seen. It's a pain to pry it open and bolt a different card, though. :)
We had to install a hacked 'white-listed' BIOS to get a Lenovo laptop to even POST with
an Atheros NIC in it, so if your NIC works w/out having to hack the BIOS, please
let me know :)
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Sujith Manoharan <c_manoha@qca.qualcomm.com>
Cc: "ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Ath9k performance testing results (AR9380)
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 22:18:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC6FF1B.7050201@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20422.56339.579488.464864@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
On 05/30/2012 07:48 PM, Sujith Manoharan wrote:
> Ben Greear wrote:
>> I am not sure why there is such a big difference, but possibly
>> sending wifi is harder than receiving it, and the Atom processor
>> just can't keep up.
>
> I have a small Atom-based netbook, I'll try with it and see what numbers
> can be seen. It's a pain to pry it open and bolt a different card, though. :)
We had to install a hacked 'white-listed' BIOS to get a Lenovo laptop to even POST with
an Atheros NIC in it, so if your NIC works w/out having to hack the BIOS, please
let me know :)
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-31 5:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-29 22:57 [ath9k-devel] Ath9k performance testing results (AR9380) Ben Greear
2012-05-29 22:57 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-31 2:48 ` [ath9k-devel] " Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-31 2:48 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-31 5:18 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2012-05-31 5:18 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-31 6:35 ` [ath9k-devel] " Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-31 6:35 ` Sujith Manoharan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FC6FF1B.7050201@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.