All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: srinivas.bakki@nxp.com, lars@metafoo.de,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, leiwen@marvell.com,
	devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, dedekind1@gmail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kevin.wells@nxp.com,
	b32955@freescale.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	hechtb@googlemail.com, dwmw2@infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] MTD: LPC32xx SLC NAND driver
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 21:49:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FCBBFD4.9090401@antcom.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120603190932.GB23368@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

Hi!

Thanks for the suggestions!

On 03/06/12 21:09, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> +	dma_async_issue_pending(host->dma_chan);
>> +
>> +	wait_for_completion_timeout(&host->comp, msecs_to_jiffies(1000));
> 
> What about unmapping the buffer upon completion?

OK - by not specifying DMA_COMPL_SKIP_*_UNMAP in flags, I was thinking
that this happens somehow magically. ;-) But maybe I was just confused.

Thanks,

Roland

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: stigge@antcom.de (Roland Stigge)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4] MTD: LPC32xx SLC NAND driver
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 21:49:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FCBBFD4.9090401@antcom.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120603190932.GB23368@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

Hi!

Thanks for the suggestions!

On 03/06/12 21:09, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> +	dma_async_issue_pending(host->dma_chan);
>> +
>> +	wait_for_completion_timeout(&host->comp, msecs_to_jiffies(1000));
> 
> What about unmapping the buffer upon completion?

OK - by not specifying DMA_COMPL_SKIP_*_UNMAP in flags, I was thinking
that this happens somehow magically. ;-) But maybe I was just confused.

Thanks,

Roland

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
	dwmw2@infradead.org, kevin.wells@nxp.com, srinivas.bakki@nxp.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, hechtb@googlemail.com,
	lars@metafoo.de, b32955@freescale.com, leiwen@marvell.com,
	dedekind1@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] MTD: LPC32xx SLC NAND driver
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 21:49:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FCBBFD4.9090401@antcom.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120603190932.GB23368@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

Hi!

Thanks for the suggestions!

On 03/06/12 21:09, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> +	dma_async_issue_pending(host->dma_chan);
>> +
>> +	wait_for_completion_timeout(&host->comp, msecs_to_jiffies(1000));
> 
> What about unmapping the buffer upon completion?

OK - by not specifying DMA_COMPL_SKIP_*_UNMAP in flags, I was thinking
that this happens somehow magically. ;-) But maybe I was just confused.

Thanks,

Roland

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-06-03 19:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-03 18:38 [PATCH v4] MTD: LPC32xx SLC NAND driver Roland Stigge
2012-06-03 18:38 ` Roland Stigge
2012-06-03 19:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-06-03 19:09   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-06-03 19:09   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-06-03 19:09   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-06-03 19:27   ` PLEASE, REMOVE MY EMAIL ADDRESS FROM ITS LIST William F.
2012-06-03 19:33     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-06-03 19:33       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-06-03 19:33       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-06-03 23:07       ` William F.
2012-06-03 23:07         ` William F.
2012-06-03 23:07         ` William F.
2012-06-03 19:49   ` Roland Stigge [this message]
2012-06-03 19:49     ` [PATCH v4] MTD: LPC32xx SLC NAND driver Roland Stigge
2012-06-03 19:49     ` Roland Stigge
2012-06-03 20:37     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-06-03 20:37       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-06-03 20:37       ` Russell King - ARM Linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FCBBFD4.9090401@antcom.de \
    --to=stigge@antcom.de \
    --cc=b32955@freescale.com \
    --cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=hechtb@googlemail.com \
    --cc=kevin.wells@nxp.com \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=leiwen@marvell.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=srinivas.bakki@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.