From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>,
Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: WARNING: at mm/page-writeback.c:1990 __set_page_dirty_nobuffers+0x13a/0x170()
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 11:30:40 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FCC1DD0.8090003@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHGf_=qVsqdsrfZw5xHOBboM5_eNFqWcBKjUyNXmAxNDNuuV_A@mail.gmail.com>
On 06/04/2012 10:26 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>> Right. I missed that. I think we can use the page passed to rescue_unmovable_pageblock.
>> We make sure it's valid in isolate_freepages. So how about this?
>>
>> barrios@bbox:~/linux-2.6$ git diff
>> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
>> index 4ac338a..7459ab5 100644
>> --- a/mm/compaction.c
>> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
>> @@ -368,11 +368,11 @@ isolate_migratepages_range(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc,
>> static bool rescue_unmovable_pageblock(struct page *page)
>> {
>> unsigned long pfn, start_pfn, end_pfn;
>> - struct page *start_page, *end_page;
>> + struct page *start_page, *end_page, *cursor_page;
>>
>> pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
>> start_pfn = pfn & ~(pageblock_nr_pages - 1);
>> - end_pfn = start_pfn + pageblock_nr_pages;
>> + end_pfn = start_pfn + pageblock_nr_pages - 1;
>>
>> start_page = pfn_to_page(start_pfn);
>> end_page = pfn_to_page(end_pfn);
>> @@ -381,19 +381,19 @@ static bool rescue_unmovable_pageblock(struct page *page)
>> if (page_zone(start_page) != page_zone(end_page))
>> return false;
>>
>> - for (page = start_page, pfn = start_pfn; page < end_page; pfn++,
>> - page++) {
>> + for (cursor_page = start_page, pfn = start_pfn; cursor_page <= end_page; pfn++,
>> + cursor_page++) {
>> if (!pfn_valid_within(pfn))
>> continue;
>
> I guess page_zone() should be used after pfn_valid_within(). Why can
> we assume invalid
> pfn return correct zone?
Right you are. We can't make sure it in case of CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE.
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>,
Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: WARNING: at mm/page-writeback.c:1990 __set_page_dirty_nobuffers+0x13a/0x170()
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 11:30:40 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FCC1DD0.8090003@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHGf_=qVsqdsrfZw5xHOBboM5_eNFqWcBKjUyNXmAxNDNuuV_A@mail.gmail.com>
On 06/04/2012 10:26 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>> Right. I missed that. I think we can use the page passed to rescue_unmovable_pageblock.
>> We make sure it's valid in isolate_freepages. So how about this?
>>
>> barrios@bbox:~/linux-2.6$ git diff
>> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
>> index 4ac338a..7459ab5 100644
>> --- a/mm/compaction.c
>> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
>> @@ -368,11 +368,11 @@ isolate_migratepages_range(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc,
>> static bool rescue_unmovable_pageblock(struct page *page)
>> {
>> unsigned long pfn, start_pfn, end_pfn;
>> - struct page *start_page, *end_page;
>> + struct page *start_page, *end_page, *cursor_page;
>>
>> pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
>> start_pfn = pfn & ~(pageblock_nr_pages - 1);
>> - end_pfn = start_pfn + pageblock_nr_pages;
>> + end_pfn = start_pfn + pageblock_nr_pages - 1;
>>
>> start_page = pfn_to_page(start_pfn);
>> end_page = pfn_to_page(end_pfn);
>> @@ -381,19 +381,19 @@ static bool rescue_unmovable_pageblock(struct page *page)
>> if (page_zone(start_page) != page_zone(end_page))
>> return false;
>>
>> - for (page = start_page, pfn = start_pfn; page < end_page; pfn++,
>> - page++) {
>> + for (cursor_page = start_page, pfn = start_pfn; cursor_page <= end_page; pfn++,
>> + cursor_page++) {
>> if (!pfn_valid_within(pfn))
>> continue;
>
> I guess page_zone() should be used after pfn_valid_within(). Why can
> we assume invalid
> pfn return correct zone?
Right you are. We can't make sure it in case of CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE.
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-04 2:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 87+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-30 16:33 WARNING: at mm/page-writeback.c:1990 __set_page_dirty_nobuffers+0x13a/0x170() Dave Jones
2012-05-30 16:33 ` Dave Jones
2012-05-31 0:57 ` Dave Jones
2012-05-31 0:57 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-01 2:31 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-01 2:31 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-01 2:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-06-01 2:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-06-01 13:43 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-01 13:43 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-01 8:44 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-06-01 8:44 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-06-01 8:51 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-06-01 8:51 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-06-01 9:08 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-06-01 9:08 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-06-01 9:12 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-06-01 9:12 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-06-01 14:09 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-01 14:09 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-01 14:14 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-01 14:14 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-01 16:12 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-01 16:12 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-01 17:16 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-01 17:16 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-01 22:17 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-06-01 22:17 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-06-02 1:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-06-02 1:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-06-02 4:40 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-06-02 4:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-06-02 4:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-06-02 7:20 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-06-02 7:20 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-06-02 7:17 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-06-02 7:17 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-06-02 7:22 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-06-02 7:22 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-06-02 7:27 ` [PATCH] mm: fix warning in __set_page_dirty_nobuffers Hugh Dickins
2012-06-02 7:27 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-06-03 18:15 ` WARNING: at mm/page-writeback.c:1990 __set_page_dirty_nobuffers+0x13a/0x170() Dave Jones
2012-06-03 18:15 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-03 18:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-06-03 18:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-06-03 18:31 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-03 18:31 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-03 20:53 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-03 20:53 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-03 21:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-06-03 21:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-06-03 22:13 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-03 22:13 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-03 22:29 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-06-03 22:29 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-06-03 22:17 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-06-03 22:17 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-06-03 23:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-06-03 23:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-06-04 0:46 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-06-04 0:46 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-06-04 1:18 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-06-04 1:18 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-06-04 1:21 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-04 1:21 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-04 1:26 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-06-04 1:26 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-06-04 2:30 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2012-06-04 2:30 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-04 1:10 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-04 1:10 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-04 1:41 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-06-04 1:41 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-06-04 1:47 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-06-04 1:47 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-06-04 2:28 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-04 2:28 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-04 4:21 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-06-04 4:21 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-06-04 13:37 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2012-06-04 13:37 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2012-06-01 16:16 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-06-01 16:16 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-06-01 16:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-06-01 16:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-06-01 16:39 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-06-01 16:39 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FCC1DD0.8090003@kernel.org \
--to=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=markus@trippelsdorf.de \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.