All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: mturquette@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/24] Move OMAP2+ over to use COMMON clock
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 14:08:10 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FCC73F2.4030808@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1206010735540.17068@utopia.booyaka.com>

On Friday 01 June 2012 07:07 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2012, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>
>> This RFC series is based of Mikes' latest clk-next. I will
>> rebase it once 3.5-rc1 is out and post with more testing thats
>> in progress. Meanwhile, the RFC is for me to get some early
>> feedback on the patches.
>
> Please describe further what's been tested with this series, and what
> hasn't been.

Hi Paul,

I have been mostly boot-testing on the OMAP3/4 boards I have access to, 
3430SDP, 3630 Beagle, 4430 Panda/SDP. Apart from this I was using
omapconf to run the clkspeed audit tests on OMAP4.
I used powerdebug to make sure the tree modeling (parent/child
relations, clk rates etc) are sane after bootup.
I haven't done any low power tests around suspend/idle for OMAP3
or OMAP4 which is on my list to do before I do a repost/rebase on
3.5-rc1. And so is testing on OMAP2430sdp and N800. Any other tests
you recommend I do?

Meanwhile it would be good to know if you see any major issues around
the migration itself and/or the way the patches are structured.

regards,
Rajendra

>
>
> - Paul


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: rnayak@ti.com (Rajendra Nayak)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC 00/24] Move OMAP2+ over to use COMMON clock
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 14:08:10 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FCC73F2.4030808@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1206010735540.17068@utopia.booyaka.com>

On Friday 01 June 2012 07:07 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2012, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>
>> This RFC series is based of Mikes' latest clk-next. I will
>> rebase it once 3.5-rc1 is out and post with more testing thats
>> in progress. Meanwhile, the RFC is for me to get some early
>> feedback on the patches.
>
> Please describe further what's been tested with this series, and what
> hasn't been.

Hi Paul,

I have been mostly boot-testing on the OMAP3/4 boards I have access to, 
3430SDP, 3630 Beagle, 4430 Panda/SDP. Apart from this I was using
omapconf to run the clkspeed audit tests on OMAP4.
I used powerdebug to make sure the tree modeling (parent/child
relations, clk rates etc) are sane after bootup.
I haven't done any low power tests around suspend/idle for OMAP3
or OMAP4 which is on my list to do before I do a repost/rebase on
3.5-rc1. And so is testing on OMAP2430sdp and N800. Any other tests
you recommend I do?

Meanwhile it would be good to know if you see any major issues around
the migration itself and/or the way the patches are structured.

regards,
Rajendra

>
>
> - Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-04  8:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-01 12:07 [RFC 00/24] Move OMAP2+ over to use COMMON clock Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:07 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:07 ` [RFC 01/24] clk: Add CLK_IS_BASIC flag to identify basic clocks Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:07   ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:07 ` [RFC 02/24] ARM: omap4: cm: add bitfield width values Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:07   ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:07 ` [RFC 03/24] ARM: omap: clk: convert all clk_enable to clk_prepare_enable Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:07   ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:07 ` [RFC 04/24] ARM: omap: hwmod: get rid of all omap_clk_get_by_name usage Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:07   ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:07 ` [RFC 05/24] ARM: omap: clk: Nuke plat clock.c & clock.h if CONFIG_COMMON_CLK Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:07   ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-04 13:57   ` Jon Hunter
2012-06-04 13:57     ` Jon Hunter
2012-06-04 14:16     ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-04 14:16       ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-04 14:25       ` Jon Hunter
2012-06-04 14:25         ` Jon Hunter
2012-06-05  4:58         ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-05  4:58           ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-05 13:11           ` Jon Hunter
2012-06-05 13:11             ` Jon Hunter
2012-06-01 12:07 ` [RFC 06/24] ARM: omap: clk: Remove all direct dereferncing of struct clk Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:07   ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:07 ` [RFC 07/24] ARM: omap: hwmod: Fix up hwmod based clkdm accesses Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:07   ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:07 ` [RFC 08/24] ARM: omap4: clk: Convert to common clk Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:07   ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:07 ` [RFC 09/24] ARM: omap3: " Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:07   ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:07 ` [RFC 10/24] ARM: omap2: " Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:07   ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:07 ` [RFC 11/24] ARM: omap: clk: list all clk_hw_omap clks to enable/disable autoidle Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:07   ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-04  5:44   ` Tony Lindgren
2012-06-04  5:44     ` Tony Lindgren
2012-06-04  8:53     ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-04  8:53       ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:07 ` [RFC 12/24] ARM: omap: clk: Define a function to enable clocks at init Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:07   ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:07 ` [RFC 13/24] ARM: omap4: clk: Add 44xx data using common struct clk Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:07   ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-04 22:14   ` Jon Hunter
2012-06-04 22:14     ` Jon Hunter
2012-06-05  4:35     ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-05  4:35       ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-05  6:42   ` Tony Lindgren
2012-06-05  6:42     ` Tony Lindgren
2012-06-05  6:44     ` Tony Lindgren
2012-06-05  6:44       ` Tony Lindgren
2012-06-07  5:29     ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-07  5:29       ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-20 11:39       ` Tony Lindgren
2012-06-20 11:39         ` Tony Lindgren
2012-06-21  6:28         ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-21  6:28           ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-21  7:00           ` Tony Lindgren
2012-06-21  7:00             ` Tony Lindgren
2012-06-01 12:07 ` [RFC 14/24] ARM: omap3: clk: Add 3xxx " Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:07   ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:07 ` [RFC 15/24] ARM: omap2: clk: Add 24xx " Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:07   ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:07 ` [RFC 16/24] ARM: omap: clk: Switch to COMMON clk Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:07   ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:07 ` [RFC 17/24] ARM: omap: clk: Use plat clock.c & clock.h only for OMAP1 Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:07   ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:07 ` [RFC 18/24] ARM: omap: hwmod: Cleanup !CONFIG_COMMON_CLK parts Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:07   ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:08 ` [RFC 19/24] ARM: omap4: clk: " Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:08   ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:08 ` [RFC 20/24] ARM: omap3: " Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:08   ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:08 ` [RFC 21/24] ARM: omap2: " Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:08   ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:08 ` [RFC 22/24] ARM: omap4: clk: Delete old OMAP clock data Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:08   ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:08 ` [RFC 23/24] ARM: omap3: " Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:08   ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:08 ` [RFC 24/24] ARM: omap2: " Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 12:08   ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 13:37 ` [RFC 00/24] Move OMAP2+ over to use COMMON clock Paul Walmsley
2012-06-01 13:37   ` Paul Walmsley
2012-06-04  8:38   ` Rajendra Nayak [this message]
2012-06-04  8:38     ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-01 17:58 ` Mike Turquette
2012-06-01 17:58   ` Mike Turquette
2012-06-01 20:37 ` Jon Hunter
2012-06-01 20:37   ` Jon Hunter
2012-06-01 23:27 ` Jon Hunter
2012-06-01 23:27   ` Jon Hunter
2012-06-04  8:52   ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-04  8:52     ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-04 13:51     ` Jon Hunter
2012-06-04 13:51       ` Jon Hunter
2012-06-04 14:04       ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-04 14:04         ` Rajendra Nayak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FCC73F2.4030808@ti.com \
    --to=rnayak@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@ti.com \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.