All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
To: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: menu: use nr_running instead of cpuload for calculating perf mult
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 06:15:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FCCB4DD.4060407@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1338805485-10874-1-git-send-email-vdavydov@parallels.com>

On 6/4/2012 3:24 AM, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> rq->cpuload strongly depends on cgroup hierarchy. For example, if hundreds of
> tasks are running inside cpu:/test cgroup, the sum of cpuload over all cpus
> won't exceed 1024 (by default). That makes the cpuidle menu governor take wrong
> decisions, which can negatively affect overall performance.

nr_running is the wrong answer... it is instantaneous, not longer term.
cpuidle wants a longer term, per cpu, notion of "busy", to use as proxy
for performance sensitivity.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-06-04 13:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-04 10:24 [PATCH] cpuidle: menu: use nr_running instead of cpuload for calculating perf mult Vladimir Davydov
2012-06-04 10:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-04 10:50   ` Vladimir Davydov
2012-06-04 13:13   ` Arjan van de Ven
2012-06-04 13:45     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-04 13:48       ` Arjan van de Ven
2012-06-04 15:08         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-04 15:14           ` Arjan van de Ven
2012-06-04 15:26             ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-04 15:39               ` Arjan van de Ven
2012-06-04 16:33                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-04 16:53                   ` Arjan van de Ven
2012-06-04 17:08                     ` Vladimir Davydov
2012-06-04 17:17                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-04 17:16                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-04 17:25                       ` Arjan van de Ven
2012-06-04 20:31                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-04 20:45                           ` Arjan van de Ven
2012-06-04 21:14                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-04 20:40                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05  3:48                 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-06-04 13:15 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2012-06-04 13:19   ` Vladimir Davydov
2012-11-27 19:02 ` Vladimir Davydov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FCCB4DD.4060407@linux.intel.com \
    --to=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=vdavydov@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.