All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Philippe De Muyter <phdm@macqel.be>,
	Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k: Use generic strncpy_from_user(), strlen_user(), and strnlen_user()
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 16:31:50 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FCEF956.9090603@snapgear.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdW29QYN6XpBb9F3GGoJ-9frrD-00Wx=FchT9ALqW1LcPg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Geert,

On 06/06/12 06:57, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Philippe De Muyter<phdm@macqel.be>  wrote:
>> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 01:20:02PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Philippe De Muyter<phdm@macqel.be>  wrote:
>>>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:33:36PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven<geert@linux-m68k.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Do we also want
>>>>>
>>>>> 	select HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS if (!COLDFIRE&&  !M68000)
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, I did not follow what happened to unaligned accesses, but
>>>> CPU32 family (at least 68340) crashes on unaligned accesses.
>>>
>>> We don't seem to have CONFIG_M68340 in arch/m68k/Kconfig.cpu?
>>
>> I have a local port here (but based on an ancient linux kernel, 2.6.2 IIRC)
>>
>>> But Freescale's website confirms both 68340 and 68360 are CPU32.
>>>
>>> arch/m68k/include/asm/unaligned.h assumes CPU32 (CONFIG_MCPU32)
>>> can do unaligned accesses:
>>
>> That's not true. Accessing a 16- or 32-bit word at an odd address
>> with a 68340 generates an Address Error Exception. I remember
>> discovering a bug in the ppp kernel code because of that.
>>
>>>
>>> #if defined(CONFIG_COLDFIRE) || defined(CONFIG_M68000)
>>> #include<linux/unaligned/be_struct.h>
>>> #include<linux/unaligned/le_byteshift.h>
>>> #include<linux/unaligned/generic.h>
>>>
>>> #define get_unaligned	__get_unaligned_be
>>> #define put_unaligned	__put_unaligned_be
>>>
>>> #else
>>> /*
>>>  * The m68k can do unaligned accesses itself.
>>>  */
>>> #include<linux/unaligned/access_ok.h>
>>> #include<linux/unaligned/generic.h>
>>>
>>> #define get_unaligned	__get_unaligned_be
>>> #define put_unaligned	__put_unaligned_be
>>>
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> Is this wrong?
>>
>> I can't tell from reading just the lines above, but I think one should add
>> "|| defined(CONFIG_MCPU32)" at the end of the if condition.
>
> Greg?
>
> If more CPUs cannot handle unaligned accesses, I propose to add
> CONFIG_CPU_HAS_NO_UNALIGNED.

Yes, looks like that should have a "|| defined(CONFIG_CPU32)".
(According to the CPU32 reference manual words and long words must
be aligned on word boundaries.)

I think something like CONFIG_CPU_HAS_NO_UNALIGNED makes sense.


>> I also think that the Coldfire 5272 can do unaligned accesses, but I
>> cannot test that at the moment.

According to the MCF5272 User Manual, "it supports misaligned data
accesses ...". So it looks like it does.

Having a CONFIG_CPU_HAS_NO_UNALIGNED looks like a really good solution
then. We need to be able select it as required on individual CPU types.

Regards
Greg



------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer  --  Principal Engineer        EMAIL:     gerg@snapgear.com
SnapGear Group, McAfee                      PHONE:       +61 7 3435 2888
8 Gardner Close                             FAX:         +61 7 3217 5323
Milton, QLD, 4064, Australia                WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Philippe De Muyter <phdm@macqel.be>,
	Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>, <linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k: Use generic strncpy_from_user(), strlen_user(), and strnlen_user()
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 16:31:50 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FCEF956.9090603@snapgear.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdW29QYN6XpBb9F3GGoJ-9frrD-00Wx=FchT9ALqW1LcPg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Geert,

On 06/06/12 06:57, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Philippe De Muyter<phdm@macqel.be>  wrote:
>> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 01:20:02PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Philippe De Muyter<phdm@macqel.be>  wrote:
>>>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:33:36PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven<geert@linux-m68k.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Do we also want
>>>>>
>>>>> 	select HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS if (!COLDFIRE&&  !M68000)
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, I did not follow what happened to unaligned accesses, but
>>>> CPU32 family (at least 68340) crashes on unaligned accesses.
>>>
>>> We don't seem to have CONFIG_M68340 in arch/m68k/Kconfig.cpu?
>>
>> I have a local port here (but based on an ancient linux kernel, 2.6.2 IIRC)
>>
>>> But Freescale's website confirms both 68340 and 68360 are CPU32.
>>>
>>> arch/m68k/include/asm/unaligned.h assumes CPU32 (CONFIG_MCPU32)
>>> can do unaligned accesses:
>>
>> That's not true. Accessing a 16- or 32-bit word at an odd address
>> with a 68340 generates an Address Error Exception. I remember
>> discovering a bug in the ppp kernel code because of that.
>>
>>>
>>> #if defined(CONFIG_COLDFIRE) || defined(CONFIG_M68000)
>>> #include<linux/unaligned/be_struct.h>
>>> #include<linux/unaligned/le_byteshift.h>
>>> #include<linux/unaligned/generic.h>
>>>
>>> #define get_unaligned	__get_unaligned_be
>>> #define put_unaligned	__put_unaligned_be
>>>
>>> #else
>>> /*
>>>  * The m68k can do unaligned accesses itself.
>>>  */
>>> #include<linux/unaligned/access_ok.h>
>>> #include<linux/unaligned/generic.h>
>>>
>>> #define get_unaligned	__get_unaligned_be
>>> #define put_unaligned	__put_unaligned_be
>>>
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> Is this wrong?
>>
>> I can't tell from reading just the lines above, but I think one should add
>> "|| defined(CONFIG_MCPU32)" at the end of the if condition.
>
> Greg?
>
> If more CPUs cannot handle unaligned accesses, I propose to add
> CONFIG_CPU_HAS_NO_UNALIGNED.

Yes, looks like that should have a "|| defined(CONFIG_CPU32)".
(According to the CPU32 reference manual words and long words must
be aligned on word boundaries.)

I think something like CONFIG_CPU_HAS_NO_UNALIGNED makes sense.


>> I also think that the Coldfire 5272 can do unaligned accesses, but I
>> cannot test that at the moment.

According to the MCF5272 User Manual, "it supports misaligned data
accesses ...". So it looks like it does.

Having a CONFIG_CPU_HAS_NO_UNALIGNED looks like a really good solution
then. We need to be able select it as required on individual CPU types.

Regards
Greg



------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer  --  Principal Engineer        EMAIL:     gerg@snapgear.com
SnapGear Group, McAfee                      PHONE:       +61 7 3435 2888
8 Gardner Close                             FAX:         +61 7 3217 5323
Milton, QLD, 4064, Australia                WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com

  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-06  6:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-29 21:33 [PATCH] m68k: Use generic strncpy_from_user(), strlen_user(), and strnlen_user() Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-05-29 21:33 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-05-30  3:07 ` Greg Ungerer
2012-05-30  3:07   ` Greg Ungerer
2012-05-30 10:22 ` Philippe De Muyter
2012-05-30 10:22   ` Philippe De Muyter
2012-05-30 11:20   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-05-30 11:20   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-05-30 14:04     ` Philippe De Muyter
2012-05-30 14:04       ` Philippe De Muyter
2012-06-05 20:57       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-06-06  6:31         ` Greg Ungerer [this message]
2012-06-06  6:31           ` Greg Ungerer
2012-06-06 17:46           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-06-06 17:46           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-06-07 11:10             ` Greg Ungerer
2012-06-07 11:10               ` Greg Ungerer
2012-06-07 13:14               ` Andreas Schwab
2012-06-08  4:14                 ` Greg Ungerer
2012-06-08  4:14                 ` Greg Ungerer
2012-06-07 13:14               ` Andreas Schwab
2012-06-05 20:57       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-06-06 13:44       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-06-06 13:44         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-06-06 15:20         ` Philippe De Muyter
2012-06-06 15:20           ` Philippe De Muyter
2012-05-30 14:42     ` Andreas Schwab
2012-05-30 14:42       ` Andreas Schwab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FCEF956.9090603@snapgear.com \
    --to=gerg@snapgear.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=gerg@uclinux.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=phdm@macqel.be \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.