From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
Cc: dan.magenheimer@oracle.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] mm: frontswap: split frontswap_shrink further to simplify locking
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:49:06 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FD586D2.2070803@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1339325468-30614-6-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com>
On 06/10/2012 07:51 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> Split frontswap_shrink to simplify the locking in the original code.
>
> Also, assert that the function that was split still runs under the
> swap spinlock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
> ---
> mm/frontswap.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/frontswap.c b/mm/frontswap.c
> index faa43b7..e6353d9 100644
> --- a/mm/frontswap.c
> +++ b/mm/frontswap.c
> @@ -265,6 +265,24 @@ static int __frontswap_unuse_pages(unsigned long total, unsigned long *unused,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int __frontswap_shrink(unsigned long target_pages,
> + unsigned long *pages_to_unuse,
> + int *type)
__frontswap_shrink isn't good name.
This function doesn't shrink at all.
How about __frontswap_shrink_pages with description of function?
> +{
> + unsigned long total_pages = 0, total_pages_to_unuse;
> +
> + assert_spin_locked(&swap_lock);
About assertion, it's ditto with my previous reply.
> +
> + total_pages = __frontswap_curr_pages();
> + if (total_pages <= target_pages) {
> + /* Nothing to do */
> + *pages_to_unuse = 0;
> + return 0;
> + }
> + total_pages_to_unuse = total_pages - target_pages;
> + return __frontswap_unuse_pages(total_pages_to_unuse, pages_to_unuse, type);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Frontswap, like a true swap device, may unnecessarily retain pages
> * under certain circumstances; "shrink" frontswap is essentially a
> @@ -275,10 +293,8 @@ static int __frontswap_unuse_pages(unsigned long total, unsigned long *unused,
> */
> void frontswap_shrink(unsigned long target_pages)
> {
> - unsigned long total_pages = 0, total_pages_to_unuse;
> unsigned long pages_to_unuse = 0;
> int type, ret;
> - bool locked = false;
>
> /*
> * we don't want to hold swap_lock while doing a very
> @@ -286,20 +302,10 @@ void frontswap_shrink(unsigned long target_pages)
> * so restart scan from swap_list.head each time
> */
> spin_lock(&swap_lock);
> - locked = true;
> - total_pages = __frontswap_curr_pages();
> - if (total_pages <= target_pages)
> - goto out;
> - total_pages_to_unuse = total_pages - target_pages;
> - ret = __frontswap_unuse_pages(total_pages_to_unuse, &pages_to_unuse, &type);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - goto out;
> - locked = false;
> + ret = __frontswap_shrink(target_pages, &pages_to_unuse, &type);
> spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
> - try_to_unuse(type, true, pages_to_unuse);
> -out:
> - if (locked)
> - spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
> + if (ret == 0 && pages_to_unuse)
> + try_to_unuse(type, true, pages_to_unuse);
> return;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(frontswap_shrink);
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
Cc: dan.magenheimer@oracle.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] mm: frontswap: split frontswap_shrink further to simplify locking
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:49:06 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FD586D2.2070803@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1339325468-30614-6-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com>
On 06/10/2012 07:51 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> Split frontswap_shrink to simplify the locking in the original code.
>
> Also, assert that the function that was split still runs under the
> swap spinlock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
> ---
> mm/frontswap.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/frontswap.c b/mm/frontswap.c
> index faa43b7..e6353d9 100644
> --- a/mm/frontswap.c
> +++ b/mm/frontswap.c
> @@ -265,6 +265,24 @@ static int __frontswap_unuse_pages(unsigned long total, unsigned long *unused,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int __frontswap_shrink(unsigned long target_pages,
> + unsigned long *pages_to_unuse,
> + int *type)
__frontswap_shrink isn't good name.
This function doesn't shrink at all.
How about __frontswap_shrink_pages with description of function?
> +{
> + unsigned long total_pages = 0, total_pages_to_unuse;
> +
> + assert_spin_locked(&swap_lock);
About assertion, it's ditto with my previous reply.
> +
> + total_pages = __frontswap_curr_pages();
> + if (total_pages <= target_pages) {
> + /* Nothing to do */
> + *pages_to_unuse = 0;
> + return 0;
> + }
> + total_pages_to_unuse = total_pages - target_pages;
> + return __frontswap_unuse_pages(total_pages_to_unuse, pages_to_unuse, type);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Frontswap, like a true swap device, may unnecessarily retain pages
> * under certain circumstances; "shrink" frontswap is essentially a
> @@ -275,10 +293,8 @@ static int __frontswap_unuse_pages(unsigned long total, unsigned long *unused,
> */
> void frontswap_shrink(unsigned long target_pages)
> {
> - unsigned long total_pages = 0, total_pages_to_unuse;
> unsigned long pages_to_unuse = 0;
> int type, ret;
> - bool locked = false;
>
> /*
> * we don't want to hold swap_lock while doing a very
> @@ -286,20 +302,10 @@ void frontswap_shrink(unsigned long target_pages)
> * so restart scan from swap_list.head each time
> */
> spin_lock(&swap_lock);
> - locked = true;
> - total_pages = __frontswap_curr_pages();
> - if (total_pages <= target_pages)
> - goto out;
> - total_pages_to_unuse = total_pages - target_pages;
> - ret = __frontswap_unuse_pages(total_pages_to_unuse, &pages_to_unuse, &type);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - goto out;
> - locked = false;
> + ret = __frontswap_shrink(target_pages, &pages_to_unuse, &type);
> spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
> - try_to_unuse(type, true, pages_to_unuse);
> -out:
> - if (locked)
> - spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
> + if (ret == 0 && pages_to_unuse)
> + try_to_unuse(type, true, pages_to_unuse);
> return;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(frontswap_shrink);
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-11 5:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-10 10:50 [PATCH v3 00/10] minor frontswap cleanups and tracing support Sasha Levin
2012-06-10 10:50 ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-10 10:50 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] mm: frontswap: remove casting from function calls through ops structure Sasha Levin
2012-06-10 10:50 ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-11 5:20 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-11 5:20 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-10 10:51 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] mm: frontswap: trivial coding convention issues Sasha Levin
2012-06-10 10:51 ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-11 5:24 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-11 5:24 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-10 10:51 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] mm: frontswap: split out __frontswap_curr_pages Sasha Levin
2012-06-10 10:51 ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-11 5:28 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-11 5:28 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-10 10:51 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] mm: frontswap: split out __frontswap_unuse_pages Sasha Levin
2012-06-10 10:51 ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-11 5:43 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-11 5:43 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-11 10:30 ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-11 10:30 ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-11 14:27 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-06-11 14:27 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-06-11 14:31 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-06-11 14:31 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-06-11 14:38 ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-11 14:38 ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-10 10:51 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] mm: frontswap: split frontswap_shrink further to simplify locking Sasha Levin
2012-06-10 10:51 ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-11 5:49 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2012-06-11 5:49 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-10 10:51 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] mm: frontswap: make all branches of if statement in put page consistent Sasha Levin
2012-06-10 10:51 ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-11 5:52 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-11 5:52 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-10 10:51 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] mm: frontswap: remove unnecessary check during initialization Sasha Levin
2012-06-10 10:51 ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-11 5:54 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-11 5:54 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-10 10:51 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] mm: frontswap: add tracing support Sasha Levin
2012-06-10 10:51 ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-11 6:12 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-11 6:12 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-11 8:33 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-06-11 8:33 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-06-11 10:39 ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-11 10:39 ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-10 10:51 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] mm: frontswap: split out function to clear a page out Sasha Levin
2012-06-10 10:51 ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-11 6:16 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-11 6:16 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-10 10:51 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] mm: frontswap: remove unneeded headers Sasha Levin
2012-06-10 10:51 ` Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FD586D2.2070803@kernel.org \
--to=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.