From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@google.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] mempolicy: fix a memory corruption by refcount imbalance in alloc_pages_vma()
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:24:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FD60D98.4020807@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1339421596.4942.10.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
(6/11/12 9:33 AM), Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 05:17 -0400, kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: KOSAKI Motohiro<kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
>>
>> commit cc9a6c8776 (cpuset: mm: reduce large amounts of memory barrier related
>> damage v3) introduced a memory corruption.
>>
>> shmem_alloc_page() passes pseudo vma and it has one significant unique
>> combination, vma->vm_ops=NULL and (vma->policy->flags& MPOL_F_SHARED).
>>
>> Now, get_vma_policy() does NOT increase a policy ref when vma->vm_ops=NULL
>> and mpol_cond_put() DOES decrease a policy ref when a policy has MPOL_F_SHARED.
>> Therefore, when alloc_pages_vma() goes 'goto retry_cpuset' path, a policy
>> refcount will be decreased too much and therefore it will make a memory corruption.
> [...]
>> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
>> +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
>> @@ -1544,18 +1544,29 @@ struct mempolicy *get_vma_policy(struct task_struct *task,
>> struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)
>> {
>> struct mempolicy *pol = task->mempolicy;
>> + int got_ref;
>
> = 0
>
> And this should really be a bool.
Good catch. Thanks.
From 6a635a77e7b192413525855e19df7a724c81ae5b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 22:23:46 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] mempolicy: fix a memory corruption by refcount imbalance in alloc_pages_vma()
commit cc9a6c8776 (cpuset: mm: reduce large amounts of memory barrier related
damage v3) introduced a memory corruption.
shmem_alloc_page() passes pseudo vma and it has one significant unique
combination, vma->vm_ops=NULL and (vma->policy->flags & MPOL_F_SHARED).
Now, get_vma_policy() does NOT increase a policy ref when vma->vm_ops=NULL
and mpol_cond_put() DOES decrease a policy ref when a policy has MPOL_F_SHARED.
Therefore, when alloc_pages_vma() goes 'goto retry_cpuset' path, a policy
refcount will be decreased too much and therefore it will make a memory corruption.
This patch fixes it.
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
mm/mempolicy.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
mm/shmem.c | 9 +++++----
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index 7fb7d51..ddde834 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -1544,18 +1544,29 @@ struct mempolicy *get_vma_policy(struct task_struct *task,
struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)
{
struct mempolicy *pol = task->mempolicy;
+ bool got_ref = 0;
if (vma) {
if (vma->vm_ops && vma->vm_ops->get_policy) {
struct mempolicy *vpol = vma->vm_ops->get_policy(vma,
addr);
- if (vpol)
+ if (vpol) {
pol = vpol;
+ got_ref = 1;
+ }
} else if (vma->vm_policy)
pol = vma->vm_policy;
}
if (!pol)
pol = &default_policy;
+
+ /*
+ * shmem_alloc_page() passes MPOL_F_SHARED policy with vma->vm_ops=NULL.
+ * Thus, we need to take additional ref for avoiding refcount imbalance.
+ */
+ if (!got_ref && mpol_needs_cond_ref(pol))
+ mpol_get(pol);
+
return pol;
}
diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
index d576b84..eb5f1eb 100644
--- a/mm/shmem.c
+++ b/mm/shmem.c
@@ -919,6 +919,7 @@ static struct page *shmem_alloc_page(gfp_t gfp,
struct shmem_inode_info *info, pgoff_t index)
{
struct vm_area_struct pvma;
+ struct page *page;
/* Create a pseudo vma that just contains the policy */
pvma.vm_start = 0;
@@ -926,10 +927,10 @@ static struct page *shmem_alloc_page(gfp_t gfp,
pvma.vm_ops = NULL;
pvma.vm_policy = mpol_shared_policy_lookup(&info->policy, index);
- /*
- * alloc_page_vma() will drop the shared policy reference
- */
- return alloc_page_vma(gfp, &pvma, 0);
+ page = alloc_page_vma(gfp, &pvma, 0);
+
+ mpol_put(pvma.vm_policy);
+ return page;
}
#else /* !CONFIG_NUMA */
#ifdef CONFIG_TMPFS
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@google.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] mempolicy: fix a memory corruption by refcount imbalance in alloc_pages_vma()
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:24:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FD60D98.4020807@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1339421596.4942.10.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
(6/11/12 9:33 AM), Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 05:17 -0400, kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: KOSAKI Motohiro<kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
>>
>> commit cc9a6c8776 (cpuset: mm: reduce large amounts of memory barrier related
>> damage v3) introduced a memory corruption.
>>
>> shmem_alloc_page() passes pseudo vma and it has one significant unique
>> combination, vma->vm_ops=NULL and (vma->policy->flags& MPOL_F_SHARED).
>>
>> Now, get_vma_policy() does NOT increase a policy ref when vma->vm_ops=NULL
>> and mpol_cond_put() DOES decrease a policy ref when a policy has MPOL_F_SHARED.
>> Therefore, when alloc_pages_vma() goes 'goto retry_cpuset' path, a policy
>> refcount will be decreased too much and therefore it will make a memory corruption.
> [...]
>> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
>> +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
>> @@ -1544,18 +1544,29 @@ struct mempolicy *get_vma_policy(struct task_struct *task,
>> struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)
>> {
>> struct mempolicy *pol = task->mempolicy;
>> + int got_ref;
>
> = 0
>
> And this should really be a bool.
Good catch. Thanks.
From 6a635a77e7b192413525855e19df7a724c81ae5b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 22:23:46 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] mempolicy: fix a memory corruption by refcount imbalance in alloc_pages_vma()
commit cc9a6c8776 (cpuset: mm: reduce large amounts of memory barrier related
damage v3) introduced a memory corruption.
shmem_alloc_page() passes pseudo vma and it has one significant unique
combination, vma->vm_ops=NULL and (vma->policy->flags & MPOL_F_SHARED).
Now, get_vma_policy() does NOT increase a policy ref when vma->vm_ops=NULL
and mpol_cond_put() DOES decrease a policy ref when a policy has MPOL_F_SHARED.
Therefore, when alloc_pages_vma() goes 'goto retry_cpuset' path, a policy
refcount will be decreased too much and therefore it will make a memory corruption.
This patch fixes it.
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
mm/mempolicy.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
mm/shmem.c | 9 +++++----
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index 7fb7d51..ddde834 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -1544,18 +1544,29 @@ struct mempolicy *get_vma_policy(struct task_struct *task,
struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)
{
struct mempolicy *pol = task->mempolicy;
+ bool got_ref = 0;
if (vma) {
if (vma->vm_ops && vma->vm_ops->get_policy) {
struct mempolicy *vpol = vma->vm_ops->get_policy(vma,
addr);
- if (vpol)
+ if (vpol) {
pol = vpol;
+ got_ref = 1;
+ }
} else if (vma->vm_policy)
pol = vma->vm_policy;
}
if (!pol)
pol = &default_policy;
+
+ /*
+ * shmem_alloc_page() passes MPOL_F_SHARED policy with vma->vm_ops=NULL.
+ * Thus, we need to take additional ref for avoiding refcount imbalance.
+ */
+ if (!got_ref && mpol_needs_cond_ref(pol))
+ mpol_get(pol);
+
return pol;
}
diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
index d576b84..eb5f1eb 100644
--- a/mm/shmem.c
+++ b/mm/shmem.c
@@ -919,6 +919,7 @@ static struct page *shmem_alloc_page(gfp_t gfp,
struct shmem_inode_info *info, pgoff_t index)
{
struct vm_area_struct pvma;
+ struct page *page;
/* Create a pseudo vma that just contains the policy */
pvma.vm_start = 0;
@@ -926,10 +927,10 @@ static struct page *shmem_alloc_page(gfp_t gfp,
pvma.vm_ops = NULL;
pvma.vm_policy = mpol_shared_policy_lookup(&info->policy, index);
- /*
- * alloc_page_vma() will drop the shared policy reference
- */
- return alloc_page_vma(gfp, &pvma, 0);
+ page = alloc_page_vma(gfp, &pvma, 0);
+
+ mpol_put(pvma.vm_policy);
+ return page;
}
#else /* !CONFIG_NUMA */
#ifdef CONFIG_TMPFS
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-11 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-11 9:17 [PATCH 0/6][resend] mempolicy memory corruption fixlet kosaki.motohiro
2012-06-11 9:17 ` kosaki.motohiro
2012-06-11 9:17 ` [PATCH 1/6] Revert "mm: mempolicy: Let vma_merge and vma_split handle vma->vm_policy linkages" kosaki.motohiro
2012-06-11 9:17 ` kosaki.motohiro
2012-06-11 14:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-06-11 14:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-06-11 9:17 ` [PATCH 2/6] mempolicy: remove all mempolicy sharing kosaki.motohiro
2012-06-11 9:17 ` kosaki.motohiro
2012-06-11 15:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-06-11 15:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-06-12 16:46 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-06-12 16:46 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-06-12 16:46 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-06-12 13:55 ` Mel Gorman
2012-06-12 13:55 ` Mel Gorman
2012-06-12 16:45 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-06-12 16:45 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-06-11 9:17 ` [PATCH 3/6] mempolicy: fix a race in shared_policy_replace() kosaki.motohiro
2012-06-11 9:17 ` kosaki.motohiro
2012-06-11 9:17 ` [PATCH 4/6] mempolicy: fix refcount leak in mpol_set_shared_policy() kosaki.motohiro
2012-06-11 9:17 ` kosaki.motohiro
2012-06-11 9:17 ` [PATCH 5/6] mempolicy: fix a memory corruption by refcount imbalance in alloc_pages_vma() kosaki.motohiro
2012-06-11 9:17 ` kosaki.motohiro
2012-06-11 13:33 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-06-11 15:24 ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2012-06-11 15:24 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-06-12 14:20 ` Mel Gorman
2012-06-12 14:20 ` Mel Gorman
2012-06-12 16:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-06-12 16:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-06-11 9:17 ` [PATCH 6/6] MAINTAINERS: Added MEMPOLICY entry kosaki.motohiro
2012-06-11 9:17 ` kosaki.motohiro
2012-06-11 15:01 ` [PATCH 0/6][resend] mempolicy memory corruption fixlet Christoph Lameter
2012-06-11 15:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-07-31 12:33 ` Josh Boyer
2012-07-31 12:33 ` Josh Boyer
2012-08-06 19:32 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-08-06 19:32 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-08-15 11:40 ` Josh Boyer
2012-08-15 11:40 ` Josh Boyer
2012-08-15 20:20 ` Andrew Morton
2012-08-15 20:20 ` Andrew Morton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-05-30 9:02 [PATCH 0/6] " kosaki.motohiro
2012-05-30 9:02 ` [PATCH 5/6] mempolicy: fix a memory corruption by refcount imbalance in alloc_pages_vma() kosaki.motohiro
2012-05-30 9:02 ` kosaki.motohiro
2012-05-30 20:37 ` Andi Kleen
2012-05-30 20:37 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FD60D98.4020807@gmail.com \
--to=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.