From: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: Missing Patch Headers
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 09:44:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FD62077.2030209@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADkTA4PpQYeDwSMs1iss4JoiF1R_szZU4ByMKPwHb=kNrnv=Pw@mail.gmail.com>
On 06/11/2012 08:34 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Saul Wold<sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> Folks,
>>
>> We recently had a spat of new patches added without patch headers, ie no
>> patch comment, Signed-off-by or Upstream-Status.
>>
>> Please review this list and update the patch and submit a new commit.
>>
>> Zhai Edwin -
>> meta/recipes-graphics/pango/pango-1.28.4/multilib-fix-clean.patch
>> Laurentiu Palcu -
>> meta/recipes-graphics/directfb/directfb/libdirect-remove-include-of-linux-config.h.patch
>> Cristian Iorga -
>> meta/recipes-extended/ltp/ltp/fix_building_fom_archive.patch
>> Xiaofeng Yan - meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbinitscripts/functions.patch
>> Mark Hatle - meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/binutils-armv5e.patch
>> Mark Hatle - meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-resolvedep.patch
>> Andreas Müller -
>> meta/recipes-kernel/systemtap/systemtap/runtime-staprun-configure.ac-support-without-nss-for.patch
>> Bruce Ashfield -
>> meta/recipes-kernel/lttng-2.0/lttng-modules/lttng-sycalls-protect-is_compat_task-from-redefiniti.patch
>
> Your script is wrong here. That patch has everything you'd expect,
> since it follows kernel
> patch conventions. Subject, shortlog, log log and sign-off.
>
> So don't expect any resubmission from me on this one, since I won't be
> putting an upstream
> status directly in the patch.
>
This is a patch in OE-Core, not in the kernel, there is no reason you
can't update this patch to include the Upstream-Status:? What is the
status of this patch anyway? Is it a backport?
Sau!
> Bruce
>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> --
>> Sau!
>>
>> Saul Wold
>> Yocto Component Wrangler @ Intel
>> Yocto Project / Poky Build System
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-11 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-11 15:23 Missing Patch Headers Saul Wold
2012-06-11 15:34 ` Bruce Ashfield
2012-06-11 16:44 ` Saul Wold [this message]
2012-06-11 17:16 ` Bruce Ashfield
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FD62077.2030209@linux.intel.com \
--to=sgw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.