Re: [PATCH -mm 3/6] Fix the x86-64 page colouring code to take pgoff into account and use that code as the basis for a generic page colouring code.

[Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>]

On 06/18/2012 04:37 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:

> and your patch has some new ifs in it:
>
> @@ -386,12 +398,16 @@ void validate_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
>   	int bug = 0;
>   	int i = 0;
>   	struct vm_area_struct *tmp = mm->mmap;
> +	unsigned long highest_address = 0;
>   	while (tmp) {
>   		if (tmp->free_gap != max_free_space(&tmp->vm_rb))
>   			printk("free space %lx, correct %lx\n", tmp->free_gap, max_free_space(&tmp->vm_rb)), bug = 1;
>
> 			^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> I think this if-statement is the problem. It is not present in mainline
> but this patch doesn't add it so some patch earlier than that adds it
> which is probably in your queue?

Argh! I see the problem now.

guilt-patchbomb sent everything from my second patch onwards,
not my first patch :(

Let me resend the series properly, I have 7 patches not 6.

I am having a bad email day...

-- 
All rights reversed

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>