All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>
To: gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>,
	Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, fadvise: don't return -EINVAL when filesystem has no optimization way
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 02:33:55 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FE16ED3.2090403@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FE16E50.9030304@cn.fujitsu.com>

(6/20/12 2:31 AM), Wanlong Gao wrote:
> On 06/16/2012 04:36 AM, kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
>>
>> Eric Wong reported his test suite was fail when /tmp is tmpfs.
>>
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/24/479
>>
>> Current,input check of POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED has two problems.
>>
>> 1) require a_ops->readpage.
>>    But in fact, force_page_cache_readahead() only require
>>    a target filesystem has either ->readpage or ->readpages.
>> 2) return -EINVAL when filesystem don't have ->readpage.
>>    But, posix says, it should be retrieved a hint. Thus fadvise()
>>    should return 0 if filesystem has no optimization way.
>>    Especially, userland application don't know a filesystem type
>>    of TMPDIR directory as Eric pointed out. Then, userland can't
>>    avoid this error. We shouldn't encourage to ignore syscall
>>    return value.
>>
>> Thus, this patch change a return value to 0 when filesytem don't
>> support readahead.
>>
>> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
>> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>> Cc: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
>> Tested-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
>> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>>  mm/fadvise.c |   18 +++++++-----------
>>  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/fadvise.c b/mm/fadvise.c
>> index 469491e..33e6baf 100644
>> --- a/mm/fadvise.c
>> +++ b/mm/fadvise.c
>> @@ -93,11 +93,6 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE(fadvise64_64)(int fd, loff_t offset, loff_t len, int advice)
>>  		spin_unlock(&file->f_lock);
>>  		break;
>>  	case POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED:
>> -		if (!mapping->a_ops->readpage) {
>> -			ret = -EINVAL;
>> -			break;
>> -		}
> 
> Why not check both readpage and readpages, if they are not here,
> just beak and no following force_page_cache_readahead ?

They are checked in force_page_cache_readahead.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>
To: gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>,
	Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, fadvise: don't return -EINVAL when filesystem has no optimization way
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 02:33:55 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FE16ED3.2090403@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FE16E50.9030304@cn.fujitsu.com>

(6/20/12 2:31 AM), Wanlong Gao wrote:
> On 06/16/2012 04:36 AM, kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
>>
>> Eric Wong reported his test suite was fail when /tmp is tmpfs.
>>
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/24/479
>>
>> Current,input check of POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED has two problems.
>>
>> 1) require a_ops->readpage.
>>    But in fact, force_page_cache_readahead() only require
>>    a target filesystem has either ->readpage or ->readpages.
>> 2) return -EINVAL when filesystem don't have ->readpage.
>>    But, posix says, it should be retrieved a hint. Thus fadvise()
>>    should return 0 if filesystem has no optimization way.
>>    Especially, userland application don't know a filesystem type
>>    of TMPDIR directory as Eric pointed out. Then, userland can't
>>    avoid this error. We shouldn't encourage to ignore syscall
>>    return value.
>>
>> Thus, this patch change a return value to 0 when filesytem don't
>> support readahead.
>>
>> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
>> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>> Cc: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
>> Tested-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
>> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>>  mm/fadvise.c |   18 +++++++-----------
>>  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/fadvise.c b/mm/fadvise.c
>> index 469491e..33e6baf 100644
>> --- a/mm/fadvise.c
>> +++ b/mm/fadvise.c
>> @@ -93,11 +93,6 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE(fadvise64_64)(int fd, loff_t offset, loff_t len, int advice)
>>  		spin_unlock(&file->f_lock);
>>  		break;
>>  	case POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED:
>> -		if (!mapping->a_ops->readpage) {
>> -			ret = -EINVAL;
>> -			break;
>> -		}
> 
> Why not check both readpage and readpages, if they are not here,
> just beak and no following force_page_cache_readahead ?

They are checked in force_page_cache_readahead.


  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-20  6:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-15 20:36 [PATCH] mm, fadvise: don't return -EINVAL when filesystem has no optimization way kosaki.motohiro
2012-06-15 20:36 ` kosaki.motohiro
2012-06-20  5:01 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-06-20  5:01   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-06-20  6:31 ` Wanlong Gao
2012-06-20  6:31   ` Wanlong Gao
2012-06-20  6:33   ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2012-06-20  6:33     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-06-20  6:37     ` Wanlong Gao
2012-06-20  6:37       ` Wanlong Gao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FE16ED3.2090403@gmail.com \
    --to=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhillf@gmail.com \
    --cc=gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=normalperson@yhbt.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.