All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>,
	linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] acpi: intel_idle : break dependency between modules
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2012 21:36:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FF0A6C5.5080509@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201206300027.05175.rjw@sisk.pl>

On 06/30/2012 12:27 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, June 29, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 06/28/2012 09:24 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Thursday, June 28, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>>> When the system is booted with some cpus offline, the idle
>>>> driver is not initialized. When a cpu is set online, the
>>>> acpi code call the intel idle init function. Unfortunately
>>>> this code introduce a dependency between intel_idle and acpi.
>>>>
>>>> This patch is intended to remove this dependency by using the
>>>> notifier of intel_idle. This patch has the benefit of
>>>> encapsulating the intel_idle driver and remove some exported
>>>> functions.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>>>
>>> This one looks good to me too.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
>>
>> Thanks for the review Rafael.
>>
>>> Len, are you going to take it?
>>
>> Rafael, Len,
>>
>> After the discussion [1], I put in place a tree at:
>>
>> ssh://git.linaro.org/srv/git.linaro.org/git/people/dlezcano/cpuidle-next.git
>> #cpuidle-next
>>
>> I proposed this tree to group the cpuidle modifications and prevent the
>> last minutes conflict when Len will apply them.
>>
>> I also included the tree into linux-next for wider testing.
> 
> I can't speak for Len, but I'm not sure he'll like this.

I sent the proposition a week ago and Len was Cc'ed. I guess he is very
busy but the problem we are facing is there are a lot of pending
modifications for cpuidle because of some new architecture (like the
big.LITTLE and tegra3). Colin's patchset is one of them.

> Anyway, you seem to have the same material as Len in that tree, won't there
> be any conflicts in linux-next?

At the first glance no, until he merge the patches we sent. As I already
said the purpose is to help to consolidate the patches sent for cpuidle
by acting as a proxy.

I hope that helps.

Thanks
  -- Daniel



-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: lenb@kernel.org, trenn@suse.de, srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] acpi: intel_idle : break dependency between modules
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2012 21:36:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FF0A6C5.5080509@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201206300027.05175.rjw@sisk.pl>

On 06/30/2012 12:27 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, June 29, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 06/28/2012 09:24 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Thursday, June 28, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>>> When the system is booted with some cpus offline, the idle
>>>> driver is not initialized. When a cpu is set online, the
>>>> acpi code call the intel idle init function. Unfortunately
>>>> this code introduce a dependency between intel_idle and acpi.
>>>>
>>>> This patch is intended to remove this dependency by using the
>>>> notifier of intel_idle. This patch has the benefit of
>>>> encapsulating the intel_idle driver and remove some exported
>>>> functions.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>>>
>>> This one looks good to me too.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
>>
>> Thanks for the review Rafael.
>>
>>> Len, are you going to take it?
>>
>> Rafael, Len,
>>
>> After the discussion [1], I put in place a tree at:
>>
>> ssh://git.linaro.org/srv/git.linaro.org/git/people/dlezcano/cpuidle-next.git
>> #cpuidle-next
>>
>> I proposed this tree to group the cpuidle modifications and prevent the
>> last minutes conflict when Len will apply them.
>>
>> I also included the tree into linux-next for wider testing.
> 
> I can't speak for Len, but I'm not sure he'll like this.

I sent the proposition a week ago and Len was Cc'ed. I guess he is very
busy but the problem we are facing is there are a lot of pending
modifications for cpuidle because of some new architecture (like the
big.LITTLE and tegra3). Colin's patchset is one of them.

> Anyway, you seem to have the same material as Len in that tree, won't there
> be any conflicts in linux-next?

At the first glance no, until he merge the patches we sent. As I already
said the purpose is to help to consolidate the patches sent for cpuidle
by acting as a proxy.

I hope that helps.

Thanks
  -- Daniel



-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog


  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-01 19:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-15 15:28 acpi_idle and max_cpus Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-17 20:18 ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-18 12:25   ` Deepthi Dharwar
2012-06-18 12:54     ` [linux-pm] " Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-19  6:54       ` Deepthi Dharwar
2012-06-19  7:03         ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-06-19  7:18           ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-19 15:30             ` Thomas Renninger
2012-06-25 11:25             ` [PATCH] acpi, cpuidle: Register with cpuidle even if cpu is onlined after boot (beyond maxcpus) Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-06-25 13:53               ` Thomas Renninger
2012-06-25 13:53                 ` Thomas Renninger
2012-06-25 16:03                 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-06-25 16:03                   ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-06-26  9:29                   ` Thomas Renninger
2012-06-26  9:41                     ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-26  9:41                       ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-26  9:58                       ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-06-26  9:58                         ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-06-26 10:42                         ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-26 10:42                           ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-26 11:01                           ` Thomas Renninger
2012-06-26 11:01                             ` Thomas Renninger
2012-06-27  9:07                             ` [PATCH] acpi: intel_idle : break dependency between modules Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-27  9:07                               ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-27 13:06                               ` Thomas Renninger
2012-06-27 13:06                                 ` Thomas Renninger
     [not found]                                 ` <201206271506.29034.trenn-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
2012-06-28  8:03                                   ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-28  8:03                                     ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-28  8:46                                 ` [PATCH v2] " Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-28  8:46                                   ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-28 11:24                                   ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-06-28 11:27                                     ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-28 11:27                                       ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-28 11:56                                       ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-06-28 11:56                                         ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-06-28 19:24                                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-06-29  8:39                                     ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-29  8:39                                       ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-29 22:27                                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-06-29 22:27                                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-01 19:36                                         ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2012-07-01 19:36                                           ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-27 16:16                               ` [PATCH] " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-06-27 16:16                                 ` [linux-pm] " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-06-28  7:34                                 ` Thomas Renninger
2012-06-28 11:23                                   ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-06-28 11:23                                     ` [linux-pm] " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-06-26 11:07                           ` [PATCH] acpi, cpuidle: Register with cpuidle even if cpu is onlined after boot (beyond maxcpus) Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-06-26 11:07                             ` [linux-pm] " Srivatsa S. Bhat

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FF0A6C5.5080509@linaro.org \
    --to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ccross@android.com \
    --cc=linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.