Re: [PATCH 4/6] ARM: tegra: Add clk_tegra structure and helper functions

[Stephen Warren <swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>]

On 07/02/2012 06:09 PM, Turquette, Mike wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 1:34 AM, Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> On Thursday 28 June 2012 11:58 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
>>> We had some discussions in the past on your clock reset and external
>>> line request operations which you've had to put into struct clk_tegra.
>>>
>>> Do you need to expose those ops to code in drivers/*?  I consider that a
>>> reasonable litmus test to start considering if something should be moved
>>> into the generic clk.h api.
>>
>>
>> Yes, we need these ops in drivers. Peter has sent a patch proposing to move
>> these ops to generic clk.
>>
>> In addition, we also need mechanism/ops to change rate and parent from
>> clk_ops implementation. There was some discussion but I do not know the
>> latest status.
>>
> 
> Hi Prashant,
> 
> OK, that is good to know.  I haven't forgotten about this topic.  I'm
> still trying to think of the best way to expose less-common operations
> to drivers...
> 
> Based on Stephen's feedback in patch 0 I'll be waiting for another
> version of this series before taking into clk-next.

Oh, does this series depend on stuff in clk-next? I was intending to
take it through the Tegra tree, since it definitely depends on (in
complex ways through context if nothing else due to to large
split/rename patches) a bunch of commits in Tegra's for-3.6/common-clk
branch.