From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: liu ping fan <qemulist@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpu: smp_wmb before lauching cpus.
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 12:16:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FF56988.8060207@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJnKYQnfaPHYPQViJm0wqriWz1UoxcR3CLCY1vK_5vgY0LyFTw@mail.gmail.com>
On 2012-07-05 12:10, liu ping fan wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de> wrote:
>> On 2012-07-05 04:18, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
>>> Vcpu state must be set completely before receiving INIT-IPI,SIPI
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Liu Ping Fan <pingfank@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>> kvm.h | 1 +
>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/kvm.h b/kvm.h
>>> index 9c7b0ea..5b3c228 100644
>>> --- a/kvm.h
>>> +++ b/kvm.h
>>> @@ -198,6 +198,7 @@ static inline void cpu_synchronize_post_init(CPUArchState *env)
>>> {
>>> if (kvm_enabled()) {
>>> kvm_cpu_synchronize_post_init(env);
>>> + smp_wmb();
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>
>> In theory, there should be no vcpu kick-off after this without some
>> locking operations involved that imply barriers. Did you see real
>
> Yeah, but what if it is non-x86?
The locking I'm referring to is arch independent.
>> inconsistencies without this explicit one?
Again: Did you see real issues or is this based on static analysis?
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: liu ping fan <qemulist@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] cpu: smp_wmb before lauching cpus.
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 12:16:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FF56988.8060207@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJnKYQnfaPHYPQViJm0wqriWz1UoxcR3CLCY1vK_5vgY0LyFTw@mail.gmail.com>
On 2012-07-05 12:10, liu ping fan wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de> wrote:
>> On 2012-07-05 04:18, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
>>> Vcpu state must be set completely before receiving INIT-IPI,SIPI
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Liu Ping Fan <pingfank@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>> kvm.h | 1 +
>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/kvm.h b/kvm.h
>>> index 9c7b0ea..5b3c228 100644
>>> --- a/kvm.h
>>> +++ b/kvm.h
>>> @@ -198,6 +198,7 @@ static inline void cpu_synchronize_post_init(CPUArchState *env)
>>> {
>>> if (kvm_enabled()) {
>>> kvm_cpu_synchronize_post_init(env);
>>> + smp_wmb();
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>
>> In theory, there should be no vcpu kick-off after this without some
>> locking operations involved that imply barriers. Did you see real
>
> Yeah, but what if it is non-x86?
The locking I'm referring to is arch independent.
>> inconsistencies without this explicit one?
Again: Did you see real issues or is this based on static analysis?
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-05 10:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-05 2:18 [PATCH] cpu: smp_wmb before lauching cpus Liu Ping Fan
2012-07-05 2:18 ` [Qemu-devel] " Liu Ping Fan
2012-07-05 6:46 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-07-05 6:46 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2012-07-05 10:10 ` liu ping fan
2012-07-05 10:10 ` [Qemu-devel] " liu ping fan
2012-07-05 10:16 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2012-07-05 10:16 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-07-05 11:02 ` liu ping fan
2012-07-05 11:02 ` [Qemu-devel] " liu ping fan
2012-07-05 11:58 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-07-05 11:58 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2012-07-06 7:46 ` liu ping fan
2012-07-06 7:46 ` [Qemu-devel] " liu ping fan
2012-07-06 8:14 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-07-06 8:14 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FF56988.8060207@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemulist@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.