All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "zumeng.chen" <zchen@windriver.com>
To: "Bedia, Vaibhav" <vaibhav.bedia@ti.com>
Cc: Zumeng Chen <zumeng.chen@windriver.com>,
	"hubhrajyoti@ti.com" <hubhrajyoti@ti.com>,
	"wim@iguana.be" <wim@iguana.be>,
	"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Watchdog: OMAP3: fix wrong boot status from wdt reboot
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 23:03:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FF5ACA9.3090903@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B5906170F1614E41A8A28DE3B8D121433EAF8359@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>

On 2012年07月05日 21:05, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 21:24:01, Zumeng Chen wrote:
>> Does the following fix make sense?
>>
>> WDIOC_GETBOOTSTATUS always return 0 even if the machine
>> comes from omap-wdt reboot. Because WKUP_MOD is not right
>> for OMAP3, so give the right addr 0xA00 of PRM_RSTST for
>> get_reset_sources, which inputs the signal from omap-wdt
>> reboot, and return 1 when coming from omap-wdt reboot for
>> WDIOC_GETBOOTSTATUS.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zumeng Chen<zumeng.chen@windriver.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm.c  |    4 +++-
>>   drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c |    3 +++
>>   drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.h |    3 +++
>>   3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm.c
>> index 480f40a..43f3feb 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm.c
>> @@ -49,8 +49,10 @@ void __iomem *prcm_mpu_base;
>>   u32 omap_prcm_get_reset_sources(void)
>>   {
>>   	/* XXX This presumably needs modification for 34XX */
>> -	if (cpu_is_omap24xx() || cpu_is_omap34xx())
>> +	if (cpu_is_omap24xx())
>>   		return omap2_prm_read_mod_reg(WKUP_MOD, OMAP2_RM_RSTST)&  0x7f;
>> +	if (cpu_is_omap34xx())
>> +		return omap2_prm_read_mod_reg(0xA00, OMAP2_RM_RSTST)&  0x7f;
>>   	if (cpu_is_omap44xx())
>>   		return omap2_prm_read_mod_reg(WKUP_MOD, OMAP4_RM_RSTST)&  0x7f;
> Instead of adding more cpu_is_* checks maybe you could switch to a
> function pointers based approach here?
I don't see any more checks VS before like ( cpu_is_omap24xx() || 
cpu_is_omap34xx())

Actually what we want is just to read a register with different offset
responding to the different SOC.
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c
>> index 8285d65..ea57078 100644
>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c
>> @@ -234,6 +234,9 @@ static long omap_wdt_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
>>   		if (cpu_is_omap24xx())
>>   			return put_user(omap_prcm_get_reset_sources(),
>>   					(int __user *)arg);
>> +		if (cpu_is_omap34xx())
>> +			return put_user(omap_prcm_get_reset_sources()&  0x10>>
>> +				OMAP3_PRM_RSTST_BIT, (int __user *)arg);
>>   		return put_user(0, (int __user *)arg);
> Usage of PRCM bit masks in the driver looks wrong. Why not
Maybe the not proper definition causes "looks wrong".
It should be MPU_WD_RST_BIT, so you see, it is about
watchdog bit.

Anyway, I'll try to send V2 patch with Hubhrajyoti's and your
comments

Regards,
Zumeng
> introduce an API like omap_prcm_check_reset_reason() which
> returns true or false based on the reset reason being checked?
>
> In case of WDT, the driver can then pass the right flag to
> userspace.
>
> Regards,
> Vaibhav B.
>
>>   	case WDIOC_KEEPALIVE:
>>   		pm_runtime_get_sync(wdev->dev);
>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.h b/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.h
>> index 09b774c..d8d5daa 100644
>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.h
>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.h
>> @@ -40,6 +40,9 @@
>>   #define OMAP_WATCHDOG_WPS		(0x34)
>>   #define OMAP_WATCHDOG_SPR		(0x48)
>>
>> +/* PRM_RSTST MPU_WD_RST bit */
>> +#define OMAP3_PRM_RSTST_BIT		4
>> +
>>   /* Using the prescaler, the OMAP watchdog could go for many
>>    * months before firing.  These limits work without scaling,
>>    * with the 60 second default assumed by most tools and docs.
>> -- 
>> 1.7.5.4
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "zumeng.chen" <zchen@windriver.com>
To: "Bedia, Vaibhav" <vaibhav.bedia@ti.com>
Cc: Zumeng Chen <zumeng.chen@windriver.com>,
	"hubhrajyoti@ti.com" <hubhrajyoti@ti.com>,
	"wim@iguana.be" <wim@iguana.be>,
	"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Watchdog: OMAP3: fix wrong boot status from wdt reboot
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 23:03:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FF5ACA9.3090903@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B5906170F1614E41A8A28DE3B8D121433EAF8359@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>

On 2012年07月05日 21:05, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 21:24:01, Zumeng Chen wrote:
>> Does the following fix make sense?
>>
>> WDIOC_GETBOOTSTATUS always return 0 even if the machine
>> comes from omap-wdt reboot. Because WKUP_MOD is not right
>> for OMAP3, so give the right addr 0xA00 of PRM_RSTST for
>> get_reset_sources, which inputs the signal from omap-wdt
>> reboot, and return 1 when coming from omap-wdt reboot for
>> WDIOC_GETBOOTSTATUS.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zumeng Chen<zumeng.chen@windriver.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm.c  |    4 +++-
>>   drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c |    3 +++
>>   drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.h |    3 +++
>>   3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm.c
>> index 480f40a..43f3feb 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm.c
>> @@ -49,8 +49,10 @@ void __iomem *prcm_mpu_base;
>>   u32 omap_prcm_get_reset_sources(void)
>>   {
>>   	/* XXX This presumably needs modification for 34XX */
>> -	if (cpu_is_omap24xx() || cpu_is_omap34xx())
>> +	if (cpu_is_omap24xx())
>>   		return omap2_prm_read_mod_reg(WKUP_MOD, OMAP2_RM_RSTST)&  0x7f;
>> +	if (cpu_is_omap34xx())
>> +		return omap2_prm_read_mod_reg(0xA00, OMAP2_RM_RSTST)&  0x7f;
>>   	if (cpu_is_omap44xx())
>>   		return omap2_prm_read_mod_reg(WKUP_MOD, OMAP4_RM_RSTST)&  0x7f;
> Instead of adding more cpu_is_* checks maybe you could switch to a
> function pointers based approach here?
I don't see any more checks VS before like ( cpu_is_omap24xx() || 
cpu_is_omap34xx())

Actually what we want is just to read a register with different offset
responding to the different SOC.
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c
>> index 8285d65..ea57078 100644
>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c
>> @@ -234,6 +234,9 @@ static long omap_wdt_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
>>   		if (cpu_is_omap24xx())
>>   			return put_user(omap_prcm_get_reset_sources(),
>>   					(int __user *)arg);
>> +		if (cpu_is_omap34xx())
>> +			return put_user(omap_prcm_get_reset_sources()&  0x10>>
>> +				OMAP3_PRM_RSTST_BIT, (int __user *)arg);
>>   		return put_user(0, (int __user *)arg);
> Usage of PRCM bit masks in the driver looks wrong. Why not
Maybe the not proper definition causes "looks wrong".
It should be MPU_WD_RST_BIT, so you see, it is about
watchdog bit.

Anyway, I'll try to send V2 patch with Hubhrajyoti's and your
comments

Regards,
Zumeng
> introduce an API like omap_prcm_check_reset_reason() which
> returns true or false based on the reset reason being checked?
>
> In case of WDT, the driver can then pass the right flag to
> userspace.
>
> Regards,
> Vaibhav B.
>
>>   	case WDIOC_KEEPALIVE:
>>   		pm_runtime_get_sync(wdev->dev);
>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.h b/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.h
>> index 09b774c..d8d5daa 100644
>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.h
>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.h
>> @@ -40,6 +40,9 @@
>>   #define OMAP_WATCHDOG_WPS		(0x34)
>>   #define OMAP_WATCHDOG_SPR		(0x48)
>>
>> +/* PRM_RSTST MPU_WD_RST bit */
>> +#define OMAP3_PRM_RSTST_BIT		4
>> +
>>   /* Using the prescaler, the OMAP watchdog could go for many
>>    * months before firing.  These limits work without scaling,
>>    * with the 60 second default assumed by most tools and docs.
>> -- 
>> 1.7.5.4
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: zchen@windriver.com (zumeng.chen)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Watchdog: OMAP3: fix wrong boot status from wdt reboot
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 23:03:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FF5ACA9.3090903@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B5906170F1614E41A8A28DE3B8D121433EAF8359@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>

On 2012?07?05? 21:05, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 21:24:01, Zumeng Chen wrote:
>> Does the following fix make sense?
>>
>> WDIOC_GETBOOTSTATUS always return 0 even if the machine
>> comes from omap-wdt reboot. Because WKUP_MOD is not right
>> for OMAP3, so give the right addr 0xA00 of PRM_RSTST for
>> get_reset_sources, which inputs the signal from omap-wdt
>> reboot, and return 1 when coming from omap-wdt reboot for
>> WDIOC_GETBOOTSTATUS.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zumeng Chen<zumeng.chen@windriver.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm.c  |    4 +++-
>>   drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c |    3 +++
>>   drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.h |    3 +++
>>   3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm.c
>> index 480f40a..43f3feb 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm.c
>> @@ -49,8 +49,10 @@ void __iomem *prcm_mpu_base;
>>   u32 omap_prcm_get_reset_sources(void)
>>   {
>>   	/* XXX This presumably needs modification for 34XX */
>> -	if (cpu_is_omap24xx() || cpu_is_omap34xx())
>> +	if (cpu_is_omap24xx())
>>   		return omap2_prm_read_mod_reg(WKUP_MOD, OMAP2_RM_RSTST)&  0x7f;
>> +	if (cpu_is_omap34xx())
>> +		return omap2_prm_read_mod_reg(0xA00, OMAP2_RM_RSTST)&  0x7f;
>>   	if (cpu_is_omap44xx())
>>   		return omap2_prm_read_mod_reg(WKUP_MOD, OMAP4_RM_RSTST)&  0x7f;
> Instead of adding more cpu_is_* checks maybe you could switch to a
> function pointers based approach here?
I don't see any more checks VS before like ( cpu_is_omap24xx() || 
cpu_is_omap34xx())

Actually what we want is just to read a register with different offset
responding to the different SOC.
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c
>> index 8285d65..ea57078 100644
>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c
>> @@ -234,6 +234,9 @@ static long omap_wdt_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
>>   		if (cpu_is_omap24xx())
>>   			return put_user(omap_prcm_get_reset_sources(),
>>   					(int __user *)arg);
>> +		if (cpu_is_omap34xx())
>> +			return put_user(omap_prcm_get_reset_sources()&  0x10>>
>> +				OMAP3_PRM_RSTST_BIT, (int __user *)arg);
>>   		return put_user(0, (int __user *)arg);
> Usage of PRCM bit masks in the driver looks wrong. Why not
Maybe the not proper definition causes "looks wrong".
It should be MPU_WD_RST_BIT, so you see, it is about
watchdog bit.

Anyway, I'll try to send V2 patch with Hubhrajyoti's and your
comments

Regards,
Zumeng
> introduce an API like omap_prcm_check_reset_reason() which
> returns true or false based on the reset reason being checked?
>
> In case of WDT, the driver can then pass the right flag to
> userspace.
>
> Regards,
> Vaibhav B.
>
>>   	case WDIOC_KEEPALIVE:
>>   		pm_runtime_get_sync(wdev->dev);
>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.h b/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.h
>> index 09b774c..d8d5daa 100644
>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.h
>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.h
>> @@ -40,6 +40,9 @@
>>   #define OMAP_WATCHDOG_WPS		(0x34)
>>   #define OMAP_WATCHDOG_SPR		(0x48)
>>
>> +/* PRM_RSTST MPU_WD_RST bit */
>> +#define OMAP3_PRM_RSTST_BIT		4
>> +
>>   /* Using the prescaler, the OMAP watchdog could go for many
>>    * months before firing.  These limits work without scaling,
>>    * with the 60 second default assumed by most tools and docs.
>> -- 
>> 1.7.5.4
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-05 15:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-04 15:54 [PATCH 1/1] Watchdog: OMAP3: fix wrong boot status from wdt reboot Zumeng Chen
2012-07-04 15:54 ` Zumeng Chen
2012-07-04 15:54 ` Zumeng Chen
2012-07-04 15:57 ` zumeng.chen
2012-07-04 15:57   ` zumeng.chen
2012-07-04 15:57   ` zumeng.chen
2012-07-05  5:39   ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-07-05  5:39     ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-07-05  5:39     ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-07-05  6:00     ` Zumeng Chen
2012-07-05  6:00       ` Zumeng Chen
2012-07-05  6:00       ` Zumeng Chen
2012-07-05 13:05 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2012-07-05 13:05   ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2012-07-05 13:05   ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2012-07-05 15:03   ` zumeng.chen [this message]
2012-07-05 15:03     ` zumeng.chen
2012-07-05 15:03     ` zumeng.chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FF5ACA9.3090903@windriver.com \
    --to=zchen@windriver.com \
    --cc=hubhrajyoti@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vaibhav.bedia@ti.com \
    --cc=wim@iguana.be \
    --cc=zumeng.chen@windriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.