* DT support for Davinci ASoC platform @ 2012-07-04 12:48 ` Hebbar, Gururaja 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Hebbar, Gururaja @ 2012-07-04 12:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, alsa-user@lists.sourceforge.net, davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com Cc: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, Nori, Sekhar, Girdwood, Liam, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Rajashekhara, Sudhakar All, Are there any plans or work going on for providing Device Tree Support for Davinci ASoC? I am planning to add DT support for TI AM335x (McASP) and I don't want to do duplicate task. Regards Gururaja ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* DT support for Davinci ASoC platform @ 2012-07-04 12:48 ` Hebbar, Gururaja 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Hebbar, Gururaja @ 2012-07-04 12:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel All, Are there any plans or work going on for providing Device Tree Support for Davinci ASoC? I am planning to add DT support for TI AM335x (McASP) and I don't want to do duplicate task. Regards Gururaja ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: DT support for Davinci ASoC platform 2012-07-04 12:48 ` Hebbar, Gururaja @ 2012-07-05 10:58 ` Daniel Mack -1 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Daniel Mack @ 2012-07-05 10:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hebbar, Gururaja Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Rajashekhara, Sudhakar, broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, Nori, Sekhar, davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com, alsa-user@lists.sourceforge.net, Girdwood, Liam, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Hi Gururaja, On 04.07.2012 14:48, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote: > All, > > Are there any plans or work going on for providing Device Tree Support for Davinci > ASoC? > > I am planning to add DT support for TI AM335x (McASP) and I don't want to do duplicate > task. That's good to know. But isn't there a dependency on the EDMA engine? Is that part ported yet? Daniel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [alsa-devel] DT support for Davinci ASoC platform @ 2012-07-05 10:58 ` Daniel Mack 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Daniel Mack @ 2012-07-05 10:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Hi Gururaja, On 04.07.2012 14:48, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote: > All, > > Are there any plans or work going on for providing Device Tree Support for Davinci > ASoC? > > I am planning to add DT support for TI AM335x (McASP) and I don't want to do duplicate > task. That's good to know. But isn't there a dependency on the EDMA engine? Is that part ported yet? Daniel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: DT support for Davinci ASoC platform 2012-07-05 10:58 ` [alsa-devel] " Daniel Mack @ 2012-07-05 15:36 ` Arnd Bergmann -1 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2012-07-05 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Rajashekhara, Sudhakar, broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, Nori, Sekhar, davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com, Hebbar, Gururaja, alsa-user@lists.sourceforge.net, Daniel Mack, Girdwood, Liam On Thursday 05 July 2012, Daniel Mack wrote: > On 04.07.2012 14:48, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote: > > All, > > > > Are there any plans or work going on for providing Device Tree Support for Davinci > > ASoC? > > > > I am planning to add DT support for TI AM335x (McASP) and I don't want to do duplicate > > task. > > That's good to know. But isn't there a dependency on the EDMA engine? Is > that part ported yet? None of the dma engines are ported yet, because the generic binding for dma engines is still under debate. So far, all DMA channels are described using auxdata on platforms that use DT, with the exception of exynos, but that one will have to change once we have the common code. Arnd ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [alsa-devel] DT support for Davinci ASoC platform @ 2012-07-05 15:36 ` Arnd Bergmann 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2012-07-05 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Thursday 05 July 2012, Daniel Mack wrote: > On 04.07.2012 14:48, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote: > > All, > > > > Are there any plans or work going on for providing Device Tree Support for Davinci > > ASoC? > > > > I am planning to add DT support for TI AM335x (McASP) and I don't want to do duplicate > > task. > > That's good to know. But isn't there a dependency on the EDMA engine? Is > that part ported yet? None of the dma engines are ported yet, because the generic binding for dma engines is still under debate. So far, all DMA channels are described using auxdata on platforms that use DT, with the exception of exynos, but that one will have to change once we have the common code. Arnd ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: DT support for Davinci ASoC platform 2012-07-05 15:36 ` [alsa-devel] " Arnd Bergmann @ 2012-07-05 16:05 ` Daniel Mack -1 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Daniel Mack @ 2012-07-05 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Rajashekhara, Sudhakar, broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, Nori, Sekhar, davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com, Hebbar, Gururaja, alsa-user@lists.sourceforge.net, Girdwood, Liam, linux-arm-kernel On 05.07.2012 17:36, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 05 July 2012, Daniel Mack wrote: >> On 04.07.2012 14:48, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote: >>> All, >>> >>> Are there any plans or work going on for providing Device Tree Support for Davinci >>> ASoC? >>> >>> I am planning to add DT support for TI AM335x (McASP) and I don't want to do duplicate >>> task. >> >> That's good to know. But isn't there a dependency on the EDMA engine? Is >> that part ported yet? > > None of the dma engines are ported yet, because the generic binding for dma > engines is still under debate. So far, all DMA channels are described using > auxdata on platforms that use DT, with the exception of exynos, but that one > will have to change once we have the common code. You're talking about the DT bindings here, right? But the code itself is also only present in TI's BSP kernel sources, and not in mainline. Daniel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [alsa-devel] DT support for Davinci ASoC platform @ 2012-07-05 16:05 ` Daniel Mack 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Daniel Mack @ 2012-07-05 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On 05.07.2012 17:36, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 05 July 2012, Daniel Mack wrote: >> On 04.07.2012 14:48, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote: >>> All, >>> >>> Are there any plans or work going on for providing Device Tree Support for Davinci >>> ASoC? >>> >>> I am planning to add DT support for TI AM335x (McASP) and I don't want to do duplicate >>> task. >> >> That's good to know. But isn't there a dependency on the EDMA engine? Is >> that part ported yet? > > None of the dma engines are ported yet, because the generic binding for dma > engines is still under debate. So far, all DMA channels are described using > auxdata on platforms that use DT, with the exception of exynos, but that one > will have to change once we have the common code. You're talking about the DT bindings here, right? But the code itself is also only present in TI's BSP kernel sources, and not in mainline. Daniel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <4FF5BB34.9070002-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [alsa-devel] DT support for Davinci ASoC platform 2012-07-05 16:05 ` [alsa-devel] " Daniel Mack @ 2012-07-06 13:12 ` Sekhar Nori -1 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Sekhar Nori @ 2012-07-06 13:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daniel Mack Cc: alsa-devel-K7yf7f+aM1XWsZ/bQMPhNw@public.gmane.org, Arnd Bergmann, broonie-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org, davinci-linux-open-source-VycZQUHpC/PFrsHnngEfi1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org, alsa-user-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, Girdwood, Liam, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r Hi Daniel, On 7/5/2012 9:35 PM, Daniel Mack wrote: > On 05.07.2012 17:36, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Thursday 05 July 2012, Daniel Mack wrote: >>> On 04.07.2012 14:48, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote: >>>> All, >>>> >>>> Are there any plans or work going on for providing Device Tree Support for Davinci >>>> ASoC? >>>> >>>> I am planning to add DT support for TI AM335x (McASP) and I don't want to do duplicate >>>> task. >>> >>> That's good to know. But isn't there a dependency on the EDMA engine? Is >>> that part ported yet? >> >> None of the dma engines are ported yet, because the generic binding for dma >> engines is still under debate. So far, all DMA channels are described using >> auxdata on platforms that use DT, with the exception of exynos, but that one >> will have to change once we have the common code. > > You're talking about the DT bindings here, right? But the code itself is > also only present in TI's BSP kernel sources, and not in mainline. AM335x uses TI EDMA which is present in mainline under mach-davinci. Matt Porter from TI is working on moving this to DMA engine. Once that's done the driver should be usable on AM335x too. Have a look at the wiki page Vaibhav posted under the thread "Current state of AM33xx patches" Thanks, Sekhar ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [alsa-devel] DT support for Davinci ASoC platform @ 2012-07-06 13:12 ` Sekhar Nori 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Sekhar Nori @ 2012-07-06 13:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Hi Daniel, On 7/5/2012 9:35 PM, Daniel Mack wrote: > On 05.07.2012 17:36, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Thursday 05 July 2012, Daniel Mack wrote: >>> On 04.07.2012 14:48, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote: >>>> All, >>>> >>>> Are there any plans or work going on for providing Device Tree Support for Davinci >>>> ASoC? >>>> >>>> I am planning to add DT support for TI AM335x (McASP) and I don't want to do duplicate >>>> task. >>> >>> That's good to know. But isn't there a dependency on the EDMA engine? Is >>> that part ported yet? >> >> None of the dma engines are ported yet, because the generic binding for dma >> engines is still under debate. So far, all DMA channels are described using >> auxdata on platforms that use DT, with the exception of exynos, but that one >> will have to change once we have the common code. > > You're talking about the DT bindings here, right? But the code itself is > also only present in TI's BSP kernel sources, and not in mainline. AM335x uses TI EDMA which is present in mainline under mach-davinci. Matt Porter from TI is working on moving this to DMA engine. Once that's done the driver should be usable on AM335x too. Have a look at the wiki page Vaibhav posted under the thread "Current state of AM33xx patches" Thanks, Sekhar ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: DT support for Davinci ASoC platform 2012-07-05 16:05 ` [alsa-devel] " Daniel Mack @ 2012-07-06 15:01 ` Arnd Bergmann -1 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2012-07-06 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daniel Mack Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Rajashekhara, Sudhakar, broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, Nori, Sekhar, davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com, Hebbar, Gururaja, alsa-user@lists.sourceforge.net, Girdwood, Liam, linux-arm-kernel On Thursday 05 July 2012, Daniel Mack wrote: > > > > None of the dma engines are ported yet, because the generic binding for dma > > engines is still under debate. So far, all DMA channels are described using > > auxdata on platforms that use DT, with the exception of exynos, but that one > > will have to change once we have the common code. > > You're talking about the DT bindings here, right? But the code itself is > also only present in TI's BSP kernel sources, and not in mainline. Right, I was misreading the question, sorry for the noise. Arnd ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [alsa-devel] DT support for Davinci ASoC platform @ 2012-07-06 15:01 ` Arnd Bergmann 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2012-07-06 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Thursday 05 July 2012, Daniel Mack wrote: > > > > None of the dma engines are ported yet, because the generic binding for dma > > engines is still under debate. So far, all DMA channels are described using > > auxdata on platforms that use DT, with the exception of exynos, but that one > > will have to change once we have the common code. > > You're talking about the DT bindings here, right? But the code itself is > also only present in TI's BSP kernel sources, and not in mainline. Right, I was misreading the question, sorry for the noise. Arnd ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: DT support for Davinci ASoC platform 2012-07-05 10:58 ` [alsa-devel] " Daniel Mack @ 2012-08-02 20:32 ` Daniel Mack -1 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Daniel Mack @ 2012-08-02 20:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hebbar, Gururaja Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Rajashekhara, Sudhakar, broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, Nori, Sekhar, davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com, alsa-user@lists.sourceforge.net, Girdwood, Liam, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On 05.07.2012 12:58, Daniel Mack wrote: > Hi Gururaja, > > On 04.07.2012 14:48, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote: >> All, >> >> Are there any plans or work going on for providing Device Tree Support for Davinci >> ASoC? >> >> I am planning to add DT support for TI AM335x (McASP) and I don't want to do duplicate >> task. > > That's good to know. But isn't there a dependency on the EDMA engine? Is > that part ported yet? May I ask whether you made any progress on that yet? Thanks, Daniel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [alsa-devel] DT support for Davinci ASoC platform @ 2012-08-02 20:32 ` Daniel Mack 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Daniel Mack @ 2012-08-02 20:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On 05.07.2012 12:58, Daniel Mack wrote: > Hi Gururaja, > > On 04.07.2012 14:48, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote: >> All, >> >> Are there any plans or work going on for providing Device Tree Support for Davinci >> ASoC? >> >> I am planning to add DT support for TI AM335x (McASP) and I don't want to do duplicate >> task. > > That's good to know. But isn't there a dependency on the EDMA engine? Is > that part ported yet? May I ask whether you made any progress on that yet? Thanks, Daniel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [alsa-devel] DT support for Davinci ASoC platform 2012-08-02 20:32 ` [alsa-devel] " Daniel Mack @ 2012-08-03 9:09 ` Sekhar Nori -1 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Sekhar Nori @ 2012-08-03 9:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daniel Mack Cc: Porter, Matt, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Rajashekhara, Sudhakar, broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com, Hebbar, Gururaja, alsa-user@lists.sourceforge.net, Girdwood, Liam, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Hi Daniel, On 8/3/2012 2:02 AM, Daniel Mack wrote: > On 05.07.2012 12:58, Daniel Mack wrote: >> Hi Gururaja, >> >> On 04.07.2012 14:48, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote: >>> All, >>> >>> Are there any plans or work going on for providing Device Tree Support for Davinci >>> ASoC? >>> >>> I am planning to add DT support for TI AM335x (McASP) and I don't want to do duplicate >>> task. >> >> That's good to know. But isn't there a dependency on the EDMA engine? Is >> that part ported yet? > > May I ask whether you made any progress on that yet? Matt Porter from TI is working on DMA engine migration. This would still be some time away since there is a bunch of work involved here. To make progress on Audio DT conversion Gururaja is doing an up port of AM335x EDMA support from TI release to mainline kernel. If you are interested in it, he can probably share that with you once he posts his DT patches. Thanks, Sekhar ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [alsa-devel] DT support for Davinci ASoC platform @ 2012-08-03 9:09 ` Sekhar Nori 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Sekhar Nori @ 2012-08-03 9:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Hi Daniel, On 8/3/2012 2:02 AM, Daniel Mack wrote: > On 05.07.2012 12:58, Daniel Mack wrote: >> Hi Gururaja, >> >> On 04.07.2012 14:48, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote: >>> All, >>> >>> Are there any plans or work going on for providing Device Tree Support for Davinci >>> ASoC? >>> >>> I am planning to add DT support for TI AM335x (McASP) and I don't want to do duplicate >>> task. >> >> That's good to know. But isn't there a dependency on the EDMA engine? Is >> that part ported yet? > > May I ask whether you made any progress on that yet? Matt Porter from TI is working on DMA engine migration. This would still be some time away since there is a bunch of work involved here. To make progress on Audio DT conversion Gururaja is doing an up port of AM335x EDMA support from TI release to mainline kernel. If you are interested in it, he can probably share that with you once he posts his DT patches. Thanks, Sekhar ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: DT support for Davinci ASoC platform 2012-08-03 9:09 ` Sekhar Nori @ 2012-08-08 13:36 ` Daniel Mack -1 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Daniel Mack @ 2012-08-08 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sekhar Nori Cc: Porter, Matt, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Rajashekhara, Sudhakar, broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com, Hebbar, Gururaja, alsa-user@lists.sourceforge.net, Girdwood, Liam, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Hi Serkar, On 03.08.2012 11:09, Sekhar Nori wrote: > On 8/3/2012 2:02 AM, Daniel Mack wrote: >> On 05.07.2012 12:58, Daniel Mack wrote: >>> Hi Gururaja, >>> >>> On 04.07.2012 14:48, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote: >>>> All, >>>> >>>> Are there any plans or work going on for providing Device Tree Support for Davinci >>>> ASoC? >>>> >>>> I am planning to add DT support for TI AM335x (McASP) and I don't want to do duplicate >>>> task. >>> >>> That's good to know. But isn't there a dependency on the EDMA engine? Is >>> that part ported yet? >> >> May I ask whether you made any progress on that yet? > > Matt Porter from TI is working on DMA engine migration. This would still > be some time away since there is a bunch of work involved here. > > To make progress on Audio DT conversion Gururaja is doing an up port of > AM335x EDMA support from TI release to mainline kernel. If you are > interested in it, he can probably share that with you once he posts his > DT patches. As the DMA engine is also a requirement for the MMC controller, I would be interested in helping, in case help is required. Is there any repository with code that I can have a look at? Thanks, Daniel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [alsa-devel] DT support for Davinci ASoC platform @ 2012-08-08 13:36 ` Daniel Mack 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Daniel Mack @ 2012-08-08 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Hi Serkar, On 03.08.2012 11:09, Sekhar Nori wrote: > On 8/3/2012 2:02 AM, Daniel Mack wrote: >> On 05.07.2012 12:58, Daniel Mack wrote: >>> Hi Gururaja, >>> >>> On 04.07.2012 14:48, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote: >>>> All, >>>> >>>> Are there any plans or work going on for providing Device Tree Support for Davinci >>>> ASoC? >>>> >>>> I am planning to add DT support for TI AM335x (McASP) and I don't want to do duplicate >>>> task. >>> >>> That's good to know. But isn't there a dependency on the EDMA engine? Is >>> that part ported yet? >> >> May I ask whether you made any progress on that yet? > > Matt Porter from TI is working on DMA engine migration. This would still > be some time away since there is a bunch of work involved here. > > To make progress on Audio DT conversion Gururaja is doing an up port of > AM335x EDMA support from TI release to mainline kernel. If you are > interested in it, he can probably share that with you once he posts his > DT patches. As the DMA engine is also a requirement for the MMC controller, I would be interested in helping, in case help is required. Is there any repository with code that I can have a look at? Thanks, Daniel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [alsa-devel] DT support for Davinci ASoC platform 2012-08-08 13:36 ` [alsa-devel] " Daniel Mack @ 2012-08-08 14:48 ` Porter, Matt -1 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Porter, Matt @ 2012-08-08 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daniel Mack Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Rajashekhara, Sudhakar, broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, Nori, Sekhar, davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com, Hebbar, Gururaja, alsa-user@lists.sourceforge.net, Girdwood, Liam, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Aug 8, 2012, at 9:36 AM, Daniel Mack wrote: > Hi Serkar, > > On 03.08.2012 11:09, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> On 8/3/2012 2:02 AM, Daniel Mack wrote: >>> On 05.07.2012 12:58, Daniel Mack wrote: >>>> Hi Gururaja, >>>> >>>> On 04.07.2012 14:48, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote: >>>>> All, >>>>> >>>>> Are there any plans or work going on for providing Device Tree Support for Davinci >>>>> ASoC? >>>>> >>>>> I am planning to add DT support for TI AM335x (McASP) and I don't want to do duplicate >>>>> task. >>>> >>>> That's good to know. But isn't there a dependency on the EDMA engine? Is >>>> that part ported yet? >>> >>> May I ask whether you made any progress on that yet? >> >> Matt Porter from TI is working on DMA engine migration. This would still >> be some time away since there is a bunch of work involved here. >> >> To make progress on Audio DT conversion Gururaja is doing an up port of >> AM335x EDMA support from TI release to mainline kernel. If you are >> interested in it, he can probably share that with you once he posts his >> DT patches. > > As the DMA engine is also a requirement for the MMC controller, I would > be interested in helping, in case help is required. Is there any > repository with code that I can have a look at? I'm just getting to the point now where I *almost* have something to push to my github repo and post. It'll be Davinci-specific to start since it's a wrapper around mach-davinci/dma.c and includes only memcpy and SG transfer type support initially...plus conversions of davinci spi/mmc drivers. There'll be a bit of work to get the omap-dma.c-dependent channel filtering removed from the omap hsmmc and mcspi drivers so they can provide a filter that works with either dmaengine driver. Also, that means DT support for the actual dmaengine driver too and some glue to configure the crossbar. I'll copy you when I get this RFC series posted and we can go from there. -Matt ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [alsa-devel] DT support for Davinci ASoC platform @ 2012-08-08 14:48 ` Porter, Matt 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Porter, Matt @ 2012-08-08 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Aug 8, 2012, at 9:36 AM, Daniel Mack wrote: > Hi Serkar, > > On 03.08.2012 11:09, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> On 8/3/2012 2:02 AM, Daniel Mack wrote: >>> On 05.07.2012 12:58, Daniel Mack wrote: >>>> Hi Gururaja, >>>> >>>> On 04.07.2012 14:48, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote: >>>>> All, >>>>> >>>>> Are there any plans or work going on for providing Device Tree Support for Davinci >>>>> ASoC? >>>>> >>>>> I am planning to add DT support for TI AM335x (McASP) and I don't want to do duplicate >>>>> task. >>>> >>>> That's good to know. But isn't there a dependency on the EDMA engine? Is >>>> that part ported yet? >>> >>> May I ask whether you made any progress on that yet? >> >> Matt Porter from TI is working on DMA engine migration. This would still >> be some time away since there is a bunch of work involved here. >> >> To make progress on Audio DT conversion Gururaja is doing an up port of >> AM335x EDMA support from TI release to mainline kernel. If you are >> interested in it, he can probably share that with you once he posts his >> DT patches. > > As the DMA engine is also a requirement for the MMC controller, I would > be interested in helping, in case help is required. Is there any > repository with code that I can have a look at? I'm just getting to the point now where I *almost* have something to push to my github repo and post. It'll be Davinci-specific to start since it's a wrapper around mach-davinci/dma.c and includes only memcpy and SG transfer type support initially...plus conversions of davinci spi/mmc drivers. There'll be a bit of work to get the omap-dma.c-dependent channel filtering removed from the omap hsmmc and mcspi drivers so they can provide a filter that works with either dmaengine driver. Also, that means DT support for the actual dmaengine driver too and some glue to configure the crossbar. I'll copy you when I get this RFC series posted and we can go from there. -Matt ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-08-08 14:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-07-04 12:48 DT support for Davinci ASoC platform Hebbar, Gururaja
2012-07-04 12:48 ` Hebbar, Gururaja
2012-07-05 10:58 ` Daniel Mack
2012-07-05 10:58 ` [alsa-devel] " Daniel Mack
2012-07-05 15:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-05 15:36 ` [alsa-devel] " Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-05 16:05 ` Daniel Mack
2012-07-05 16:05 ` [alsa-devel] " Daniel Mack
[not found] ` <4FF5BB34.9070002-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-06 13:12 ` Sekhar Nori
2012-07-06 13:12 ` Sekhar Nori
2012-07-06 15:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-06 15:01 ` [alsa-devel] " Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-02 20:32 ` Daniel Mack
2012-08-02 20:32 ` [alsa-devel] " Daniel Mack
2012-08-03 9:09 ` Sekhar Nori
2012-08-03 9:09 ` Sekhar Nori
2012-08-08 13:36 ` Daniel Mack
2012-08-08 13:36 ` [alsa-devel] " Daniel Mack
2012-08-08 14:48 ` Porter, Matt
2012-08-08 14:48 ` Porter, Matt
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.